Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Introduction of robot-assisted double-flap esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy: an exploratory comparison with side-overlap reconstruction

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Yahaba, Iwate 0283695 Japan
  2. 2Department of Medical Safety, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Yahaba, Iwate, 0283695 Japan

Abstract

Purpose: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is a function-preserving option for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. We introduced robot-assisted valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy (VEG) using the double-flap technique (DFT) and retrospectively compared its short-term outcomes with those of side-overlap (SO) reconstruction, with particular attention to postoperative reflux and nutritional changes.

Methods: A total of 24 patients who underwent robot-assisted PG with VEG between January 2020 and July 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients underwent VEG-SO and 10 underwent VEG-DFT.

Results: Operative time, blood loss, and the incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher complications did not differ significantly between the groups. Contrast studies showed no reflux in either group. At 6 months, modified Los Angeles grade A or higher reflux esophagitis was observed in 7 of 14 patients in the SO group and 1 of 10 patients in the DFT group (50.0% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.031). No anastomotic stenosis occurred; one patient in the SO group developed anastomotic leakage. The percentage body weight loss was greater in the DFT group (P = 0.034), whereas changes in laboratory-based nutritional indices did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusion: In this small retrospective cohort, robot-assisted VEG-DFT was not associated with an apparent increase in short-term perioperative morbidity compared with VEG-SO. Reflux esophagitis was less frequent after DFT, whereas body weight loss at 6 months was greater. These findings are exploratory, and the mechanism and clinical relevance of the difference in weight loss remain uncertain.

Related

  1. Comparison of Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction and Total Gastrectomy for Stage II-III Upper Gastric Cancer: A Dual-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Jeong Ho Song, SeoYeon Wi, Yeojin Boo +10
    Journal of gastric cancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Endoscopic and Symptomatic Outcomes of Vonoprazan for Erosive Esophagitis Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Exploratory Prospective Study
    Hideharu Okanobu, Kazuki Boda, Akihiro Sakai +7
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineJ-STAGE
  3. Initial Gastrectomy Indication Is Associated with Divergent Temporal Patterns of Remnant Gastric Cancer After Billroth II Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
    Yining Sun, Bingcan Yang, Feifan Chen +3
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial on sufficiency of lymph node dissection and perioperative outcomes
    Babak Mohajeri, Nasser Malekpour Alamdari, Maryam Abbasi +1
    Langenbeck's Archives of SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  5. Timing of tummy-time introduction and developmental outcomes during the first year of life: an exploratory pilot study
    Anne H. Zachry, Faria Abdullah, Rana Assfoura +6
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{takahashi2026introduction,
  title = {{Introduction of robot-assisted double-flap esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy: an exploratory comparison with side-overlap reconstruction}},
  author = {Naoto Takahashi and Shigeaki Baba and Haruka Nikai and Ryosuke Fujisawa and Masaki Kanno and Keisuke Koeda and Hiroyuki Nitta and Akira Sasaki},
  journal = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00423-026-04193-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04193-1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Introduction of robot-assisted double-flap esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy: an exploratory comparison with side-overlap reconstruction
AU  - Naoto Takahashi
AU  - Shigeaki Baba
AU  - Haruka Nikai
AU  - Ryosuke Fujisawa
AU  - Masaki Kanno
AU  - Keisuke Koeda
AU  - Hiroyuki Nitta
AU  - Akira Sasaki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
DO  - 10.1007/s00423-026-04193-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04193-1
AB  - Purpose: Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is a function-preserving option for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. We introduced robot-assisted valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy (VEG) using the double-flap technique (DFT) and retrospectively compared its short-term outcomes with those of side-overlap (SO) reconstruction, with particular attention to postoperative reflux and nutritional changes.  Methods: A total of 24 patients who underwent robot-assisted PG with VEG between January 2020 and July 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients underwent VEG-SO and 10 underwent VEG-DFT.  Results: Operative time, blood loss, and the incidence of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher complications did not differ significantly between the groups. Contrast studies showed no reflux in either group. At 6 months, modified Los Angeles grade A or higher reflux esophagitis was observed in 7 of 14 patients in the SO group and 1 of 10 patients in the DFT group (50.0% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.031). No anastomotic stenosis occurred; one patient in the SO group developed anastomotic leakage. The percentage body weight loss was greater in the DFT group (P = 0.034), whereas changes in laboratory-based nutritional indices did not differ significantly between the groups.  Conclusion: In this small retrospective cohort, robot-assisted VEG-DFT was not associated with an apparent increase in short-term perioperative morbidity compared with VEG-SO. Reflux esophagitis was less frequent after DFT, whereas body weight loss at 6 months was greater. These findings are exploratory, and the mechanism and clinical relevance of the difference in weight loss remain uncertain.
SN  - 1435-2443
SN  - 1435-2451
ER  -