Psychometric validation of the Chinese Physical Effort Scale and profiles of physical-effort approach and avoidance among Chinese university students
- 1School of Physical Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
Abstract
Objective: Individual differences in tendencies to approach or avoid physical effort may be relevant to exercise-related psychological and behavioral characteristics. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese Physical Effort Scale (PES) and investigated individual differences in physical-effort approach and avoidance tendencies and their associations with exercise-related psychological and behavioral variables among Chinese university students.
Methods: Participants were 1,273 students from six universities across eastern, central, and western China. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, reliability and validity analyses, and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis were used to evaluate the factor structure, reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the Chinese PES. Latent profile analysis identified configurations of physical effort approach and avoidance, and BCH analyses compared profiles on emotion regulation, exercise motivation, and physical activity.
Results: Factor analyses supported a two-factor structure comprising physical effort approach and avoidance. The scale showed high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, with evidence supporting convergent and discriminant validity and metric and scalar invariance across gender and academic year. Three profiles were identified: Balanced (59.07%), Avoidance-Oriented (14.93%), and Approach-Oriented (26.00%). The Approach-Oriented profile showed higher cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, external regulation, introjected regulation, and autonomous regulation, and lower amotivation. It also showed higher total physical activity than the other profiles and higher weekly exercise frequency than the Balanced profile.
Conclusion: The Chinese PES showed psychometric support among Chinese university students. Distinct configurations of physical effort approach and avoidance were associated with emotion regulation, exercise motivation, and physical activity.
Related
- Turkish Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Mirror Image Comfort and Avoidance Scale (MICAS) in University Students
- Psychometric validation of the Chinese generative artificial intelligence acceptance scale among university students
- Early detection of problematic internet use among university students: psychometric validation of the PIUQ-9
- Psychometric validation of the positive youth development scale–short form in Peruvian university students
- Development and initial psychometric validation of the Organ Donation Scale for University Students (ODS-US)
BibTeX
@article{liu2026psychometric,
title = {{Psychometric validation of the Chinese Physical Effort Scale and profiles of physical-effort approach and avoidance among Chinese university students}},
author = {Yijun Liu and Qiang Zhou},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1959219},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1959219},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Psychometric validation of the Chinese Physical Effort Scale and profiles of physical-effort approach and avoidance among Chinese university students
AU - Yijun Liu
AU - Qiang Zhou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1959219
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1959219
AB - Objective: Individual differences in tendencies to approach or avoid physical effort may be relevant to exercise-related psychological and behavioral characteristics. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese Physical Effort Scale (PES) and investigated individual differences in physical-effort approach and avoidance tendencies and their associations with exercise-related psychological and behavioral variables among Chinese university students. Methods: Participants were 1,273 students from six universities across eastern, central, and western China. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, reliability and validity analyses, and multigroup confirmatory factor analysis were used to evaluate the factor structure, reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the Chinese PES. Latent profile analysis identified configurations of physical effort approach and avoidance, and BCH analyses compared profiles on emotion regulation, exercise motivation, and physical activity. Results: Factor analyses supported a two-factor structure comprising physical effort approach and avoidance. The scale showed high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, with evidence supporting convergent and discriminant validity and metric and scalar invariance across gender and academic year. Three profiles were identified: Balanced (59.07%), Avoidance-Oriented (14.93%), and Approach-Oriented (26.00%). The Approach-Oriented profile showed higher cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, external regulation, introjected regulation, and autonomous regulation, and lower amotivation. It also showed higher total physical activity than the other profiles and higher weekly exercise frequency than the Balanced profile. Conclusion: The Chinese PES showed psychometric support among Chinese university students. Distinct configurations of physical effort approach and avoidance were associated with emotion regulation, exercise motivation, and physical activity.
SN - 1664-1078
ER -