Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Assessment of end-tidal CO₂ levels in the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary embolism

  1. 1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Yakutiye, Erzurum, 25240 Turkey
  2. 2Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Aksaray University School of Medicine, Aksaray, Turkey
  3. 3Department of Radiology, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Yakutiye, Erzurum, 25240 Turkey

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening emergency associated with acute cardiopulmonary deterioration. This study evaluated the clinical utility of end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) for assessing disease severity and monitoring treatment response in high- and intermediate–high-risk PE.

Methods: This prospective study (registry ID: NCT07241130) included 120 individuals presenting between February and July 2025, categorized into four groups: high-risk PE with thrombolysis, intermediate–high-risk PE with thrombolysis, intermediate–high-risk PE without thrombolysis, and healthy controls. Physiological parameters were measured using the Rad-97 monitor under standardized conditions.

Results: Baseline EtCO₂ levels differed significantly among the groups (p < 0.001). The lowest mean EtCO₂ value was observed in the high-risk PE group (15.2 ± 1.9 mmHg) and the highest in the control group (31.8 ± 3.1 mmHg). After 24 h of treatment, there were no significant differences among the groups in terms of EtCO₂, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), or perfusion index (PI) values (p > 0.05). EtCO₂ was negatively correlated with pulmonary artery obstruction index (r = − 0.358, p = 0.01) and positively correlated with SpO₂ (r = 0.594, p < 0.001) and PI (r = 0.431, p < 0.001). ROC analysis identified an optimum EtCO₂ cutoff of 17.5 mmHg to discriminate between patients with and without thrombolytic therapy (97% sensitivity, 85% specificity).

Conclusion: EtCO₂ is a simple, noninvasive physiological marker associated with thrombus burden and treatment-related changes in PE. Rather than determining therapeutic decisions, EtCO₂ may complement established clinical and imaging parameters by providing supportive physiological information in acute settings.

Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07241130. Retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04570-y.

Related

  1. Clinical research advances in pulmonary infections in 2025: a narrative review of multipathogen assessment, precision diagnosis, and integrated management
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. PO001 | EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT MANAGEMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN CANCER PATIENTS: PROGNOSTIC STRATIFICATION AND OUTCOMES
    Alessandro Decursu
    Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineDOAJ
  3. Prognostic Significance of Serum Sodium in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Patchara Kochaiyapatana, Sukrisd Koowattanatianchai, Jayanton Patumanond +2
    Journal of Clinical Medicine ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Lifestyle, Dietary Habits, and Modifiable Risk Factors in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study with Development and Validation of a Composite Lifestyle and Nutrition Questionnaire
    Carina Gib, Alina Anton, Andreea-Adriana Neamțu +8
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Integrated management of acute pulmonary embolism and the post-pulmonary embolism syndrome: risk stratification, modern therapies, and long-term follow-up
    Maria-Laura Craciun, Cristiana Adina Avram, Ana-Maria Pah +6
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@article{celik2026assessment,
  title = {{Assessment of end-tidal CO₂ levels in the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary embolism}},
  author = {Kadir Çelik and Buğra Kerget and Alperen Aksakal and Elif Yılmazel Uçar and Mustafa Yeşilyurt and Leyla Sağlam},
  journal = {BMC Pulmonary Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12890-026-04570-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04570-y},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Assessment of end-tidal CO₂ levels in the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary embolism
AU  - Kadir Çelik
AU  - Buğra Kerget
AU  - Alperen Aksakal
AU  - Elif Yılmazel Uçar
AU  - Mustafa Yeşilyurt
AU  - Leyla Sağlam
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - BMC Pulmonary Medicine
DO  - 10.1186/s12890-026-04570-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04570-y
AB  - Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening emergency associated with acute cardiopulmonary deterioration. This study evaluated the clinical utility of end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) for assessing disease severity and monitoring treatment response in high- and intermediate–high-risk PE.  Methods: This prospective study (registry ID: NCT07241130) included 120 individuals presenting between February and July 2025, categorized into four groups: high-risk PE with thrombolysis, intermediate–high-risk PE with thrombolysis, intermediate–high-risk PE without thrombolysis, and healthy controls. Physiological parameters were measured using the Rad-97 monitor under standardized conditions.  Results: Baseline EtCO₂ levels differed significantly among the groups (p < 0.001). The lowest mean EtCO₂ value was observed in the high-risk PE group (15.2 ± 1.9 mmHg) and the highest in the control group (31.8 ± 3.1 mmHg). After 24 h of treatment, there were no significant differences among the groups in terms of EtCO₂, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), or perfusion index (PI) values (p > 0.05). EtCO₂ was negatively correlated with pulmonary artery obstruction index (r = − 0.358, p = 0.01) and positively correlated with SpO₂ (r = 0.594, p < 0.001) and PI (r = 0.431, p < 0.001). ROC analysis identified an optimum EtCO₂ cutoff of 17.5 mmHg to discriminate between patients with and without thrombolytic therapy (97% sensitivity, 85% specificity).  Conclusion: EtCO₂ is a simple, noninvasive physiological marker associated with thrombus burden and treatment-related changes in PE. Rather than determining therapeutic decisions, EtCO₂ may complement established clinical and imaging parameters by providing supportive physiological information in acute settings.  Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07241130. Retrospectively registered.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04570-y.
SN  - 1471-2466
ER  -