Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCmedRxiv

Ultra-high-resolution Photon-Counting CT for Leaflet-Specific Evaluation of Fibrosis and Calcification in Aortic Stenosis

6 more authors
  1. 1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53115 Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Objectives: Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT may enable leaflet-specific analysis of aortic valve fibrosis and calcification, providing insights into early aortic stenosis (AS) disease progression. This study aimed to investigate how PCD-CT leaflet-specific calcific and fibrotic volumes influence cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) leaflet mobility. Materials and methods: Participants with moderate aortic AS prospectively underwent both PCD-CT (n=80) and CMR (n=58). Using PCD-CT, calcific and fibrotic volumes were segmented for right (RCC), left (LCC), and non-coronary cusps (NCC) and indexed to the aortic annulus area (ICV and IFV). CMR-derived leaflet mobility index (LMI) was assessed. Two raters compared image quality using a Likert scale (1=poor to 5=excellent) and distinguishability of individual leaflets in PCD-CT with EID-CT (n=82). Results: PCD-CT analysis showed that calcification was higher in males (e.g., ICVRCC: 15+/-16 vs. 4+/-7 uL/cm^2; p<0.001), while fibrosis was higher in females (e.g., IFVLCC: 47+/-18 vs. 34+/-15 uL/cm^2; p=0.004) across all leaflets. Fibrocalcific ratio was higher in LCC (53+/-276) compared to RCC (19+/-48; p<0.001) and NCC (13.5+/-34; p<0.001). LMI of RCC was higher in females compared to men (0.66+/-0.21 vs. 0.38+/-0.33; p=0.008). LMILCC and LMINCC showed no sex differences. LMIRCC negatively correlated with ICVRCC ({rho}=-0.64 [-0.77, -0.46]; p<0.001) and LMINCC with ICVNCC ({rho}=-0.69 [-0.80, -0.53]; p<0.001), whereas LMILCC negatively correlated with IFVLCC ({rho}=-0.35 [-0.56, -0.10]; p=0.007), particularly in females ({rho}=-0.70 [-0.89, -0.31]; p=0.003). PCD-CT yielded higher image quality (5 [IQR 4-5] vs. 3 [3-4]; p<0.001) and leaflet distinguishability (79/80 [99%] vs. 42/82 [51%]; p<0.001) than EID-CT. Conclusions: Ultra-high-resolution PCD-CT allows for leaflet-specific quantification of indexed fibrotic and calcific volume. These volumes demonstrate sex- and leaflet-specific differences that may distinctly contribute to AS pathophysiology.

Related

  1. Acquisition Speed versus Spatial Resolution in Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT: Phantom Study to Guide Protocol Development
    N. Azimi, J. A. C. Lima, A. Pourmorteza
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  2. Single-Acquisition Spectral and Ultra-High-Resolution Pediatric Head CT: Phantom Comparison of Deep-Silicon Photon-Counting and Energy-Integrating Detectors
    S. G. Feemster, A. Rashidi, N. Azimi +5
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  3. Longitudinal single-cell RNA-seq profiling of lung cell phenotypes, signaling, and cross-talk during fibrosis resolution
    Jennifer Speth, Vivian T. Wong, Steve D. Guzman +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Sex-Specific Associations of Carotid Plaque Calcification Subtypes with Stroke, TIA, and Retinal Ischemia
    H. J. Komi, P. H. Ijäs, K. Nuotio +10
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textNeurologymedRxiv
  5. Evaluation of iodine detection and quantification limits in photon-counting CT—a phantom study
    Rebecca Titternes, Gavin Poludniowski, Torkel Bo Brismar +2
    European radiology experimentalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{bahaaeldin2026ultrahighresolution,
  title = {{Ultra-high-resolution Photon-Counting CT for Leaflet-Specific Evaluation of Fibrosis and Calcification in Aortic Stenosis}},
  author = {M. Bahaaeldin and J. Shamekhi and B. S. Franklin and S. Nowak and A. M. C. Bohner and D. Kravchenko and J. Wrobel and R. Phinicarides and L. Pennig and J. P. Janssen and C. Gietzen and S. Zimmer and S. Baldus and M. Kelm and G. Nickenig and T. Zeus and V. Mauri and J. A. Luetkens},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.26366483},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366483v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Ultra-high-resolution Photon-Counting CT for Leaflet-Specific Evaluation of Fibrosis and Calcification in Aortic Stenosis
AU  - M. Bahaaeldin
AU  - J. Shamekhi
AU  - B. S. Franklin
AU  - S. Nowak
AU  - A. M. C. Bohner
AU  - D. Kravchenko
AU  - J. Wrobel
AU  - R. Phinicarides
AU  - L. Pennig
AU  - J. P. Janssen
AU  - C. Gietzen
AU  - S. Zimmer
AU  - S. Baldus
AU  - M. Kelm
AU  - G. Nickenig
AU  - T. Zeus
AU  - V. Mauri
AU  - J. A. Luetkens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.27.26366483
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366483v1
AB  - Objectives: Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT may enable leaflet-specific analysis of aortic valve fibrosis and calcification, providing insights into early aortic stenosis (AS) disease progression. This study aimed to investigate how PCD-CT leaflet-specific calcific and fibrotic volumes influence cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) leaflet mobility. Materials and methods: Participants with moderate aortic AS prospectively underwent both PCD-CT (n=80) and CMR (n=58). Using PCD-CT, calcific and fibrotic volumes were segmented for right (RCC), left (LCC), and non-coronary cusps (NCC) and indexed to the aortic annulus area (ICV and IFV). CMR-derived leaflet mobility index (LMI) was assessed. Two raters compared image quality using a Likert scale (1=poor to 5=excellent) and distinguishability of individual leaflets in PCD-CT with EID-CT (n=82). Results: PCD-CT analysis showed that calcification was higher in males (e.g., ICVRCC: 15+/-16 vs. 4+/-7 uL/cm^2; p<0.001), while fibrosis was higher in females (e.g., IFVLCC: 47+/-18 vs. 34+/-15 uL/cm^2; p=0.004) across all leaflets. Fibrocalcific ratio was higher in LCC (53+/-276) compared to RCC (19+/-48; p<0.001) and NCC (13.5+/-34; p<0.001). LMI of RCC was higher in females compared to men (0.66+/-0.21 vs. 0.38+/-0.33; p=0.008). LMILCC and LMINCC showed no sex differences. LMIRCC negatively correlated with ICVRCC ({rho}=-0.64 [-0.77, -0.46]; p<0.001) and LMINCC with ICVNCC ({rho}=-0.69 [-0.80, -0.53]; p<0.001), whereas LMILCC negatively correlated with IFVLCC ({rho}=-0.35 [-0.56, -0.10]; p=0.007), particularly in females ({rho}=-0.70 [-0.89, -0.31]; p=0.003). PCD-CT yielded higher image quality (5 [IQR 4-5] vs. 3 [3-4]; p<0.001) and leaflet distinguishability (79/80 [99%] vs. 42/82 [51%]; p<0.001) than EID-CT. Conclusions: Ultra-high-resolution PCD-CT allows for leaflet-specific quantification of indexed fibrotic and calcific volume. These volumes demonstrate sex- and leaflet-specific differences that may distinctly contribute to AS pathophysiology.
ER  -