Agroecological transition assessment frameworks: a critical scoping review
Abstract
As the limitations of conventional agriculture become increasingly evident—ranging from environmental degradation to social inequity—the agroecological transition (AET) has emerged as an alternative and transformative pathway toward sustainable food systems. However, evaluating whether the AET achieves this objective remains methodologically challenging due to its complex, multi-dimensional nature. This scoping review analyzes 28 assessment frameworks—comprising both agroecology-specific frameworks and broader agricultural sustainability frameworks that incorporate agroecological principles—identified through a systematic PRISMA-ScR-guided search. Our analysis identified four key analytical dimensions for evaluating the frameworks, emerging inductively from the literature and empirical practice: (1) interactions between sustainability components and indicators, (2) stakeholder interactions, (3) learning produced by interactions, and (4) the participation and adaptability in the evaluation process. While many frameworks position themselves on one or more of the four analytical dimensions, only six ( Dendoncker, FoPIA-SURE-Farm, MESMIS, MMF, TAPE , and Tata-Box ) fully integrate the four of them. The majority of frameworks remain rooted in top-down, expert-led approaches, with limited capacity for participatory adaptation or facilitation of transformative learning. The findings underscore the need for more integrated, inclusive, and iterative frameworks that not only assess agroecological systems but also accompany and support the co-construction of transition pathways. Such frameworks are essential to address the systemic, contextual, and political dimensions of agroecological change. For the future, hybrid and modular designs are suggested to benefit from complementary strengths of existing frameworks and non-negotiable four design principles are defined for next generation of AET assessments.
Related
- Agroecological sheep farming systems in the Ile-de-France region: Assessment of micropollutant contamination in fodder and ewe blood, milk and urine
- Challenging the Surface Area Paradigm: A Critical Review of Low-BET Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Adsorption of Organic Water Pollutants
- Metal-organic frameworks for catalytic degradation of emerging dye contaminants in wastewater: A critical review of material design, reaction mechanisms, and engineering application
- The Essential Transition Metals Transport Systems in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Scoping Review of Emerging Targets for Antitubercular Drug Discovery
- Critical assessment of published Kalina cycle studies: cycle configuration, state-point reporting and optimisation bounds
BibTeX
@article{sean2026agroecological,
title = {{Agroecological transition assessment frameworks: a critical scoping review}},
author = {Chanmony Sean and Amaury Peeters and Genowefa Blundo Canto and Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux and Ludivine Lassois},
journal = {Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fsufs.2025.1703907},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05777488v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Agroecological transition assessment frameworks: a critical scoping review
AU - Chanmony Sean
AU - Amaury Peeters
AU - Genowefa Blundo Canto
AU - Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux
AU - Ludivine Lassois
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
DO - 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1703907
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05777488v1
AB - As the limitations of conventional agriculture become increasingly evident—ranging from environmental degradation to social inequity—the agroecological transition (AET) has emerged as an alternative and transformative pathway toward sustainable food systems. However, evaluating whether the AET achieves this objective remains methodologically challenging due to its complex, multi-dimensional nature. This scoping review analyzes 28 assessment frameworks—comprising both agroecology-specific frameworks and broader agricultural sustainability frameworks that incorporate agroecological principles—identified through a systematic PRISMA-ScR-guided search. Our analysis identified four key analytical dimensions for evaluating the frameworks, emerging inductively from the literature and empirical practice: (1) interactions between sustainability components and indicators, (2) stakeholder interactions, (3) learning produced by interactions, and (4) the participation and adaptability in the evaluation process. While many frameworks position themselves on one or more of the four analytical dimensions, only six ( Dendoncker, FoPIA-SURE-Farm, MESMIS, MMF, TAPE , and Tata-Box ) fully integrate the four of them. The majority of frameworks remain rooted in top-down, expert-led approaches, with limited capacity for participatory adaptation or facilitation of transformative learning. The findings underscore the need for more integrated, inclusive, and iterative frameworks that not only assess agroecological systems but also accompany and support the co-construction of transition pathways. Such frameworks are essential to address the systemic, contextual, and political dimensions of agroecological change. For the future, hybrid and modular designs are suggested to benefit from complementary strengths of existing frameworks and non-negotiable four design principles are defined for next generation of AET assessments.
SN - 2571-581X
ER -