Proteomic markers of colorectal cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
- 1International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, Lyon, France
Abstract
1.BackgroundCirculating proteins are promising biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk. Most studies combine colon and rectal cancer despite their biological differences.
ObjectiveTo identify proteins associated with colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer risk and triangulate findings using cross-cohort confirmation and Mendelian randomisation (MR).
DesignWe profiled 6,402 proteins, using the SomaScan 7K assay in a case-cohort study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC; 658 colon and 319 rectal cancers). Cox models identified proteins associated with cancer risk at a false discovery rate <5%. Findings were confirmed in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC; SomaScan; 235 colon, 36 rectal) and UK Biobank (Olink Explore; 321 colon, 164 rectal). MR and genetic colocalisation evaluated potential causality.
ResultsWe identified 36 proteins associated with colorectal cancer, 50 with colon cancer, and 2 with rectal cancer; 20 of the 36 were also associated with colon cancer and none with rectal cancer, and no protein was associated with both sites. Seven of the 40 colon cancer proteins available in ARIC were confirmed, including COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, TFF3, and THIK. Of these, MIC-1/GDF15 and TFF3 were also confirmed in UK Biobank. COMP was inversely associated with colon cancer risk observationally and in MR analyses.
ConclusionColon and rectal cancers have different pre-diagnostic proteomic profiles, underlining the need for site-specific analyses. COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, and TFF3 were the most robustly supported biomarkers of colon cancer risk. Future work should prioritise experimental validation of these associations and use of repeated measures to define timing.
2. Key messagesWhat is already known on this topic: Circulating proteins have been linked to colorectal cancer risk, but few have been validated prospectively and most studies have combined colon and rectal cancer despite their recognised biological differences.
What this study adds: Colon and rectal cancers had distinct pre-diagnostic proteomic profiles with no overlapping associations, and the colorectal cancer signal was driven almost entirely by colon cancer. COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, and TFF3 were associated with colon cancer risk in EPIC and confirmed in independent cohorts, with genetic support for COMP.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Proteomic studies of colorectal cancer should be analysed by anatomical site, and COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, and TFF3 warrant experimental validation as markers of colon cancer risk.
Related
- Meat Intake and Risk of Gastric and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition ( EPIC ) Study
- EPIC4ND—European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition follow-up for neurodegenerative diseases
- European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) steatotic liver disease special interest group position paper on screening, diagnosis and investigation of paediatric metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease
- Plasma proteomic profiles associated with low-dose computed tomography findings and incident lung cancer: a prospective pilot study
- A clinically annotated proteomic and histological resource of 1,000 colorectal cancers
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026proteomic,
title = {{Proteomic markers of colorectal cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition}},
author = {M. A. Lee and V. Viallon and D. C. Muller and Z. Wang and N. Murphy and J. Yarmolinsky and A. J. Cross and P. Ferrari and P. Jakszyn and M. Jenab and P. M. Kolijn and G. Masala and D. Pali and S. Panico and U. Peters and C. Sacerdote and K. Smith-Byrne and R. C. Travis and K. K. Tsilidis and R. Tumino and B. Van-Guelpen and R. Vermeulen and M. Verschuren and N. Wareham and N. Chatterjee and E. Platz and E. Riboli and M. J. Gunter},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.05.26364761},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.05.26364761v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Proteomic markers of colorectal cancer risk: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
AU - M. A. Lee
AU - V. Viallon
AU - D. C. Muller
AU - Z. Wang
AU - N. Murphy
AU - J. Yarmolinsky
AU - A. J. Cross
AU - P. Ferrari
AU - P. Jakszyn
AU - M. Jenab
AU - P. M. Kolijn
AU - G. Masala
AU - D. Pali
AU - S. Panico
AU - U. Peters
AU - C. Sacerdote
AU - K. Smith-Byrne
AU - R. C. Travis
AU - K. K. Tsilidis
AU - R. Tumino
AU - B. Van-Guelpen
AU - R. Vermeulen
AU - M. Verschuren
AU - N. Wareham
AU - N. Chatterjee
AU - E. Platz
AU - E. Riboli
AU - M. J. Gunter
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.05.26364761
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.05.26364761v1
AB - 1.BackgroundCirculating proteins are promising biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk. Most studies combine colon and rectal cancer despite their biological differences. ObjectiveTo identify proteins associated with colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer risk and triangulate findings using cross-cohort confirmation and Mendelian randomisation (MR). DesignWe profiled 6,402 proteins, using the SomaScan 7K assay in a case-cohort study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC; 658 colon and 319 rectal cancers). Cox models identified proteins associated with cancer risk at a false discovery rate <5%. Findings were confirmed in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC; SomaScan; 235 colon, 36 rectal) and UK Biobank (Olink Explore; 321 colon, 164 rectal). MR and genetic colocalisation evaluated potential causality. ResultsWe identified 36 proteins associated with colorectal cancer, 50 with colon cancer, and 2 with rectal cancer; 20 of the 36 were also associated with colon cancer and none with rectal cancer, and no protein was associated with both sites. Seven of the 40 colon cancer proteins available in ARIC were confirmed, including COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, TFF3, and THIK. Of these, MIC-1/GDF15 and TFF3 were also confirmed in UK Biobank. COMP was inversely associated with colon cancer risk observationally and in MR analyses. ConclusionColon and rectal cancers have different pre-diagnostic proteomic profiles, underlining the need for site-specific analyses. COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, and TFF3 were the most robustly supported biomarkers of colon cancer risk. Future work should prioritise experimental validation of these associations and use of repeated measures to define timing. 2. Key messagesWhat is already known on this topic: Circulating proteins have been linked to colorectal cancer risk, but few have been validated prospectively and most studies have combined colon and rectal cancer despite their recognised biological differences. What this study adds: Colon and rectal cancers had distinct pre-diagnostic proteomic profiles with no overlapping associations, and the colorectal cancer signal was driven almost entirely by colon cancer. COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, and TFF3 were associated with colon cancer risk in EPIC and confirmed in independent cohorts, with genetic support for COMP. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Proteomic studies of colorectal cancer should be analysed by anatomical site, and COMP, MIC-1/GDF15, and TFF3 warrant experimental validation as markers of colon cancer risk.
ER -