Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Solvent-Dependent Monomer Leaching From Two Commercial Dental Resin Composites: A Time-Dependent Elution Behaviour

  1. 1Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, Kalyani, IND
  2. 2Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Kalyani, IND
  3. 3Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, Kalyani, IND

Abstract

Background: Resin-based composites remain incompletely polymerised after light-curing, leaving unreacted monomers that can leach into oral fluids. Data on the temporal patterns of this release - especially contrasting flowable and packable composites under varying solvent conditions - remain limited.

Materials and methods: This in vitro study evaluated the identity and time-dependent elution of residual monomers from a packable composite (Charisma Smart) and a flowable composite (Fusion Flo). Specimens (n = 10 per composite × medium combination; 40 total) were immersed continuously in either deionised water or a 1:1 water-ethanol mixture. The extraction medium was fully replenished on Days 1, 2, 7, and 14, tracking the same specimens longitudinally (160 eluates total). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) qualitatively identified leached species. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry tracked relative monomer quantities calibrated against a triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) standard; for co-eluting species, values are reported as approximate methacrylate equivalents. Data were analysed using a split-plot three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's HSD post-hoc tests. Qualitative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) surveyed surface topography before and after 30-day immersion.

Results: Monomer leaching differed significantly by composite, medium, interval, and all interactions (p < 0.001). Water-ethanol produced substantially greater leaching than water for both composites (p < 0.05), with the packable composite releasing the largest absolute quantities (1,086.1 µg at Day 1). HRMS also detected urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) exclusively in the flowable composite's water-ethanol eluate. Only the flowable composite in water exhibited a simple monotonic decline across intervals. The other three conditions showed a sharp initial drop from Day 1 to Day 2, followed by a significant secondary rise at Day 7. SEM confirmed structural surface cracking and flaking in both media, alongside filler-scale pitting on water-ethanol-immersed surfaces.

Conclusion: Both composites released statistically distinguishable amounts of monomer, heavily accelerated by the water-ethanol medium. The non-monotonic temporal pattern reveals a complex secondary release phase not captured by standard single-decay models, highlighting the critical relevance of observation duration and solvent dynamics in biocompatibility screenings.

Related

  1. Process-dependent Analytical Differences Among Commercial Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Formulations
    Hyunjung Choi, Se Na Kim, Chang Ki Lee +4
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Natural Phenolic Antioxidants from Micromeria aybalae: Solvent-Dependent Composition and Bioactivity
    Zeyneb Karakus, Cengiz Sarikurkcu
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. A model for mosquito-borne epidemic outbreaks with information-dependent protective behaviour.
    Simone De Reggi, Andrea Pugliese, Mattia Sensi +1
    Journal of mathematical biologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Source-Dependent Renal Effects of Commercial Protein Supplements: A 28-Day Study in Rats.
    Engin Sümer, Elif Nur Sarıalioğlu, Ayşe Aksan +4
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Enhancement of thiourea leaching performance of refractory silver tailings by mechanical activation
    Fatih Apaydin
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{gilhotra2026solventdependent,
  title = {{Solvent-Dependent Monomer Leaching From Two Commercial Dental Resin Composites: A Time-Dependent Elution Behaviour}},
  author = {Vidushi Gilhotra and Rahul Banerjee and Ajay Chhabra and Shayan Karak and Supratim Ghosh and Bhupendra Ramesh Babaria},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117193},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720705},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Solvent-Dependent Monomer Leaching From Two Commercial Dental Resin Composites: A Time-Dependent Elution Behaviour
AU  - Vidushi Gilhotra
AU  - Rahul Banerjee
AU  - Ajay Chhabra
AU  - Shayan Karak
AU  - Supratim Ghosh
AU  - Bhupendra Ramesh Babaria
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117193
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13720705
AB  - Background: Resin-based composites remain incompletely polymerised after light-curing, leaving unreacted monomers that can leach into oral fluids. Data on the temporal patterns of this release - especially contrasting flowable and packable composites under varying solvent conditions - remain limited.  Materials and methods: This in vitro study evaluated the identity and time-dependent elution of residual monomers from a packable composite (Charisma Smart) and a flowable composite (Fusion Flo). Specimens (n = 10 per composite × medium combination; 40 total) were immersed continuously in either deionised water or a 1:1 water-ethanol mixture. The extraction medium was fully replenished on Days 1, 2, 7, and 14, tracking the same specimens longitudinally (160 eluates total). High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) qualitatively identified leached species. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry tracked relative monomer quantities calibrated against a triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) standard; for co-eluting species, values are reported as approximate methacrylate equivalents. Data were analysed using a split-plot three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's HSD post-hoc tests. Qualitative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) surveyed surface topography before and after 30-day immersion.  Results: Monomer leaching differed significantly by composite, medium, interval, and all interactions (p < 0.001). Water-ethanol produced substantially greater leaching than water for both composites (p < 0.05), with the packable composite releasing the largest absolute quantities (1,086.1 µg at Day 1). HRMS also detected urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) exclusively in the flowable composite's water-ethanol eluate. Only the flowable composite in water exhibited a simple monotonic decline across intervals. The other three conditions showed a sharp initial drop from Day 1 to Day 2, followed by a significant secondary rise at Day 7. SEM confirmed structural surface cracking and flaking in both media, alongside filler-scale pitting on water-ethanol-immersed surfaces.  Conclusion: Both composites released statistically distinguishable amounts of monomer, heavily accelerated by the water-ethanol medium. The non-monotonic temporal pattern reveals a complex secondary release phase not captured by standard single-decay models, highlighting the critical relevance of observation duration and solvent dynamics in biocompatibility screenings.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -