Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Union of Translates of a Convex Body

Abstract

Let K⊂ℝd be a strictly convex body and let Z⊂ℝd be a finite set of sites in general position. We consider the problem of calculating the volume μd of ⋃z∈ Z(z−K). Let Vz be the Voronoi cell of z∈ Z with respect to the convex distance function induced by K, and let N be the nerve of the Voronoi cells. When K is a ball, a classical result reduces the inclusion-exclusion formula to a sum over N: μd(⋃z∈ Z(z−K))=∑J∈ N(−1)|J|+1μd(⋂z∈ J(z−K)). When may the hypothesis that K is a ball be dropped? We show that for d≤ 2 the reduced formula holds for every strictly convex K, while for each d≥ 3 there is a strictly convex K for which it fails. For x∈ℝd, let χx be the Euler characteristic of the subcomplex of N induced by the sites lying in K+x. A sufficient condition for the reduced formula to hold is χx≡ 1 on the union. When d=3 and K is C4, we show that χx≡ 1 on the union for all Z in general position if and only if K is an ellipsoid. The proof relies on the Fubini-Pick affine invariant.

Related

  1. Depth based on translates of a convex body: geometry, floating bodies, and empirical theory
    Ilya Molchanov, Stanislav Nagy
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyStatisticsarXiv
  2. The Strong Mankiewicz Property for Closed Convex Body in Normed Spaces
    Ruidong Wang, Jianglong Luo, Li Tang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  3. Uniqueness of four-body convex central configurations for all masses
    Tejasvi Singh Tomar
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsMathematical physicsarXiv
  4. The distributions of convex body functionals of the Poisson polyhedron
    Felix Ballani, Dietrich Stoyan
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
  5. Sharp convex body sparse bounds and quantitative matrix weighted estimates for Hilbert transforms along curves
    Xi Cen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{shelley2026union,
  title = {{Union of Translates of a Convex Body}},
  author = {Alec Shelley and Daniel Tartakovsky},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.25841},
  eprint = {2610.25841},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25841},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Union of Translates of a Convex Body
AU  - Alec Shelley
AU  - Daniel Tartakovsky
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.25841
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25841
AB  - Let K⊂ℝ^d be a strictly convex body and let Z⊂ℝ^d be a finite set of sites in general position. We consider the problem of calculating the volume μ_d of ⋃_z∈ Z(z−K). Let V_z be the Voronoi cell of z∈ Z with respect to the convex distance function induced by K, and let N be the nerve of the Voronoi cells. When K is a ball, a classical result reduces the inclusion-exclusion formula to a sum over N: μ_d(⋃_z∈ Z(z−K))=∑_J∈ N(−1)^|J|+1μ_d(⋂_z∈ J(z−K)). When may the hypothesis that K is a ball be dropped? We show that for d≤ 2 the reduced formula holds for every strictly convex K, while for each d≥ 3 there is a strictly convex K for which it fails. For x∈ℝ^d, let χ_x be the Euler characteristic of the subcomplex of N induced by the sites lying in K+x. A sufficient condition for the reduced formula to hold is χ_x≡ 1 on the union. When d=3 and K is C^4, we show that χ_x≡ 1 on the union for all Z in general position if and only if K is an ellipsoid. The proof relies on the Fubini-Pick affine invariant.
ER  -