Unpacking Ethical, Privacy, And Governance Risks in AI-IoT Based Healthcare Environments: A thematic analysis
4 affiliations
- 1Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
- 2Department of Management Studies, COEP, Technological University, Pune, India
- 3Dibrugarh University, Assam, India
- 4Nootan College of Nursing, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, India
Abstract
Objective: The paper aimed to examine ethical, privacy, and governance challenges in AI-IoT (Artificial Intelligence-based Internet of Things) healthcare environments.
Design: A total of 39 peer-reviewed open-access studies were screened and used for a systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. A multi-stage thematic analysis was used for identifying recurring patterns within the literature and answering the research questions.
Results/outcomes: The identified challenges in the AI-IoT healthcare ecosystems, arising from the thematic analysis, are privacy and continuous surveillance, algorithmic bias and lack of explainability, limitations for informed consent, and fragmented governance and accountability.
Conclusion: The findings, in sync with STS theory, indicate that challenges in AI-IoT healthcare systems cannot be addressed solely through technological innovations. In response, the study proposed an Integrated Human-Centric Trust Framework to integrate human intervention with technological advancements.
Related
- AI-enabled and comparator digital interventions for adolescent mental health (2020–2025): early detection, human–AI collaboration, and ethical governance—a PRISMA-ScR scoping review
- Social and ethical implications of AI-based facial technologies in medicine and healthcare: a scoping review
- Knowledge, Awareness, and Perception toward Ethical Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Research and Healthcare among Dental Faculty and Postgraduates – A Cross-sectional Study
- Ethical Pragmatism in Healthcare Management: A Multidimensional Framework for Responsible Decision-Making Under Real-World Constraints.
- Balancing innovation and ethics: responsible governance of artificial intelligence hallucinations in healthcare.
BibTeX
@article{jaya2026unpacking,
title = {{Unpacking Ethical, Privacy, And Governance Risks in AI-IoT Based Healthcare Environments: A thematic analysis}},
author = {Joana Jaya and Asmat Ara Shaikh and Pankaj Sahu and B. Mahalakshmi and Olina Jaya},
journal = {Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.24083/apjhm.v21i2.5921},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v21i2.5921},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Unpacking Ethical, Privacy, And Governance Risks in AI-IoT Based Healthcare Environments: A thematic analysis
AU - Joana Jaya
AU - Asmat Ara Shaikh
AU - Pankaj Sahu
AU - B. Mahalakshmi
AU - Olina Jaya
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
DO - 10.24083/apjhm.v21i2.5921
UR - https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v21i2.5921
AB - Objective: The paper aimed to examine ethical, privacy, and governance challenges in AI-IoT (Artificial Intelligence-based Internet of Things) healthcare environments. Design: A total of 39 peer-reviewed open-access studies were screened and used for a systematic review using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. A multi-stage thematic analysis was used for identifying recurring patterns within the literature and answering the research questions. Results/outcomes: The identified challenges in the AI-IoT healthcare ecosystems, arising from the thematic analysis, are privacy and continuous surveillance, algorithmic bias and lack of explainability, limitations for informed consent, and fragmented governance and accountability. Conclusion: The findings, in sync with STS theory, indicate that challenges in AI-IoT healthcare systems cannot be addressed solely through technological innovations. In response, the study proposed an Integrated Human-Centric Trust Framework to integrate human intervention with technological advancements.
SN - 1833-3818
SN - 2204-3136
ER -