Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Hidden selection rules and amplitude ceilings in quantum Fourier models

Abstract

Quantum models with Pauli data encodings compute trigonometric polynomials whatever channels, ancillas and outcome-averaged measurements follow, so their expressivity depends on the Fourier coefficients a circuit can reach. We identify two kinds of structure that settle this before training. An antiunitary time-reversal rule and a unitary reflection rule remove frequencies. For gate-level circuits, deciding whether such a rule exists reduces to a linear system over GF(2), solvable in polynomial time, and the time-reversal rule holds in 17.6% of 6,120 configurations of standard templates. Single-upload encodings cap the top coefficient at 2−m for every channel, and we compute the tight ceiling for every frequency and a depth-independent re-uploading bound. Frozen before training, these bounds were never violated on a non-linearity benchmark, and they predicted trained performance on real data. On IBM processors the rule held on a 65-qubit chain, and we switched rule-breaking relaxation noise on and off by design.

Related

  1. Hidden amplitude and dynamical information in phase-separation spectra
    Boliang Yu, Ruixin Zhou, Jiaxing Yuan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Coarse-Graining Hidden Representations: Unsupervised Neuron Selection via Mapping Entropy
    Margherita Mele, Andrea Castagna, Roberto Menichetti +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. Convergence Analysis of the Quantum Blahut-Arimoto Algorithm and the Contraction Coefficient of Qubit Amplitude-Damping Channels
    Junke Han, Yonglong Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Non-Orthogonal Amplitude Amplification for Hybrid CV-DV Quantum Processors
    Jiyuan Liu, Joel Bierman, Yuan Liu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Measurement-enabled online quantum processing with amplitude encoding
    Giacomo Franceschetto, Pere Mujal, Rodrigo Martínez-Peña
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{sulimov2026hidden,
  title = {{Hidden selection rules and amplitude ceilings in quantum Fourier models}},
  author = {Pavel Sulimov and Claude Lehmann},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.01314},
  eprint = {2611.01314},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01314},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hidden selection rules and amplitude ceilings in quantum Fourier models
AU  - Pavel Sulimov
AU  - Claude Lehmann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.01314
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01314
AB  - Quantum models with Pauli data encodings compute trigonometric polynomials whatever channels, ancillas and outcome-averaged measurements follow, so their expressivity depends on the Fourier coefficients a circuit can reach. We identify two kinds of structure that settle this before training. An antiunitary time-reversal rule and a unitary reflection rule remove frequencies. For gate-level circuits, deciding whether such a rule exists reduces to a linear system over GF(2), solvable in polynomial time, and the time-reversal rule holds in 17.6% of 6,120 configurations of standard templates. Single-upload encodings cap the top coefficient at 2^−m for every channel, and we compute the tight ceiling for every frequency and a depth-independent re-uploading bound. Frozen before training, these bounds were never violated on a non-linearity benchmark, and they predicted trained performance on real data. On IBM processors the rule held on a 65-qubit chain, and we switched rule-breaking relaxation noise on and off by design.
ER  -