Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
188,932 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Hiatal Hernia Size and De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  1. 1Hospital Central Norte de Petroleos Mexicanos

Abstract

BackgroundSleeve gastrectomy is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide but is associated with the development of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Hiatal hernia has been identified as a relevant anatomical factor in postoperative reflux, although most studies evaluate it dichotomously without analyzing whether its size influences GERD risk. The aim was to evaluate the association between preoperative hiatal hernia size and de novo GERD after sleeve gastrectomy.

MethodsRetrospective, single-center, observational study of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy at Hospital Central Norte de Petroleos Mexicanos (2018-2025). Demographic and clinical characteristics, endoscopic classification of hiatal hernia size (small <2 cm, medium 2.1-4 cm, large >4 cm), and evidence of de novo GERD were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fishers exact test, odds ratio (OR) estimation with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and binary logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

ResultsFifty-six patients were included (mean age 48.3 {+/-} 8.1 years; 67.9% male). Hiatal hernia classification was conclusive in 46 patients (82.1%): 63.0% no hernia, 4.3% small, 30.4% medium, and 2.2% large. De novo GERD occurred in 14.0% of patients without preexisting GERD (6/43). No significant association was found between hiatal hernia size and de novo GERD (Fisher p=0.515). In the reduced logistic model, neither hiatal hernia (medium/large vs. absent/small; OR 3.47; 95% CI 0.50- 29.43; p=0.207) nor age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.90-1.13; p=0.754) was significantly associated. No evaluated factor (sex, smoking, alcohol, age) reached significance.

ConclusionsIn this cohort, no statistically significant association was demonstrated between preoperative hiatal hernia size and de novo GERD after sleeve gastrectomy; however, the low number of events limits the ability to exclude a clinically relevant association. These findings are compatible with a multifactorial mechanism rather than with the isolated presence of this finding. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes and standardized reflux assessment instruments are required to confirm these results.

Related

  1. Hiatal Hernia and Conclusive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Size Matters
    Juan S. Hernández, Albis C. Hani, Oscar M. Muñoz +5
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and MotilityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Laparoscopic repair of a type IV giant hiatal hernia with pancreatic prolapse using a Permacol biological implant
    O. Yu. Usenko, Ya. Yu. Voitiv, O. S. Tyvonchuk +2
    Український журнал клінічної хірургіїPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  3. FeNO may serve as a noninvasive screening tool for gastroesophageal reflux disease in children under 5 years: a retrospective study.
    Fang Wang, Ying Cheng, Xiaoqin Zhou +5
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Association between anesthetic fresh gas flow and postoperative inflammatory response in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy : A retrospective cohort study
    Uğur Serkan Çitilcioğlu, Hatice Kaya Özdoğan
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. CT-Defined Low Skeletal Muscle Mass, Prognostic Nutritional Index, and Anemia in Relation to In-Hospital Major Morbidity After Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Mujdat Turan, Sumeyra Guler, Yasin Hatipoglu +2
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{almeida2026hiatal,
  title = {{Hiatal Hernia Size and De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study}},
  author = {E. R. Ricarte Almeida and C. J. Mata Quintero and J. Sesma Chazaro and C. Peralta Rivera and C. D. Arteaga Gonzalez},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.31.26361833},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.26361833v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hiatal Hernia Size and De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
AU  - E. R. Ricarte Almeida
AU  - C. J. Mata Quintero
AU  - J. Sesma Chazaro
AU  - C. Peralta Rivera
AU  - C. D. Arteaga Gonzalez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.31.26361833
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.26361833v1
AB  - BackgroundSleeve gastrectomy is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide but is associated with the development of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Hiatal hernia has been identified as a relevant anatomical factor in postoperative reflux, although most studies evaluate it dichotomously without analyzing whether its size influences GERD risk. The aim was to evaluate the association between preoperative hiatal hernia size and de novo GERD after sleeve gastrectomy.  MethodsRetrospective, single-center, observational study of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy at Hospital Central Norte de Petroleos Mexicanos (2018-2025). Demographic and clinical characteristics, endoscopic classification of hiatal hernia size (small <2 cm, medium 2.1-4 cm, large >4 cm), and evidence of de novo GERD were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Fishers exact test, odds ratio (OR) estimation with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and binary logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.  ResultsFifty-six patients were included (mean age 48.3 {+/-} 8.1 years; 67.9% male). Hiatal hernia classification was conclusive in 46 patients (82.1%): 63.0% no hernia, 4.3% small, 30.4% medium, and 2.2% large. De novo GERD occurred in 14.0% of patients without preexisting GERD (6/43). No significant association was found between hiatal hernia size and de novo GERD (Fisher p=0.515). In the reduced logistic model, neither hiatal hernia (medium/large vs. absent/small; OR 3.47; 95% CI 0.50- 29.43; p=0.207) nor age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.90-1.13; p=0.754) was significantly associated. No evaluated factor (sex, smoking, alcohol, age) reached significance.  ConclusionsIn this cohort, no statistically significant association was demonstrated between preoperative hiatal hernia size and de novo GERD after sleeve gastrectomy; however, the low number of events limits the ability to exclude a clinically relevant association. These findings are compatible with a multifactorial mechanism rather than with the isolated presence of this finding. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes and standardized reflux assessment instruments are required to confirm these results.
ER  -