Add-on sirolimus in refractory iMCD-TAFRO: a TAFRO-enriched 8-patient case series with paired single-cell profiling
7 affiliations
- 1Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
- 2Clinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital
- 3Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic
- 4Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Pennsylvania
- 5Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
- 6DEJIMA Infectious Disease Research Alliance (DIDA), Nagasaki University
- 7Biomedical Research and Career Support Office, Nagasaki University
Abstract
Introduction: Anti–IL-6 therapy with tocilizumab (TCZ) is ineffective in a proportion of patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD), particularly the TAFRO subtype, and rescue options remain limited. Evidence for mTOR inhibition comes mainly from cohorts in which iMCD-TAFRO was underrepresented.
Methods: Eight Japanese patients with refractory iMCD (iMCD-TAFRO, n=6; iMCD-NOS, n=1) or TAFRO syndrome without iMCD (n=1) received add-on sirolimus (1–2 mg/day). Five had active refractory iMCD-TAFRO at initiation and formed the efficacy set; Case 5 (sirolimus for glucocorticoid sparing), Case 1 (iMCD-NOS) and Case 3 (TAFRO syndrome without iMCD) are reported descriptively. Response was defined as improvement in at least one refractory feature (CRP <0.3 mg/dL, platelets >15×10 ⁴ /µL, improvement of anasarca, or a ≥50% rise in eGFR) at 3 and 12 months.
Results: In the efficacy set, 4/5 responded at 3 months (80%; 95% CI 28–99) and 3/4 evaluable at 12 months (75%; 95% CI 19–99); a prespecified TAFRO-phenotype analysis (n=6, including Case 3) gave 5/6 (83%; 95% CI 36–100) and 4/5 evaluable (80%; 95% CI 28–99). Under a prespecified stringent definition additionally requiring CRP normalization and no escalation of concomitant immunosuppression, proportions fell to 3/5 (60%) and 2/4 evaluable (50%), each reclassification resting on a single criterion. All six responders eventually discontinued sirolimus without relapse during available follow-up. Glucocorticoids were withdrawn in all four responders receiving prednisolone, TCZ intervals were extended to ≥5 weeks in three patients, and both patients with dialysis-dependent active disease stopped hemodialysis. Exploratory paired single-cell RNA sequencing in one TAFRO-phenotype patient showed reductions in inflammatory monocytes and B cells with lower cytotoxic and proliferative programs.
Discussion: Given the very small sample, wide confidence intervals and the sensitivity of the estimates to the response definition, add-on sirolimus should be regarded as a hypothesis-generating adjunctive rescue option on top of standard treatment, not a substitute, in refractory iMCD-TAFRO.
Related
- Refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bronchopulmonary Infection After Lung Transplantation for Common Variable Immunodeficiency Despite Maximal Treatment Including IgM/IgA-Enriched Immunoglobulins and Bacteriophage Therapy
- Gefitinib-based therapy in refractory hepatocellular carcinoma with EGFR overexpression: a spatial profiling-guided case report
- Exploring recurrent urinary tract infection: paired microbiota and culture-based profiling reveals stable dysbiosis and multidrug-resistant, virulence-enriched uropathogens
- Time-series transcriptome and metabolome profiling reveals GhWRKY33 as positive regulator in cotton response to Verticillium dahliae infection
- Conditionally Reprogrammed Patient-Derived Nasal Epithelial Cell Cultures for In Vitro Diagnostics and Pharmacological Profiling in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia
BibTeX
@article{sumiyoshi2026addon,
title = {{Add-on sirolimus in refractory iMCD-TAFRO: a TAFRO-enriched 8-patient case series with paired single-cell profiling}},
author = {Remi Sumiyoshi and Tomohiro Koga and Toru Michitsuji and Masataka Umeda and Ayuko Takatani and Yoshito Nishimura and David C Fajgenbaum and Frits van Rhee and Atsushi Kawakami},
journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1963440},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1963440/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Add-on sirolimus in refractory iMCD-TAFRO: a TAFRO-enriched 8-patient case series with paired single-cell profiling
AU - Remi Sumiyoshi
AU - Tomohiro Koga
AU - Toru Michitsuji
AU - Masataka Umeda
AU - Ayuko Takatani
AU - Yoshito Nishimura
AU - David C Fajgenbaum
AU - Frits van Rhee
AU - Atsushi Kawakami
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - Frontiers in Immunology
DO - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1963440
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1963440/full
AB - Introduction: Anti–IL-6 therapy with tocilizumab (TCZ) is ineffective in a proportion of patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD), particularly the TAFRO subtype, and rescue options remain limited. Evidence for mTOR inhibition comes mainly from cohorts in which iMCD-TAFRO was underrepresented. Methods: Eight Japanese patients with refractory iMCD (iMCD-TAFRO, n=6; iMCD-NOS, n=1) or TAFRO syndrome without iMCD (n=1) received add-on sirolimus (1–2 mg/day). Five had active refractory iMCD-TAFRO at initiation and formed the efficacy set; Case 5 (sirolimus for glucocorticoid sparing), Case 1 (iMCD-NOS) and Case 3 (TAFRO syndrome without iMCD) are reported descriptively. Response was defined as improvement in at least one refractory feature (CRP <0.3 mg/dL, platelets >15×10 ⁴ /µL, improvement of anasarca, or a ≥50% rise in eGFR) at 3 and 12 months. Results: In the efficacy set, 4/5 responded at 3 months (80%; 95% CI 28–99) and 3/4 evaluable at 12 months (75%; 95% CI 19–99); a prespecified TAFRO-phenotype analysis (n=6, including Case 3) gave 5/6 (83%; 95% CI 36–100) and 4/5 evaluable (80%; 95% CI 28–99). Under a prespecified stringent definition additionally requiring CRP normalization and no escalation of concomitant immunosuppression, proportions fell to 3/5 (60%) and 2/4 evaluable (50%), each reclassification resting on a single criterion. All six responders eventually discontinued sirolimus without relapse during available follow-up. Glucocorticoids were withdrawn in all four responders receiving prednisolone, TCZ intervals were extended to ≥5 weeks in three patients, and both patients with dialysis-dependent active disease stopped hemodialysis. Exploratory paired single-cell RNA sequencing in one TAFRO-phenotype patient showed reductions in inflammatory monocytes and B cells with lower cytotoxic and proliferative programs. Discussion: Given the very small sample, wide confidence intervals and the sensitivity of the estimates to the response definition, add-on sirolimus should be regarded as a hypothesis-generating adjunctive rescue option on top of standard treatment, not a substitute, in refractory iMCD-TAFRO.
SN - 1664-3224
ER -