Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Scientific Reports
Accuracy and clinical performance of conventional versus digital impressions for maxillary complete dentures: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Related
- Comparative clinical performance of stainless steel crowns placed using conventional, hall, and modified Hall techniques in carious primary molars: A three-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial
- Crestal Versus Lateral Window Approaches for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Effectiveness of platelet concentrates, corticotomy, and piezocision as adjuncts for accelerating maxillary canine retraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
- “Effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations in accelerating maxillary canine retraction in Angle Class I malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial”
- Transfascial Paraspinal Versus Conventional Open Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BibTeX
@article{habash2026accuracy,
title = {{Accuracy and clinical performance of conventional versus digital impressions for maxillary complete dentures: a randomized controlled clinical trial}},
author = {Mohammad Murhaf Habash and Ammar Almustafa and Hasan Alzoubi},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-75157-0},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75157-0},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Accuracy and clinical performance of conventional versus digital impressions for maxillary complete dentures: a randomized controlled clinical trial
AU - Mohammad Murhaf Habash
AU - Ammar Almustafa
AU - Hasan Alzoubi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-75157-0
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-75157-0
SN - 2045-2322
ER -