Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Fisher and DALI posterior approximations for testing gravity with gravitational waves

Abstract

We investigate the accuracy and computational efficiency of posterior approximations for gravitational-wave (GW) parameter estimation based on Fisher Matrix and its higher-order extension, the Derivative Approximation for LIkelihoods (DALI), in the context of tests of General Relativity using parameterized deviations in the inspiral waveforms (the TIGER formalism). We adopt the \texttt{IMRPhenomD} waveform and compare the exact posterior sampling to the following approximations in increasing order of complexity: the traditional Fisher Matrix, the Fisher sampling (singlet-DALI), the doublet-DALI and the triplet-DALI. We find that both singlet and doublet-DALI are significantly faster than the exact posterior by factors between 20 and 1000, depending on the inspiral SNRs -- larger gains correspond to larger SNRs. These gains are considerably larger for more complete waveforms, such as \texttt{IMRPhenomHM}. To evaluate the accuracy of the approximations, we use Jensen-Shannon divergence. We conclude that both singlet and doublet-DALI systematically improves over the standard Fisher Matrix approximation, while triplet-DALI shows large variability, limiting its practical advantage. We also introduce a code with a new implementation of Fisher and DALI analysis (Symbolic DALI, \texttt{SymDALI}) which computes derivatives symbolically via \textit{Wolfram Language}.

Related

  1. How general relativity stacks up: Testing gravity by coherently combining gravitational-wave observations
    Lachlan Passenger, Nir Guttman, Paul D. Lasky +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. The Impact of Inclination, Redshift, and Mass Ratio Selection on Cosmological Constraints from Bright Sirens Beyond Conventional Fisher Approximations
    Gustavo B. F. Lima, Rafael F. Aranha, Rodrigo S. Gonçalves
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  3. Searching for gravitational wave echo with group equivariant neural posterior estimation
    Jian-Wei Luo, Yun-Song Piao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Testing SALT Approximations with Numerical Radiative Transfer Code. II. Thermal and Microturbulent Line Broadening
    Cody Carr, Renyue Cen, Leo Michel-Dansac +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGalaxiesarXiv
  5. Fisher Information Velocity: A New Geometric Channel for Precision Glitch Identification in Gravitational-Wave Detectors
    James Kennington, Zach Yarbrough
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textInstrumentation & methodsGravitation & general relativityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{barbosa2026fisher,
  title = {{Fisher and DALI posterior approximations for testing gravity with gravitational waves}},
  author = {Felipe A. da Silva Barbosa and Davi C. Rodrigues and Josiel Mendonça Soares de Souza and Miguel Quartin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38399},
  eprint = {2609.38399},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38399},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Fisher and DALI posterior approximations for testing gravity with gravitational waves
AU  - Felipe A. da Silva Barbosa
AU  - Davi C. Rodrigues
AU  - Josiel Mendonça Soares de Souza
AU  - Miguel Quartin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38399
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38399
AB  - We investigate the accuracy and computational efficiency of posterior approximations for gravitational-wave (GW) parameter estimation based on Fisher Matrix and its higher-order extension, the Derivative Approximation for LIkelihoods (DALI), in the context of tests of General Relativity using parameterized deviations in the inspiral waveforms (the TIGER formalism). We adopt the \texttt{IMRPhenomD} waveform and compare the exact posterior sampling to the following approximations in increasing order of complexity: the traditional Fisher Matrix, the Fisher sampling (singlet-DALI), the doublet-DALI and the triplet-DALI. We find that both singlet and doublet-DALI are significantly faster than the exact posterior by factors between 20 and 1000, depending on the inspiral SNRs -- larger gains correspond to larger SNRs. These gains are considerably larger for more complete waveforms, such as \texttt{IMRPhenomHM}. To evaluate the accuracy of the approximations, we use Jensen-Shannon divergence. We conclude that both singlet and doublet-DALI systematically improves over the standard Fisher Matrix approximation, while triplet-DALI shows large variability, limiting its practical advantage. We also introduce a code with a new implementation of Fisher and DALI analysis (Symbolic DALI, \texttt{SymDALI}) which computes derivatives symbolically via \textit{Wolfram Language}.
ER  -