Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

ConQEC: Concolic Testing for Quantum Error-Correcting Code Implementations

Abstract

Quantum error-correcting code (QECC) implementations are hybrid software-control systems: measured syndromes drive decoder dispatch, recovery actions, and logical checks. Existing QECC verification techniques can prove formal obligations, and general quantum testing can expose final failures, but developers still lack a scalable testing workflow that generates concrete faults and explains where a QECC repair path first diverges. This paper presents ConQEC, to our knowledge the first concolic testing framework for QECC implementations. By combining concrete (Pauli) fault replay with symbolic repair-path constraints, ConQEC generates tests that expose not only final logical failures but also fault--syndrome--decoder--recovery (FSDR) diagnostics: the injected fault, observed syndrome, decoder decision, recovery action, oracle result, and earliest divergent stage. Its symbolic encoding of Pauli faults, syndrome predicates, decoder and recovery relations, and oracle checks enables this diagnostic workflow to scale beyond exponentially increasing amplitude-level quantum-state reasoning. We implemented ConQEC and evaluated it on generated source-level QECC families and public QECC artifacts with up to thousands of qubits. ConQEC detects the seeded bug in every experimental case and reports a replay-valid, fault-localizing FSDR witness for each.

Related

  1. Self-testing of logical subspaces of quantum error-correcting codes
    Li-Yi Hsu, En-Jui Kuo
    New Journal of PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  2. Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks: Theory, Implementations, and Applications
    Léo Monbroussou, Maniraman Periyasamy, Viacheslav Kuzmin +4
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsHAL
  3. Composable logical gate error in approximate quantum error correction: reexamining gate implementations in Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes
    Lukas Brenner, Beatriz Dias, Robert Koenig
    QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  4. One generation of the Standard Model as a quantum error-correcting code
    Shiroman Prakash, K. L. Ramya
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  5. Topological Quantum Error-Correcting Thresholds of a Symmetry-Enriched Toric Code
    Jiasheng He, Ryan Thorngren
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{li2026conqec,
  title = {{ConQEC: Concolic Testing for Quantum Error-Correcting Code Implementations}},
  author = {Zihao Li and Ji Guan and Mingsheng Ying},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.31443},
  eprint = {2610.31443},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31443},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - ConQEC: Concolic Testing for Quantum Error-Correcting Code Implementations
AU  - Zihao Li
AU  - Ji Guan
AU  - Mingsheng Ying
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31443
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31443
AB  - Quantum error-correcting code (QECC) implementations are hybrid software-control systems: measured syndromes drive decoder dispatch, recovery actions, and logical checks. Existing QECC verification techniques can prove formal obligations, and general quantum testing can expose final failures, but developers still lack a scalable testing workflow that generates concrete faults and explains where a QECC repair path first diverges. This paper presents ConQEC, to our knowledge the first concolic testing framework for QECC implementations. By combining concrete (Pauli) fault replay with symbolic repair-path constraints, ConQEC generates tests that expose not only final logical failures but also fault--syndrome--decoder--recovery (FSDR) diagnostics: the injected fault, observed syndrome, decoder decision, recovery action, oracle result, and earliest divergent stage. Its symbolic encoding of Pauli faults, syndrome predicates, decoder and recovery relations, and oracle checks enables this diagnostic workflow to scale beyond exponentially increasing amplitude-level quantum-state reasoning. We implemented ConQEC and evaluated it on generated source-level QECC families and public QECC artifacts with up to thousands of qubits. ConQEC detects the seeded bug in every experimental case and reports a replay-valid, fault-localizing FSDR witness for each.
ER  -