Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Improved upper bound on the number of distinct k-decks for any k and alphabet size by counting the independent parameters

Abstract

Data stored in synthetic DNA is retrieved by shotgun sequencing, which returns short subsequences rather than the stored word itself. A natural abstraction of this readout is the k-deck of a word: the vector recording how often each word of length k occurs as a subsequence. Two stored words are distinguishable from their readouts exactly when their k-decks differ, so the number Dq,k(n) of distinct k-decks of words of length n over an alphabet of size q measures what a length-k readout retains. We analyse the degrees of freedom remaining in a k-deck once all shorter decks are fixed. Within each class of words having prescribed letter multiplicities, the length-k entries are confined to an affine subspace whose dimension is exactly the number of Lyndon words with the same multiplicities, which we give in closed form as a Möbius sum. Writing Lq(j) for the number of Lyndon words of length j over an alphabet of size q, we deduce the improved upper bound Dq,k(n)=O (nEq(k)), Eq(k)=∑j=1kj Lq(j)−1 . In the case of a binary alphabet this bound satisfies D2,k(n)=O (n4· 2k−1). We then prove matching lower bounds in the first two nontrivial cases: Dq,2(n)=Θ (nq2−1) for every alphabet size q, and D2,3(n)=Θ(n9) for the binary alphabet. The latter confirms, for q=2 and k=3, our conjecture that the upper bound has the correct degree for every q and k.

Related

  1. The Expected Number of Distinct Substrings in an Alphabet String
    Anant Godbole
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsProbabilityarXiv
  2. Improved LCL Equivalences and Curve Decoding Alphabet Sizes
    Rohan Goyal, Venkatesan Guruswami, Yihang Sun +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Counting almost independent sets in regular graphs
    Gaia Carenini
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. On Counting Independent Sets in Regular Hypergraphs
    Michail Sarantis, Prasad Tetali, Zeyu Zheng
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Finite Bases for Truncated Cyclic Group Flat Semirings with Two Independent Parameters
    Qirui Ma, Zidong Gao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{nilforoushan2026improved,
  title = {{Improved upper bound on the number of distinct k-decks for any k and alphabet size by counting the independent parameters}},
  author = {Arman Nilforoushan and Farzad Parvaresh},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.23106},
  eprint = {2609.23106},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23106},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Improved upper bound on the number of distinct k-decks for any k and alphabet size by counting the independent parameters
AU  - Arman Nilforoushan
AU  - Farzad Parvaresh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.23106
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23106
AB  - Data stored in synthetic DNA is retrieved by shotgun sequencing, which returns short subsequences rather than the stored word itself. A natural abstraction of this readout is the k-deck of a word: the vector recording how often each word of length k occurs as a subsequence. Two stored words are distinguishable from their readouts exactly when their k-decks differ, so the number D_q,k(n) of distinct k-decks of words of length n over an alphabet of size q measures what a length-k readout retains. We analyse the degrees of freedom remaining in a k-deck once all shorter decks are fixed. Within each class of words having prescribed letter multiplicities, the length-k entries are confined to an affine subspace whose dimension is exactly the number of Lyndon words with the same multiplicities, which we give in closed form as a Möbius sum. Writing L_q(j) for the number of Lyndon words of length j over an alphabet of size q, we deduce the improved upper bound D_q,k(n)=O (n^E_q(k)), E_q(k)=∑_j=1^kj L_q(j)−1 . In the case of a binary alphabet this bound satisfies D_2,k(n)=O (n^4· 2^k−1). We then prove matching lower bounds in the first two nontrivial cases: D_q,2(n)=Θ (n^q^2−1) for every alphabet size q, and D_2,3(n)=Θ(n^9) for the binary alphabet. The latter confirms, for q=2 and k=3, our conjecture that the upper bound has the correct degree for every q and k.
ER  -