Rapid generation advancement in soybean: approaches, constraints, and the stage-dependent photoperiod window
Abstract
Long generation intervals constrain realized genetic gain in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) breeding. Speed-breeding protocols developed for long-day and day-neutral crops use an extended photoperiod throughout the entire life cycle. They are not directly applicable to soybean, because the E1 family represses the florigen genes GmFT2a and GmFT5a under long days and delays flowering. Rapid generation advancement in soybean therefore depends on a stage-dependent photoperiod window. Before flowering, the photoperiod (10–12 h in published stage-dependent protocols) must remain below the genotype-specific critical photoperiod, and an extended photoperiod can be introduced only after flowering (R1 stage), to accelerate seed maturation. Optimized continuous short-day systems are reported to allow up to five generations per year, and six are reported by one study that combined a post-flowering 22-h photoperiod with germination of immature seed. These figures come from different studies, genotypes and facilities. To our knowledge, no study has yet compared cycle length under a post-flowering long day with a corresponding short-day control in the same genotypes. A post-flowering 22-h photoperiod also reduced leaf photosynthetic capacity, and applying the same early harvest date to all plants may change allele frequencies in segregating populations. This review summarizes soybean speed-breeding protocols, their infrastructure requirements, and their physiological and genetic limitations. It also evaluates the integration of these protocols with marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and genome editing. Early seed harvest and high-density planting can be transferred between crops, but the photoperiod regime must be tailored to soybean. We conclude that the evidence supports soybean speed breeding as a method for accelerating generation turnover, and that phenotypic selection in the chamber needs to be validated in the field. Published controlled-environment soybean protocols do not report changes in allele frequency during accelerated advancement or genetic correlations between traits measured in the chamber and in the field. Both are needed to show whether rapid cycling translates into genetic gain in the field.
Related
- Night-break photoperiod timing shapes growth trajectories, functional phenotype, and biomass partitioning in Cannabis sativa L. in a genotype-dependent manner
- Advances and challenges in avian influenza vaccines: From conventional approaches to next-generation strategies
- Machine learning-assisted Repli-Histo labeling reveals distinct transcription-dependent constraints on chromatin motion in living cells
- A novel photoperiod-sensitive laying curve for modelling egg production in native chickens and the effect of black soldier fly larvae supplementation under agroecological conditions
- Integrating culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches to explore the diversity of endophytic bacteria associated with Urtica dioica L. in Poland with screening of pigment-producing isolates.
BibTeX
@article{habib2026rapid,
title = {{Rapid generation advancement in soybean: approaches, constraints, and the stage-dependent photoperiod window}},
author = {Yawar Habib and Altafur Rahman and Gabriele Adornato and Elshan Musazade and Anshika Bhatla and Rachna Gowlikar and Avanish Rai and Tsanko Gechev and Xianzhong Feng and Elena Potokina},
journal = {Frontiers in Plant Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpls.2026.1992171},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1992171},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Rapid generation advancement in soybean: approaches, constraints, and the stage-dependent photoperiod window
AU - Yawar Habib
AU - Altafur Rahman
AU - Gabriele Adornato
AU - Elshan Musazade
AU - Anshika Bhatla
AU - Rachna Gowlikar
AU - Avanish Rai
AU - Tsanko Gechev
AU - Xianzhong Feng
AU - Elena Potokina
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Frontiers in Plant Science
DO - 10.3389/fpls.2026.1992171
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1992171
AB - Long generation intervals constrain realized genetic gain in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) breeding. Speed-breeding protocols developed for long-day and day-neutral crops use an extended photoperiod throughout the entire life cycle. They are not directly applicable to soybean, because the E1 family represses the florigen genes GmFT2a and GmFT5a under long days and delays flowering. Rapid generation advancement in soybean therefore depends on a stage-dependent photoperiod window. Before flowering, the photoperiod (10–12 h in published stage-dependent protocols) must remain below the genotype-specific critical photoperiod, and an extended photoperiod can be introduced only after flowering (R1 stage), to accelerate seed maturation. Optimized continuous short-day systems are reported to allow up to five generations per year, and six are reported by one study that combined a post-flowering 22-h photoperiod with germination of immature seed. These figures come from different studies, genotypes and facilities. To our knowledge, no study has yet compared cycle length under a post-flowering long day with a corresponding short-day control in the same genotypes. A post-flowering 22-h photoperiod also reduced leaf photosynthetic capacity, and applying the same early harvest date to all plants may change allele frequencies in segregating populations. This review summarizes soybean speed-breeding protocols, their infrastructure requirements, and their physiological and genetic limitations. It also evaluates the integration of these protocols with marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and genome editing. Early seed harvest and high-density planting can be transferred between crops, but the photoperiod regime must be tailored to soybean. We conclude that the evidence supports soybean speed breeding as a method for accelerating generation turnover, and that phenotypic selection in the chamber needs to be validated in the field. Published controlled-environment soybean protocols do not report changes in allele frequency during accelerated advancement or genetic correlations between traits measured in the chamber and in the field. Both are needed to show whether rapid cycling translates into genetic gain in the field.
SN - 1664-462X
ER -