Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Conductor-Discriminant Inequality for Tamely Ramified Cyclic Covers II

Abstract

Let K be a Henselian discretely valued field with excellent ring of integers 𝒪K and algebraically closed residue field k. Let X→ℙ1K be a cyclic cover of degree n prime to the characteristic of k. In joint work with Obus and Srinivasan (arXiv:2609.20553), we define an integer called the conductor-discriminant contribution cdc(y) associated to a multiplicity $2$ point y of the branch divisor of the normalization in K(X) of a regular 𝒪K-model 𝒴 of ℙ1K; modulo several key results about cdc(y), we prove a conductor-discriminant inequality for X, extending previous work of Ogg, Saito, Liu, Srinivasan, and Obus−Srinivasan. In this companion paper, we supply the necessary technical results for cdc(y). In particular, we show cdc(y) is non-negative except under highly restrictive conditions on n and the structure of the branch divisor at y. Moreover, if cdc(y) is negative, we show the spectrum of the complete local ring of any point lying over y under the normalization of 𝒴 in K(X) is a rational double point. Along the way, we show the non-negativity of a related quantity, the conductor exponent-discriminant contribution cedc(y), which is used in our joint work with Obus and Srinivasan to give a new proof of a result of Kohls.

Related

  1. Conductor-Discriminant Inequality for Tamely Ramified Cyclic Covers I
    Andrew Obus, Padmavathi Srinivasan, Connor Stewart
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. The Five-Point Case of Mordell's Discriminant Inequality
    Jie Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Circular Rearrangement Inequality and Optimal Cyclic Birth and Death Chains
    Gabriel Raposo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsProbabilityarXiv
  4. The Strong Naor--Schechtman Convolution Inequality on the Product of Cyclic Groups
    Yong Jiao, Sijie Luo, Dmitriy Zanin +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Brauer-Kuroda relations for ramified graph covers
    Kosuke Mizuno
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{stewart2026conductordiscriminant,
  title = {{Conductor-Discriminant Inequality for Tamely Ramified Cyclic Covers II}},
  author = {Connor Stewart},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.20585},
  eprint = {2609.20585},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20585},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Conductor-Discriminant Inequality for Tamely Ramified Cyclic Covers II
AU  - Connor Stewart
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20585
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20585
AB  - Let K be a Henselian discretely valued field with excellent ring of integers 𝒪_K and algebraically closed residue field k. Let X→ℙ^1_K be a cyclic cover of degree n prime to the characteristic of k. In joint work with Obus and Srinivasan (arXiv:2609.20553), we define an integer called the conductor-discriminant contribution cdc(y) associated to a multiplicity $2$ point y of the branch divisor of the normalization in K(X) of a regular 𝒪_K-model 𝒴 of ℙ^1_K; modulo several key results about cdc(y), we prove a conductor-discriminant inequality for X, extending previous work of Ogg, Saito, Liu, Srinivasan, and Obus−Srinivasan. In this companion paper, we supply the necessary technical results for cdc(y). In particular, we show cdc(y) is non-negative except under highly restrictive conditions on n and the structure of the branch divisor at y. Moreover, if cdc(y) is negative, we show the spectrum of the complete local ring of any point lying over y under the normalization of 𝒴 in K(X) is a rational double point. Along the way, we show the non-negativity of a related quantity, the conductor exponent-discriminant contribution cedc(y), which is used in our joint work with Obus and Srinivasan to give a new proof of a result of Kohls.
ER  -