Nudging dietary transition in Czech canteens: impacts of vegan meal introduction and label salience
Abstract
Institutional canteens can support public health by diversifying menus and ensuring genuine plant-based options. This study evaluates how the introduction of a vegan meal and labelling influenced meal selection at Charles University, Prague, addressing a research gap in Central Europe.
We analysed transaction-level data from multiple canteens between 2022 and 2024. The study utilised a quasi-experimental design across four phases: Baseline, Pilot Expansion, Expansion Unlabeled, and Expansion Labelled (explicit “VEGAN” titles). We employed two modelling frameworks: a Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) for aggregate canteen-week shares, and a multivariate Linear Probability Model with individual fixed effects to isolate within-person behavioural shifts. Aggregate results showed that increasing the number of days a vegan dish was offered per week significantly increased the vegan meal share, while reducing meat and vegetarian shares. At the transaction level, a baseline model shows that having a vegan option on a given day increases an individual’s probability of selecting a vegan option by 17.4 percentage points. Interaction models revealed significant heterogeneity: the behavioural response to daily vegan availability was 8.7 percentage points lower for men than for women. Across longitudinal phases, unlabeled availability increased vegan choice probability by 6 percentage points for women (4.2 for men), while the subsequent addition of explicit labels nearly tripled this effect to 16 points for women and 10.5 for men. While increasing the frequency of vegan offerings moderately shifts behaviour, explicit labelling acts as a primary catalyst for a significant dietary transition. Future interventions should prioritise label salience and demographic-specific tailoring to address established habits among men and older diners.
Key messages: • While vegan availability alone increases selection probability, adding explicit labels nearly triples this effect, driving significant substitution away from meat in university canteens.
• Heterogeneity in vegan meal selection among men and older diners suggests institutional nudges require demographic-specific strategies to overcome established habits.
Related
- Suboptimal Safety Practices Persist Despite Widespread Dietary Supplement and Natural Product Use During the Endemic Transition: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Diet and Cancer Risk: Global Food Systems Transition and Emerging Dietary Exposures.
- Increasing physical activity among medical inpatients by digital nudging of patients and staff (the IPAMINA trial): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised multicentre trial
- Fueling Bright Futures: a mixed-methods case study on integrating gardens, canteens, and nutrition training in philippine public schools.
- From Mortality Salience to Existential Reflection: A Four-Level Model of Reflecting Upon Personal, Human, Biotic, and Cosmic Finitude
BibTeX
@article{kmetkova2026nudging,
title = {{Nudging dietary transition in Czech canteens: impacts of vegan meal introduction and label salience}},
author = {D Kmetkova and I Zverinova and M Scasny},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.932},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.932},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Nudging dietary transition in Czech canteens: impacts of vegan meal introduction and label salience
AU - D Kmetkova
AU - I Zverinova
AU - M Scasny
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.932
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.932
AB - Institutional canteens can support public health by diversifying menus and ensuring genuine plant-based options. This study evaluates how the introduction of a vegan meal and labelling influenced meal selection at Charles University, Prague, addressing a research gap in Central Europe. We analysed transaction-level data from multiple canteens between 2022 and 2024. The study utilised a quasi-experimental design across four phases: Baseline, Pilot Expansion, Expansion Unlabeled, and Expansion Labelled (explicit “VEGAN” titles). We employed two modelling frameworks: a Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) for aggregate canteen-week shares, and a multivariate Linear Probability Model with individual fixed effects to isolate within-person behavioural shifts. Aggregate results showed that increasing the number of days a vegan dish was offered per week significantly increased the vegan meal share, while reducing meat and vegetarian shares. At the transaction level, a baseline model shows that having a vegan option on a given day increases an individual’s probability of selecting a vegan option by 17.4 percentage points. Interaction models revealed significant heterogeneity: the behavioural response to daily vegan availability was 8.7 percentage points lower for men than for women. Across longitudinal phases, unlabeled availability increased vegan choice probability by 6 percentage points for women (4.2 for men), while the subsequent addition of explicit labels nearly tripled this effect to 16 points for women and 10.5 for men. While increasing the frequency of vegan offerings moderately shifts behaviour, explicit labelling acts as a primary catalyst for a significant dietary transition. Future interventions should prioritise label salience and demographic-specific tailoring to address established habits among men and older diners. Key messages: • While vegan availability alone increases selection probability, adding explicit labels nearly triples this effect, driving significant substitution away from meat in university canteens. • Heterogeneity in vegan meal selection among men and older diners suggests institutional nudges require demographic-specific strategies to overcome established habits.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -