Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

A Quantum Phase-based Comparator

Abstract

Quantum comparators decide the order of two operands. They rely on reversible logic acting on basis-encoded integers, so their width grows with the precision. We introduce the Quantum Phase-based Comparator (QPC), which compares two values carried in relative phases instead. The circuit places the two phases, entered with opposite signs, between a pair of Hadamard gates, and a fixed offset centers the interference, so that the probability of measuring zero falls below one half exactly when the first phase is the smaller. We give two implementations. With hard-coded values, the two values are written into the parameters of two phase gates, and the comparison costs one qubit and five gates. With the register-driven cascade, the values are drawn from two t-qubit registers through binary-weighted controlled-phase gates, at a cost of one qubit beyond the registers and depth linear in t; since the cascade induces each phase linearly from the register content, one circuit handles a superposition of operand pairs. The readout yields a biased coin rather than a definite bit, and we quantify the shots that a decision takes at a given phase separation. Scaling both phases by an integer widens the decision margin at no cost in width or depth, and an adaptive doubling schedule turns this amplification into a shot count logarithmic in the inverse separation.

Related

  1. Helium-Gas-Cooled Cryogenic Current Comparator Integrated with a Quantum Resistance Standard
    Yuma Okazaki, Takehiko Oe, Nobu-Hisa Kaneko
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Enhanced dark matter quantum sensing via phase-space geometric interferometry
    Xiaolin Ma, Jie Sheng
    Physics Letters BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  3. Analytic phase solution and point vortex model for dipolar quantum vortices
    Ryan Doran, Thomas Bland
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossrefAPS
  4. Dynamical Phase Transitions as Properties of the Stationary State: Analytic Results after Quantum Quenches in the Spin-1/2 XXZ Chain
    Maurizio Fagotti
    HALPreprintLicence not statedFull text15 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsHAL
  5. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian: The imbalanced-pairing Kitaev model
    R. Jafari, Alireza Akbari, Shukhrat Mardonov +1
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{berti2026quantum,
  title = {{A Quantum Phase-based Comparator}},
  author = {Alessandro Berti and Alessandro Poggiali},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25262},
  eprint = {2609.25262},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25262},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Quantum Phase-based Comparator
AU  - Alessandro Berti
AU  - Alessandro Poggiali
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25262
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25262
AB  - Quantum comparators decide the order of two operands. They rely on reversible logic acting on basis-encoded integers, so their width grows with the precision. We introduce the Quantum Phase-based Comparator (QPC), which compares two values carried in relative phases instead. The circuit places the two phases, entered with opposite signs, between a pair of Hadamard gates, and a fixed offset centers the interference, so that the probability of measuring zero falls below one half exactly when the first phase is the smaller. We give two implementations. With hard-coded values, the two values are written into the parameters of two phase gates, and the comparison costs one qubit and five gates. With the register-driven cascade, the values are drawn from two t-qubit registers through binary-weighted controlled-phase gates, at a cost of one qubit beyond the registers and depth linear in t; since the cascade induces each phase linearly from the register content, one circuit handles a superposition of operand pairs. The readout yields a biased coin rather than a definite bit, and we quantify the shots that a decision takes at a given phase separation. Scaling both phases by an integer widens the decision margin at no cost in width or depth, and an adaptive doubling schedule turns this amplification into a shot count logarithmic in the inverse separation.
ER  -