Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Autonomic Changes During an Adaptive Cognitive Task

  1. 1Institute of Health Studies, DSW Ideis University, 53-611 Wroclaw, Poland
  2. 2Department of Fundamentals of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland
  3. 3Department of Biological Principles of Physical Activity, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study examined between-participant associations of task-minus-baseline heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) changes with performance during the adaptive Determination Test (DT), in which performance influences subsequent task demand. Methods: This exploratory secondary analysis included 48 young adults. Accuracy was the study-defined proportion correct/(correct + incorrect + omitted), calculated from exported counts. Ten Pearson correlations formed the primary analytical family. Complementary fractional-logit and linear models included the corresponding baseline physiological value and the exported stimulus count (DT_Stimuli). Tonic skin conductance level and skin conductance response (SCR) frequency and amplitude were also examined. Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) adjustment was applied separately to the defined analytical families. Results: Mean HR increased by 19.99 bpm and mean SC by 4.65 µS. The HR–accuracy Pearson estimate was r = 0.338 (95% CI 0.060 to 0.568; p = 0.019; BH q = 0.187), compared with Spearman ρ = 0.192. In the model including baseline HR and DT_Stimuli, the average marginal association was 1.42 percentage points per 10 bpm (95% bootstrap CI 0.13 to 2.65; p = 0.033; BH q = 0.306). Neither the primary correlation family nor the 15 complementary model tests met q < 0.05. Direct comparisons did not establish different HR and SC correlations. Conclusions: HR and SC increased during adaptive DT performance. A possible HR–accuracy association depended on analytical specification. Adjustment for aggregate stimulus count did not identify the direction of the performance–demand–physiology relationship. These findings support prospective testing with time-resolved task exposure.

Related

  1. The effects of route previewing on adaptive gait and gaze behaviour under cognitive dual-task conditions in older adults
    O. McVeigh-Mellor, A. J. Cocks, L. OReilly +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  2. Pain attenuation during task: a proof-of-concept study for a new scoring metric to capture individual differences in chronic pain changes by task engagement
    Vaidhehi Veena Sanmugananthan, Vaidhehi Veena Sanmugananthan, Rima El-Sayed +6
    Frontiers in Pain ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  3. Analysis of taVNS effects on baroreflex sensitivity and autonomic nervous system regulation during head-up tilt test
    Geonhee Lee, Donghun Kang, Jiseok Lee +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  4. Stress-Induced Changes in Autonomic Activity and Fascia Hydration: A Cross-Recurrence Quantification Analysis in a Naturalistic Exam Paradigm
    Andreas Brandl, Lea Overmann, Robert Schleip +3
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Effects of cognitive-motor dual-task walking exercise versus walking-only exercise on cognitive function and patient-centred outcomes in older adults with subjective brain fog: a randomised controlled trial.
    Emre Dansuk, Burak Menek
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{lachowicz2026autonomic,
  title = {{Autonomic Changes During an Adaptive Cognitive Task}},
  author = {Maciej Lachowicz and Iwona Wilk and Igor Hrehorowicz and Szymon Bałamucki and Michał Lisowski and Grzegorz Żurek and Waldemar Andrzejewski},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15208068},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8068},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Autonomic Changes During an Adaptive Cognitive Task
AU  - Maciej Lachowicz
AU  - Iwona Wilk
AU  - Igor Hrehorowicz
AU  - Szymon Bałamucki
AU  - Michał Lisowski
AU  - Grzegorz Żurek
AU  - Waldemar Andrzejewski
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15208068
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8068
AB  - Background/Objectives: This study examined between-participant associations of task-minus-baseline heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) changes with performance during the adaptive Determination Test (DT), in which performance influences subsequent task demand. Methods: This exploratory secondary analysis included 48 young adults. Accuracy was the study-defined proportion correct/(correct + incorrect + omitted), calculated from exported counts. Ten Pearson correlations formed the primary analytical family. Complementary fractional-logit and linear models included the corresponding baseline physiological value and the exported stimulus count (DT_Stimuli). Tonic skin conductance level and skin conductance response (SCR) frequency and amplitude were also examined. Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) adjustment was applied separately to the defined analytical families. Results: Mean HR increased by 19.99 bpm and mean SC by 4.65 µS. The HR–accuracy Pearson estimate was r = 0.338 (95% CI 0.060 to 0.568; p = 0.019; BH q = 0.187), compared with Spearman ρ = 0.192. In the model including baseline HR and DT_Stimuli, the average marginal association was 1.42 percentage points per 10 bpm (95% bootstrap CI 0.13 to 2.65; p = 0.033; BH q = 0.306). Neither the primary correlation family nor the 15 complementary model tests met q < 0.05. Direct comparisons did not establish different HR and SC correlations. Conclusions: HR and SC increased during adaptive DT performance. A possible HR–accuracy association depended on analytical specification. Adjustment for aggregate stimulus count did not identify the direction of the performance–demand–physiology relationship. These findings support prospective testing with time-resolved task exposure.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -