Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Techniques, Limitations, and Research Directions

  1. 1DHA Suffa University

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support cybersecurity tasks such as network

intrusion detection, malware analysis, threat intelligence, and security-operations workflows. At the

same time, AI-enabled systems introduce risks related to model opacity, adversarial manipulation,

privacy, distribution shift, and misuse of generative models. This narrative review organizes the topic

into four connected areas: AI-based detection, explainable AI (XAI), adaptive threat intelligence, and

generative AI and large language models (LLMs). Across these areas, the central engineering

challenge is not only to detect malicious activity, but to produce reliable, interpretable, and operationally

useful outputs under changing conditions. The review highlights recurring limitations in evaluation

realism, explainability, adaptation to evolving threats, and human oversight. It proposes a practical

research agenda focused on reproducible benchmarking, robustness testing, human-in-the-loop

response, privacy-aware data practices, and transparent reporting. Because this manuscript is a

narrative review rather than a systematic review, it does not claim exhaustive coverage of the literature.

A future version should document a reproducible search and screening protocol and verify all

bibliographic records before journal submission

Related

  1. A hybrid structural and artificial intelligence approach for cybersecurity situational awareness among high school students
    Abdulrahman Abdullah Arishi, Nazhatul Hafizah Kamarudin, Khairul Azmi Abu Bakar
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Integrating artificial intelligence and molecular simulation for peptide discovery: limitations, validation and decision-centered workflows
    Xu Wu, Wei Fu
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. Low-Dose CT in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Techniques, Evidence, and Clinical Impact
    TomographyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  4. Bridging the Translational Gap in Artificial Intelligence for Otology and Neurotology: Clinical Readiness, Limitations, and Research Priorities
    Pasquale Viola, Teodoro Aragona, Pietro De Luca +6
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Bioengineering: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions: A Narrative Review
    Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{shah2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Techniques, Limitations, and Research Directions}},
  author = {Syed Tabish Shah},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23450799},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23450799},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Techniques, Limitations, and Research Directions
AU  - Syed Tabish Shah
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/18
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23450799
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23450799
AB  - Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to support cybersecurity tasks such as network  intrusion detection, malware analysis, threat intelligence, and security-operations workflows. At the  same time, AI-enabled systems introduce risks related to model opacity, adversarial manipulation,  privacy, distribution shift, and misuse of generative models. This narrative review organizes the topic  into four connected areas: AI-based detection, explainable AI (XAI), adaptive threat intelligence, and  generative AI and large language models (LLMs). Across these areas, the central engineering  challenge is not only to detect malicious activity, but to produce reliable, interpretable, and operationally  useful outputs under changing conditions. The review highlights recurring limitations in evaluation  realism, explainability, adaptation to evolving threats, and human oversight. It proposes a practical  research agenda focused on reproducible benchmarking, robustness testing, human-in-the-loop  response, privacy-aware data practices, and transparent reporting. Because this manuscript is a  narrative review rather than a systematic review, it does not claim exhaustive coverage of the literature.  A future version should document a reproducible search and screening protocol and verify all  bibliographic records before journal submission
ER  -