Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Dietary Sulfur Amino Acid Sensing and Metabolic Adaptation: From the GCN2–ATF4–FGF21 Axis to Transsulfuration and Redox Homeostasis

  1. 1Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry and Clinical Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu-Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  2. 2Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu-Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  3. 3Department of Medical Biochemistry, “Iuliu-Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

Sulfur amino acids (SAAs), mainly methionine and cysteine, play an important role in coordinating nutrient sensing, one-carbon metabolism, redox regulation, and whole-body energy homeostasis. Dietary methionine restriction (MR) and sulfur amino acid restriction (SAAR) have gained increasing interest as nutritional interventions that produce pronounced metabolic benefits in preclinical models, including reductions in adiposity and hepatic lipid accumulation and improvements in insulin sensitivity and glucose regulation. Human intervention studies suggest biological activity and potential metabolic benefit, although the available clinical evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. These effects arise from the coordinated activation of multiple nutrient-responsive pathways. Reduced amino acid availability can stimulate the general control nonderepressible 2–eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha–activating transcription factor 4 signaling pathway (GCN2–eIF2α–ATF4) integrated stress response, whereas changes in methionine-derived S-adenosylmethionine modulate mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity through S-adenosylmethionine sensor upstream of mTORC1 (SAMTOR)-dependent signaling. At the systemic level, hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 contributes to the regulation of adipose tissue remodeling, energy expenditure, thermogenesis, and insulin sensitivity. At the same time, alterations in transsulfuration reshape cysteine utilization, glutathione metabolism, hydrogen sulfide signaling, and mitochondrial redox adaptation. Importantly, selective MR, broader SAAR, and total protein restriction should not be considered equivalent interventions, as their metabolic effects are influenced by cysteine availability and the degree of restriction. Nevertheless, the translation of these effects to humans remains incompletely established, and available intervention studies are limited in number, duration, and sample size. This review examines the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying SAA sensing and metabolic adaptation and evaluates their potential relevance to obesity, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, with particular emphasis on future applications in precision nutrition.

Related

  1. Association of Dietary Insulin Index and Load With Glucose Homeostasis Markers, C‐Peptide and Novel Metabolic Indices (TyG‐BMI and METS‐IR) in Physically Active Young Population
    Negin Nikrad, Nazila Farrin, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
    Endocrinology, Diabetes & MetabolismPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Metabolic Health: Insights from Dietary Quality, Cardiometabolic Outcomes, and Food Environments
    Evelien Mertens, Peter Deriemaeker
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  3. Nutritional Management of Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome: Current Evidence on Dietary Strategies, Supplementation, and Lifestyle Support
    Marek Murawski, Agata Góral, Marta Maria Miszczak +1
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  4. Dietary inflammatory index in relation to metabolic health status, serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and adropin in Iranian adults
    Zahra Moradmand, Farnaz Shahdadian, Parisa Rouhani +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Comparative effects of supervised aerobic and combined training with dietary counseling on metabolic biomarkers in sedentary adult male bank employees: a randomized controlled trial
    Abrham Abebe, Alemmebrat Kiflu, Zeru Bekele
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{lucaciu2026dietary,
  title = {{Dietary Sulfur Amino Acid Sensing and Metabolic Adaptation: From the GCN2–ATF4–FGF21 Axis to Transsulfuration and Redox Homeostasis}},
  author = {Roxana Liana Lucaciu and Adriana Corina Hangan and Lucia Maria Procopciuc},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18203382},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3382},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dietary Sulfur Amino Acid Sensing and Metabolic Adaptation: From the GCN2–ATF4–FGF21 Axis to Transsulfuration and Redox Homeostasis
AU  - Roxana Liana Lucaciu
AU  - Adriana Corina Hangan
AU  - Lucia Maria Procopciuc
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18203382
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3382
AB  - Sulfur amino acids (SAAs), mainly methionine and cysteine, play an important role in coordinating nutrient sensing, one-carbon metabolism, redox regulation, and whole-body energy homeostasis. Dietary methionine restriction (MR) and sulfur amino acid restriction (SAAR) have gained increasing interest as nutritional interventions that produce pronounced metabolic benefits in preclinical models, including reductions in adiposity and hepatic lipid accumulation and improvements in insulin sensitivity and glucose regulation. Human intervention studies suggest biological activity and potential metabolic benefit, although the available clinical evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. These effects arise from the coordinated activation of multiple nutrient-responsive pathways. Reduced amino acid availability can stimulate the general control nonderepressible 2–eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha–activating transcription factor 4 signaling pathway (GCN2–eIF2α–ATF4) integrated stress response, whereas changes in methionine-derived S-adenosylmethionine modulate mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity through S-adenosylmethionine sensor upstream of mTORC1 (SAMTOR)-dependent signaling. At the systemic level, hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 contributes to the regulation of adipose tissue remodeling, energy expenditure, thermogenesis, and insulin sensitivity. At the same time, alterations in transsulfuration reshape cysteine utilization, glutathione metabolism, hydrogen sulfide signaling, and mitochondrial redox adaptation. Importantly, selective MR, broader SAAR, and total protein restriction should not be considered equivalent interventions, as their metabolic effects are influenced by cysteine availability and the degree of restriction. Nevertheless, the translation of these effects to humans remains incompletely established, and available intervention studies are limited in number, duration, and sample size. This review examines the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying SAA sensing and metabolic adaptation and evaluates their potential relevance to obesity, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, with particular emphasis on future applications in precision nutrition.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -