Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYWater Biology and Security

Data centers: an emerging threat to freshwater biodiversity in the United States

  1. 1Corresponding author.
  2. 2Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

Abstract

This study lays the foundation for future research to quantify data center (DC) impacts on freshwater biodiversity in the US. The proliferation of DCs is increasing energy and water stress in the US. Although past research has quantified the water and carbon dimensions of sustainability associated with DCs, the potential threats to aquatic biodiversity from DCs in the US have yet to be examined. We present a risk-assessment framework for understanding potential stresses on aquatic biota, including direct effects of water cooling and indirect effects mediated by electricity from two sources: thermoelectric and hydroelectric power. For DCs using thermoelectric power, we conducted a screening-level analysis to identify areas of overlap between areas with a high DC water-scarcity footprint and aquatic biodiversity. As subbasins draining to the Atlantic Ocean and the Great Lakes support higher fish and mussel diversity, DCs could potentially expose more species to the impacts of water scarcity. Similarly, subbasins draining to the Atlantic support high human population densities (water demand) and fish richness. To reduce climate impacts and water stress, some DCs are turning to hydropower. However, this option also has the potential to increase risk to aquatic biota. Higher demand for hydropower from DCs in summer is likely to worsen the effects of climate warming on aquatic ecosystems. In addition, night-time generation to meet 24/7 DC demand could increase entrainment of small fish and larvae. Finally, if non-powered dams are relicensed to support DCs, economic justifications for dam removal will be weakened with adverse consequences for diadromous fishes, mussels, and other aquatic biota. In addition to highlighting broad geographic patterns, we use case studies to illustrate examples of DCs sourcing (or proposing to source) electricity from thermoelectric, existing hydropower plants, and the addition of turbines to non-powered dams. We conclude with a brief discussion of mitigation options for the DC industry that might improve sustainability from the perspective of freshwater biota.

Related

  1. A freshwater resilient and connected network to sustain biodiversity under a changing climate
    Mark G. Anderson, Arlene P. Olivero, Analie R. Barnett +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyHydrology & soilsPLOS
  2. Standardizing freshwater macroinvertebrate taxonomy: a Lithuanian operational taxa list for ecological quality assessments and biodiversity research.
    Diana Osadčaja, Giedrė Višinskienė, Sabina Solovjova +2
    Environmental monitoring and assessmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEcologyEurope PMC
  3. Comparing morphological and molecular methods for stream macroinvertebrate biodiversity assessment across seven watersheds in the southern United States
    D. C. Allen, Z. G. Compson, C. Smith +22
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEcologybioRxiv
  4. Bottlenecked but Booming: Strong Inbreeding in a Highly Invasive Freshwater Mussel
    Antti Miettinen, Emma Sejrskild Jensen, Johanne Gottenborg +4
    Molecular ecologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  5. A New Genus and Two New Species of Freshwater Crab (Crustacea: Brachyura: Potamidae) with Unusual Coiled Tip of Male Second Gonopods from Yunnan, Southwestern China
    Chao Huang, Jian Wang, Hsi‐Te Shih
    PubMed CentralPeer-reviewedLicence not stated8 citedEcologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{jager2026data,
  title = {{Data centers: an emerging threat to freshwater biodiversity in the United States}},
  author = {Henriette Jager and Hyun Seok Yoon},
  journal = {Water Biology and Security},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1016/j.watbs.2026.100585},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watbs.2026.100585},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Data centers: an emerging threat to freshwater biodiversity in the United States
AU  - Henriette Jager
AU  - Hyun Seok Yoon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
JO  - Water Biology and Security
DO  - 10.1016/j.watbs.2026.100585
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watbs.2026.100585
AB  - This study lays the foundation for future research to quantify data center (DC) impacts on freshwater biodiversity in the US. The proliferation of DCs is increasing energy and water stress in the US. Although past research has quantified the water and carbon dimensions of sustainability associated with DCs, the potential threats to aquatic biodiversity from DCs in the US have yet to be examined. We present a risk-assessment framework for understanding potential stresses on aquatic biota, including direct effects of water cooling and indirect effects mediated by electricity from two sources: thermoelectric and hydroelectric power. For DCs using thermoelectric power, we conducted a screening-level analysis to identify areas of overlap between areas with a high DC water-scarcity footprint and aquatic biodiversity. As subbasins draining to the Atlantic Ocean and the Great Lakes support higher fish and mussel diversity, DCs could potentially expose more species to the impacts of water scarcity. Similarly, subbasins draining to the Atlantic support high human population densities (water demand) and fish richness. To reduce climate impacts and water stress, some DCs are turning to hydropower. However, this option also has the potential to increase risk to aquatic biota. Higher demand for hydropower from DCs in summer is likely to worsen the effects of climate warming on aquatic ecosystems. In addition, night-time generation to meet 24/7 DC demand could increase entrainment of small fish and larvae. Finally, if non-powered dams are relicensed to support DCs, economic justifications for dam removal will be weakened with adverse consequences for diadromous fishes, mussels, and other aquatic biota. In addition to highlighting broad geographic patterns, we use case studies to illustrate examples of DCs sourcing (or proposing to source) electricity from thermoelectric, existing hydropower plants, and the addition of turbines to non-powered dams. We conclude with a brief discussion of mitigation options for the DC industry that might improve sustainability from the perspective of freshwater biota.
SN  - 2772-7351
ER  -