Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of gastrointestinal cancer

Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with BRAF Mutations Undergoing Targeted Chemotherapy: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

7 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, United States. [email protected].
  2. 2Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
  3. 3Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
  4. 4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
  5. 5Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  6. 6Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  7. 7Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, United States.

Abstract

Background

BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) represents an aggressive molecular subtype associated with poor prognosis and limited response to conventional chemotherapy. Although multiple targeted strategies, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and BRAF-directed therapies, are used in clinical practice, their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. We performed a reconstructed individual patient-data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate survival outcomes across targeted therapeutic classes in BRAF-mutant mCRC.Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted through July 2025 to identify RCTs reporting survival outcomes for BRAF-mutant mCRC. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and IPD reconstructed using established methods. A one-stage meta-analysis using Cox proportional hazards models was performed to estimate pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Models were adjusted for study-level covariates and clustering, with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons.Results

Eighteen RCTs comprising 11,931 participants were included. Pooled median OS was 22.3 months for BRAF-directed regimens, 17.1 months for VEGF-targeted therapy, and 10.1 months for EGFR-directed therapy across studies evaluating first-line therapy. Across first-line studies, BRAF inhibitor directed regimen was associated with significantly improved OS compared with EGFR inhibition (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.60; P < 0.001) and improved PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.42-0.53; P < 0.001). VEGF inhibition also demonstrated superior OS compared with EGFR inhibition (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.81; p < 0.001). EGFR-directed regimen consistently demonstrated the poorest survival outcomes across analyses.Discussion

In this reconstructed IPD meta-analysis, BRAF-directed therapies were associated with the most favourable survival outcomes, whereas EGFR directed regimen demonstrated limited clinical benefit in BRAF-mutant mCRC. These results highlight the importance of biologically aligned pathway-targeted therapy and provide comparative evidence to inform treatment selection in this aggressive molecular subtype.

Related

  1. Dual Checkpoint Inhibition With or Without Chemotherapy in Metastatic NSCLC: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
    Skyler Taylor, Isadora Mamede, Gabriela Gazzoni +6
    JTO clinical and research reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yihui Zhang, Ning Ding, Yingchao Cui +2
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Routine Versus Deferred Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-analysis With Reconstructed Individual Patient Data
    Mahmoud Balata, Ahmed Samy Badran, Mohamed Ibrahim Gbreel +10
    Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClinical trials & evidence synthesisPMCEurope PMC
  4. Relative dose intensity of first-line triplet chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Julien Hoba, Adrien Grancher, Vincent Hautefeuille +17
    Digestive and Liver DiseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text6 citedOncologyHAL
  5. [Comment] Tumor debulking in combination with chemotherapy in multiorgan metastatic colorectal cancer: the ORCHESTRA randomized clinical trial
    Zhang Rongxin
    结直肠肛门外科Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{kazmi2026survival,
  title = {{Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with BRAF Mutations Undergoing Targeted Chemotherapy: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.}},
  author = {Syeda Kanza Kazmi and Muhammad Abdul Rehman and Hanaa Tariq and Aqsa Kabir and Jalib Ahmed and Nelson Shu-Sang S Yee},
  journal = {Journal of gastrointestinal cancer},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s12029-026-01597-6},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42957919},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with BRAF Mutations Undergoing Targeted Chemotherapy: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
AU  - Syeda Kanza Kazmi
AU  - Muhammad Abdul Rehman
AU  - Hanaa Tariq
AU  - Aqsa Kabir
AU  - Jalib Ahmed
AU  - Nelson Shu-Sang S Yee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
DO  - 10.1007/s12029-026-01597-6
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42957919
AB  - Background  BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) represents an aggressive molecular subtype associated with poor prognosis and limited response to conventional chemotherapy. Although multiple targeted strategies, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and BRAF-directed therapies, are used in clinical practice, their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. We performed a reconstructed individual patient-data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate survival outcomes across targeted therapeutic classes in BRAF-mutant mCRC.Methods  A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted through July 2025 to identify RCTs reporting survival outcomes for BRAF-mutant mCRC. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and IPD reconstructed using established methods. A one-stage meta-analysis using Cox proportional hazards models was performed to estimate pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Models were adjusted for study-level covariates and clustering, with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons.Results  Eighteen RCTs comprising 11,931 participants were included. Pooled median OS was 22.3 months for BRAF-directed regimens, 17.1 months for VEGF-targeted therapy, and 10.1 months for EGFR-directed therapy across studies evaluating first-line therapy. Across first-line studies, BRAF inhibitor directed regimen was associated with significantly improved OS compared with EGFR inhibition (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.60; P < 0.001) and improved PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.42-0.53; P < 0.001). VEGF inhibition also demonstrated superior OS compared with EGFR inhibition (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.81; p < 0.001). EGFR-directed regimen consistently demonstrated the poorest survival outcomes across analyses.Discussion  In this reconstructed IPD meta-analysis, BRAF-directed therapies were associated with the most favourable survival outcomes, whereas EGFR directed regimen demonstrated limited clinical benefit in BRAF-mutant mCRC. These results highlight the importance of biologically aligned pathway-targeted therapy and provide comparative evidence to inform treatment selection in this aggressive molecular subtype.
SN  - 1941-6628
SN  - 1941-6636
ER  -