Baselines Matter: Cardiovascular Baseline Procedures in Affective Psychophysiology

Abstract

A baseline is necessary to define biological reactivity in psychophysiological research. However, the conceptualization and implementation of baseline measurements are often underdescribed and weakly justified. This poses a problem because poor baseline decisions have the potential to introduce noise, reduce comparability across studies, and bias interpretations of data. In this article, we focus on laboratory studies using cardiovascular measures to examine how baselines are described and used in affective psychophysiology. To describe heterogeneity in baseline procedures, Study 1 reviewed 310 psychophysiological studies and coded baseline activities, durations, analyzed intervals, and theoretical justifications. To examine within-baseline stabilization, Study 2 analyzed the POPANE dataset to assess minute-by-minute changes in cardiovascular activity in 1,010 participants during a standard 5-minute baseline. To test whether these patterns replicated and whether baseline estimates differed across sessions, Study 3 analyzed the CEPAV dataset in 300 participants across two separate laboratory visits. Finally, to assess generalizability across a larger and more heterogeneous sample, Study 4 replicated these analyses using compiled laboratory data from 2,395 participants. Across studies, results indicate that baseline procedures vary considerably, are often insufficiently reported, and may meaningfully impact the interpretation of cardiovascular data. Although different cardiovascular indices may stabilize differently during a 5-minute baseline, findings suggest that this procedure is a reasonable, pragmatic choice and that separate-session baselines should not be assumed to be superior. More broadly, findings highlight the need for stronger justification, standardization, and reporting of baseline procedures in psychophysiological research.

Where single-cell foundation models help: a benchmark of annotation, perturbation and regulatory inference against simple baselines
F. A. Cupaioli, I. Merelli
bioRxiv3 Nov 2026PreprintAll rights reservedFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
Paleo- and historical ecology contributions to baselines for restoration and reintroductions in central Chile
Meredith Root-Bernstein, Matías Guerrero-Gatica, Natalia A Villavicencio
Regional Environmental Change31 Aug 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcology Evolutionary biologyHAL
Automatic Construction of Strong Simple Baselines
Caleb N. Ellington, Jiaqi Wang, Sohan Addagudi +1
arXiv28 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
Context-aware quantile baselines for disturbance detection in non-stationary short-rotation forest plantations
Guerric Le Maire, Florian de Boissieu, Clayton Alcarde Alvares +6
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation24 Sep 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyHAL
Avoiding spiders: Affective context shapes tactile sensitivity during movement
Belkis Ezgi Arikan, Meaghan McManus, Katja Fiehler
iScience15 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCell PressCrossrefEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{behnke2026baselines,
  title = {{Baselines Matter: Cardiovascular Baseline Procedures in Affective Psychophysiology}},
  author = {Maciej Behnke and Wadim Krzyżaniak and Szymon Jęśko-Białek and Patryk Maciejewski and Audrey-Ann Journault and Sylvia Kreibig and Jeremy Jamieson and James Gross},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/9cf6p_v2},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/9cf6p_v2/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Baselines Matter: Cardiovascular Baseline Procedures in Affective Psychophysiology
AU  - Maciej Behnke
AU  - Wadim Krzyżaniak
AU  - Szymon Jęśko-Białek
AU  - Patryk Maciejewski
AU  - Audrey-Ann Journault
AU  - Sylvia Kreibig
AU  - Jeremy Jamieson
AU  - James Gross
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/9cf6p_v2
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/9cf6p_v2/
AB  - A baseline is necessary to define biological reactivity in psychophysiological research. However, the conceptualization and implementation of baseline measurements are often underdescribed and weakly justified. This poses a problem because poor baseline decisions have the potential to introduce noise, reduce comparability across studies, and bias interpretations of data. In this article, we focus on laboratory studies using cardiovascular measures to examine how baselines are described and used in affective psychophysiology. To describe heterogeneity in baseline procedures, Study 1 reviewed 310 psychophysiological studies and coded baseline activities, durations, analyzed intervals, and theoretical justifications. To examine within-baseline stabilization, Study 2 analyzed the POPANE dataset to assess minute-by-minute changes in cardiovascular activity in 1,010 participants during a standard 5-minute baseline. To test whether these patterns replicated and whether baseline estimates differed across sessions, Study 3 analyzed the CEPAV dataset in 300 participants across two separate laboratory visits. Finally, to assess generalizability across a larger and more heterogeneous sample, Study 4 replicated these analyses using compiled laboratory data from 2,395 participants. Across studies, results indicate that baseline procedures vary considerably, are often insufficiently reported, and may meaningfully impact the interpretation of cardiovascular data. Although different cardiovascular indices may stabilize differently during a 5-minute baseline, findings suggest that this procedure is a reasonable, pragmatic choice and that separate-session baselines should not be assumed to be superior. More broadly, findings highlight the need for stronger justification, standardization, and reporting of baseline procedures in psychophysiological research.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite