Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Stacked Flap and Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: Clinical Results and Patient-reported Outcomes.
- 1From the Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
Background
In autologous breast reconstruction, there may be a disparity between the volume necessary to achieve the ideal reconstruction and the volume of tissue available from a single flap donor site. In such cases, stacked flap reconstruction or hybrid breast reconstruction may provide patients with their desired breast size and shape.Methods
This retrospective cohort study included 119 patients (69 bilateral stacked flap reconstructions, 50 bilateral hybrid reconstructions) who underwent breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2024. Patient demographics, oncological treatment, and operative details were compared. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q).Results
There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities or oncological treatment plans. The hybrid reconstruction group had a shorter duration for the flap procedure (532.6 versus 637 min, P < 0.001), shorter length of stay (4.1 versus 5.1 d, P = 0.003), less frequent use of a cosurgeon (48% versus 95.6%, P < 0.001), and a higher number of total revision procedures (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in breast, donor site, or medical complications aside from a higher risk of postoperative breast infection in the hybrid reconstruction group (P = 0.011). BREAST-Q demonstrated no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes.Conclusions
Stacked flap and hybrid breast reconstructions are both safe and reliable techniques in appropriately selected patients when a single flap donor site lacks sufficient volume to achieve the desired result. There are nuanced differences in the reconstructive processes and surgical outcomes that necessitate thorough patient education and patient selection.
Related
- Three-Year Functional Vision, Longitudinal Refractive Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of the Extend Bessel-Optics Intraocular Lens: An Independent Real-World Ambispective Study
- Post-acne Erythema: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Interventions Across Clinical, Instrumental, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
- Flap reconstruction versus dermal regeneration template for finger soft-tissue defects: comparative clinical outcomes
- Patient-Reported Outcomes After Septoplasty With Bilateral Radiofrequency Inferior Turbinate Reduction: A Prospective Cohort Study.
- Cross-cultural adaptation and comparative psychometric evaluation of four patient-reported outcome measures for breast cancer-related lymphedema: measurement properties and clinical discrimination
BibTeX
@article{benedict2026comparative,
title = {{Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Stacked Flap and Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: Clinical Results and Patient-reported Outcomes.}},
author = {Katherine C Benedict and Archana Babu and Rene D Largo and Carrie K Chu and Margaret S Roubaud and Alexander F Mericli and Z-Hye Lee and Ashleigh M Francis and Edward I Chang and Arlene M Correa and J Bryce Olenczak},
journal = {Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1097/gox.0000000000008179},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903509},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Stacked Flap and Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: Clinical Results and Patient-reported Outcomes.
AU - Katherine C Benedict
AU - Archana Babu
AU - Rene D Largo
AU - Carrie K Chu
AU - Margaret S Roubaud
AU - Alexander F Mericli
AU - Z-Hye Lee
AU - Ashleigh M Francis
AU - Edward I Chang
AU - Arlene M Correa
AU - J Bryce Olenczak
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/20
JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
DO - 10.1097/gox.0000000000008179
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903509
AB - Background In autologous breast reconstruction, there may be a disparity between the volume necessary to achieve the ideal reconstruction and the volume of tissue available from a single flap donor site. In such cases, stacked flap reconstruction or hybrid breast reconstruction may provide patients with their desired breast size and shape.Methods This retrospective cohort study included 119 patients (69 bilateral stacked flap reconstructions, 50 bilateral hybrid reconstructions) who underwent breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2024. Patient demographics, oncological treatment, and operative details were compared. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q).Results There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities or oncological treatment plans. The hybrid reconstruction group had a shorter duration for the flap procedure (532.6 versus 637 min, P < 0.001), shorter length of stay (4.1 versus 5.1 d, P = 0.003), less frequent use of a cosurgeon (48% versus 95.6%, P < 0.001), and a higher number of total revision procedures (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in breast, donor site, or medical complications aside from a higher risk of postoperative breast infection in the hybrid reconstruction group (P = 0.011). BREAST-Q demonstrated no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes.Conclusions Stacked flap and hybrid breast reconstructions are both safe and reliable techniques in appropriately selected patients when a single flap donor site lacks sufficient volume to achieve the desired result. There are nuanced differences in the reconstructive processes and surgical outcomes that necessitate thorough patient education and patient selection.
SN - 2169-7574
ER -