Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Rapid environmental DNA detection with isothermal amplification methods: a comparison with the real-time quantitative PCR in the natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita).

  1. 1Argaly, Montmelian, France and Centre de Recherche sur la Biodiversite et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300 CNRS, IRD, INP, UT, Toulouse, France

Abstract

Species detection relying on environmental DNA (eDNA) traditionally relies on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). This amplification technique takes in general a minimum of one hour and requires in most cases access to specialized laboratories and equipment. Isothermal amplification techniques, originating from clinical research, are emerging as rapid and field-deployable alternative methods. Yet, whether their sensitivity, specificity, and cost/time-efficiency are comparable to the traditional real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) remains to be assessed. In this work, we compare the performance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with qPCR to detect the natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita) from aquatic filtrations. This objective was achieved in three steps. First, we developed LAMP and RPA primers specific to the target species based on its mitochondrial genome. Second, we amplified DNA extracts from E. calamita and from tissues of closely related species using real-time fluorescence detection with LAMP, RPA, and qPCR commercially available protocols to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the three methods. Finally, we validated all protocols on eDNA extracts recovered from water samples from ponds surveyed by field scientists. We show that RPA had a sensitivity equivalent to that of the qPCR, while LAMP sensitivity was ten times lower. All our assays amplified the species DNA in eDNA samples where the species was observed by field scientists. Through this work, we thus propose a robust methodology for implementing isothermal amplification assays for eDNA applications and show that RPA is a good alternative to qPCR for detecting conservation-priority species (i.e. protected or invasive species) when time and lab facilities are constrained.

Related

  1. Development of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for Balamuthia mandrillaris
    C. Lu, C. Sharma, S. Kanumuru +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  2. Development of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Three Viruses Infecting Areca catechu L.
    Xiaoqing Niu, Yujing Tian, Jianguo Shen +2
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  3. An FTA card-based CRISPR/Cas12a platform with isothermal amplification for portable tuberculosis diagnosis
    Jiayin Xing, Xiangxiang Zhao, Gaojie Wang +9
    Frontiers in microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
  4. Diagnostic utility of colourimetric readout loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Babesia gibsoni at the clinical point-of-care (POC)
    Sihua Tan, Omid Nekouei, Vanessa R. Barrs +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyDOAJ
  5. Genome-Informed Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assays for Detection and Differentiation of Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum Phylotypes I and III
    Brijesh B. Karakkat, Qi Huang, Schyler O. Nunziata +1
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{chieux2026rapid,
  title = {{Rapid environmental DNA detection with isothermal amplification methods: a comparison with the real-time quantitative PCR in the natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita).}},
  author = {A. Chieux and A. Guerrieri and E. Bellemain and F. Boyer and T. Merzi and P. Tablerlet and A. Iribar and L. Zinger and A. Bonin},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.06.764843},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.06.764843v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Rapid environmental DNA detection with isothermal amplification methods: a comparison with the real-time quantitative PCR in the natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita).
AU  - A. Chieux
AU  - A. Guerrieri
AU  - E. Bellemain
AU  - F. Boyer
AU  - T. Merzi
AU  - P. Tablerlet
AU  - A. Iribar
AU  - L. Zinger
AU  - A. Bonin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.06.764843
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.06.764843v1
AB  - Species detection relying on environmental DNA (eDNA) traditionally relies on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). This amplification technique takes in general a minimum of one hour and requires in most cases access to specialized laboratories and equipment. Isothermal amplification techniques, originating from clinical research, are emerging as rapid and field-deployable alternative methods. Yet, whether their sensitivity, specificity, and cost/time-efficiency are comparable to the traditional real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) remains to be assessed. In this work, we compare the performance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with qPCR to detect the natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita) from aquatic filtrations. This objective was achieved in three steps. First, we developed LAMP and RPA primers specific to the target species based on its mitochondrial genome. Second, we amplified DNA extracts from E. calamita and from tissues of closely related species using real-time fluorescence detection with LAMP, RPA, and qPCR commercially available protocols to evaluate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the three methods. Finally, we validated all protocols on eDNA extracts recovered from water samples from ponds surveyed by field scientists. We show that RPA had a sensitivity equivalent to that of the qPCR, while LAMP sensitivity was ten times lower. All our assays amplified the species DNA in eDNA samples where the species was observed by field scientists. Through this work, we thus propose a robust methodology for implementing isothermal amplification assays for eDNA applications and show that RPA is a good alternative to qPCR for detecting conservation-priority species (i.e. protected or invasive species) when time and lab facilities are constrained.
ER  -