Repairing Locally Misspecified GMM: An Empirical Bayes Approach

Abstract

Econometric models offer parsimonious but inexact approximations to data-generating processes. This paper studies the generalized method of moments (GMM) when exchangeable specification errors of order n^−1/2 contaminate the moment conditions. I develop estimators for the mean and variance of these specification errors, establishing their consistency in an asymptotic framework where the number of overidentifying restrictions grows with the sample size. These hyperparameter estimates are used to develop a feasible bias-corrected estimator of target parameters. I also propose an empirical Bayes estimator that weakly improves precision by subtracting a best linear predictor of the first-order estimation error from the bias-corrected estimator. Using a combinatorial central limit theorem, I establish asymptotic normality of both estimators and provide variance estimators that enable misspecification-aware frequentist inference. Simulation exercises indicate the procedures can meaningfully improve on standard two-stage least squares estimation when exclusion violations are present. Revisiting the influential study of Angrist and Krueger (1991), I consider an instrument set where exchangeable excludability violations are plausible. Repairing the two-stage least squares estimates of the returns to schooling moves them in the direction of ordinary least squares and reduces sensitivity to the specification of controls.

Empirical Bayes in Bayesian learning: understanding a common practice
Stefano Rizzelli, Judith Rousseau, Sonia Petrone
Journal of the American Statistical Association1 Sep 2026Peer-reviewedLicence not statedStatisticsHAL
Empirical Bayes 1-bit matrix completion
Takeru Matsuda
arXiv29 Sep 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
Robust Estimation of Prior Parameters in Normal-Normal Empirical Bayes
Manu Burson, Ryan Kessler
arXiv1 Nov 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
Beyond Tweedie's Formula: Conditional Score Modeling for Empirical Bayes Inference
Shonosuke Sugasawa, Zhigen Zhao
arXiv10 Sep 2026PreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
Empirical Bayes Rebiasing
Wanyi Ling, Sida Li, Junming Guan +1
arXiv5 Nov 2026PreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{kline2026repairing,
  title = {{Repairing Locally Misspecified GMM: An Empirical Bayes Approach}},
  author = {Patrick Kline},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.23925},
  eprint = {2608.23925},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23925},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Repairing Locally Misspecified GMM: An Empirical Bayes Approach
AU  - Patrick Kline
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.23925
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23925
AB  - Econometric models offer parsimonious but inexact approximations to data-generating processes. This paper studies the generalized method of moments (GMM) when exchangeable specification errors of order n^−1/2 contaminate the moment conditions. I develop estimators for the mean and variance of these specification errors, establishing their consistency in an asymptotic framework where the number of overidentifying restrictions grows with the sample size. These hyperparameter estimates are used to develop a feasible bias-corrected estimator of target parameters. I also propose an empirical Bayes estimator that weakly improves precision by subtracting a best linear predictor of the first-order estimation error from the bias-corrected estimator. Using a combinatorial central limit theorem, I establish asymptotic normality of both estimators and provide variance estimators that enable misspecification-aware frequentist inference. Simulation exercises indicate the procedures can meaningfully improve on standard two-stage least squares estimation when exclusion violations are present. Revisiting the influential study of Angrist and Krueger (1991), I consider an instrument set where exchangeable excludability violations are plausible. Repairing the two-stage least squares estimates of the returns to schooling moves them in the direction of ordinary least squares and reduces sensitivity to the specification of controls.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite