Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0HAL

Reforestation Policy under Carbon Taxation: Climate Efficacy, Biodiversity, and Macro-Financial Risks

Abstract

This paper presents a global stock-flow consistent (SFC) macroeconomic model that couples climate damages with an explicit forestry module to examine how carbon pricing and reforestation policies interact to shape climate outcomes and financial stability. Built on a Goodwin-Keen framework, the model endogenizes underemployment, income distribution, inflation, and private debt, and tracks biome-specific biomass, harvesting, and sequestration, adding a biodiversity-relevant dimension. Baseline (no/low/high damage) counterfactuals are contrasted with convex carbon-tax schedules and linearly phased reforestation controls of varying intensity. Simulations to 2100 show strong policy interactions: carbon taxes curb fossil emissions but, by stimulating biomass substitution, can attenuate reforestation gains unless forest controls are sufficiently ambitious; reforestation expands stocks and sequestration yet raises implementation costs and private-debt burdens, reinforcing long-run deflationary pressures. By jointly evaluating climate efficacy and macro-financial risks, the framework clarifies trade-offs and complementarities in the design of carbon and forest policies.

Related

  1. Contrasting responses to climate change in two Dianthus species of the Irano-Anatolian biodiversity hotspot
    Maryam Behroozian
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  2. Borealization: a biodiversity refugium and evolutionary cradle during the Permian-Triassic climate crisis
    A. Shatwell, W. J. Foster
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  3. Shifting balance between habitat and climate in boreal biodiversity patterns across space, time and taxa
    Emy Guilbault, Laura H. Antão, Andrea Santangeli +16
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  4. Enabling climate action: A nexus approach for delivering co-benefits across biodiversity, water, food, and health
    Pramod K. Singh, Himangana Gupta, Julio Díaz-José +19
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Land use and climate warming interact to reshape global avian biodiversity through ecological filtering and homogenisation
    C. Ding, T. Newbold, A. Etard +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{bordenave2026reforestation,
  title = {{Reforestation Policy under Carbon Taxation: Climate Efficacy, Biodiversity, and Macro-Financial Risks}},
  author = {Matthieu Bordenave},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05754509v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Reforestation Policy under Carbon Taxation: Climate Efficacy, Biodiversity, and Macro-Financial Risks
AU  - Matthieu Bordenave
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
PB  - HAL
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05754509v1
AB  - This paper presents a global stock-flow consistent (SFC) macroeconomic model that couples climate damages with an explicit forestry module to examine how carbon pricing and reforestation policies interact to shape climate outcomes and financial stability. Built on a Goodwin-Keen framework, the model endogenizes underemployment, income distribution, inflation, and private debt, and tracks biome-specific biomass, harvesting, and sequestration, adding a biodiversity-relevant dimension. Baseline (no/low/high damage) counterfactuals are contrasted with convex carbon-tax schedules and linearly phased reforestation controls of varying intensity. Simulations to 2100 show strong policy interactions: carbon taxes curb fossil emissions but, by stimulating biomass substitution, can attenuate reforestation gains unless forest controls are sufficiently ambitious; reforestation expands stocks and sequestration yet raises implementation costs and private-debt burdens, reinforcing long-run deflationary pressures. By jointly evaluating climate efficacy and macro-financial risks, the framework clarifies trade-offs and complementarities in the design of carbon and forest policies.
ER  -