Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Development and Primary Validation of the Vienna Post-Exertional Malaise Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract

Background: Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is increasingly understood as a multidimensional deterioration process involving diverse triggers, functional loss, and prolonged recovery. This study developed and initially validated the Vienna Post-Exertional Malaise Assessment Questionnaire (VPEM-AQ), a patient-reported outcome measure assessing PEM manifestations and functional consequences in ME/CFS.

Methods: We conducted a primary psychometric validation study in adults with ME/CFS. The VPEM-AQ assessed crash frequency, exertion thresholds across physical, cognitive, sensory, emotional-social, and orthostatic domains, crash severity, recovery duration, new or additional crash-related symptoms, and pacing behaviour. Analyses included descriptive statistics, floor and ceiling effects, factor analyses, internal consistency, convergent validity with DSQ-PEM and FUNCAP-27, and known-groups validity.

Results: The VPEM-AQ was completed by 1,108 adults; 83.0% female, median age was 46 years (IQR 36–54). The score showed no relevant floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was good for the 7-item score (Cronbach’s α = 0.82) and improved in the 6-item version excluding the weaker new-symptoms item (α = 0.87). Confirmatory factor analysis showed mixed fit, indicating that the VPEM-AQ should not be interpreted as a fully homogeneous one-dimensional scale. Convergent validity was supported by correlations with DSQ-PEM (ρ = 0.475; 95% CI 0.425–0.522) and FUNCAP-27 (ρ = −0.680; 95% CI − 0.713 to − 0.643). Known-groups validity was supported across DSQ-PEM quartiles (H = 313.3, p < 0.001) and FUNCAP-27 quartiles (H = 412.5, p < 0.001), although discrimination between the two highest DSQ-PEM quartiles was limited.

Conclusions: The VPEM-AQ showed promising but not definitive initial psychometric properties, particularly for multidomain exertion thresholds. Crash severity and recovery duration remain clinically important but require simpler or diary-based formats before scoring.

Key messages: • The VPEM-AQ is a promising new patient-reported tool to assess multidimensional post-exertional malaise in ME/CFS.

• The VPEM-AQ captures the wide variation of post-exertional malaise in ME/CFS, reflecting differences in triggers, severity, recovery, and functional impact.

Related

  1. Development, content validation and reliability assessment of the Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Transanal Irrigation: a multi-methods study
    E. Farrow, R. Balachandran, R. Embleton +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  2. Socioeconomic status assessment in Lebanese primary health care centers: development and validation of the SES-PHC scale
    Lina Traboulsi, Hala Sacre, Fatima Wehbi +12
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Development and Validation of the Food Expectation Questionnaire (FEX‐Q): An Image‐Based Instrument to Assess Food‐Related Perceptions and Symptom Expectations
    Ryo Katsumata, Stine Störsrud, Magnus Simrén +1
    Neurogastroenterology and motilityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Lifestyle, Dietary Habits, and Modifiable Risk Factors in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study with Development and Validation of a Composite Lifestyle and Nutrition Questionnaire
    Carina Gib, Alina Anton, Andreea-Adriana Neamțu +8
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and psychometric validation of the sun exposure and protection questionnaire (SEPQ) in young adults: a university-based validation study
    Sari Taha, Mohammad Darwaze, Nour Ghareeb +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{brandl2026development,
  title = {{Development and Primary Validation of the Vienna Post-Exertional Malaise Assessment Questionnaire}},
  author = {T Brandl and T Pimminger and A Schwabe and T Waldhoer and A Kapan},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1100},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1100},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and Primary Validation of the Vienna Post-Exertional Malaise Assessment Questionnaire
AU  - T Brandl
AU  - T Pimminger
AU  - A Schwabe
AU  - T Waldhoer
AU  - A Kapan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1100
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1100
AB  - Background: Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is increasingly understood as a multidimensional deterioration process involving diverse triggers, functional loss, and prolonged recovery. This study developed and initially validated the Vienna Post-Exertional Malaise Assessment Questionnaire (VPEM-AQ), a patient-reported outcome measure assessing PEM manifestations and functional consequences in ME/CFS.  Methods: We conducted a primary psychometric validation study in adults with ME/CFS. The VPEM-AQ assessed crash frequency, exertion thresholds across physical, cognitive, sensory, emotional-social, and orthostatic domains, crash severity, recovery duration, new or additional crash-related symptoms, and pacing behaviour. Analyses included descriptive statistics, floor and ceiling effects, factor analyses, internal consistency, convergent validity with DSQ-PEM and FUNCAP-27, and known-groups validity.  Results: The VPEM-AQ was completed by 1,108 adults; 83.0% female, median age was 46 years (IQR 36–54). The score showed no relevant floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was good for the 7-item score (Cronbach’s α = 0.82) and improved in the 6-item version excluding the weaker new-symptoms item (α = 0.87). Confirmatory factor analysis showed mixed fit, indicating that the VPEM-AQ should not be interpreted as a fully homogeneous one-dimensional scale. Convergent validity was supported by correlations with DSQ-PEM (ρ = 0.475; 95% CI 0.425–0.522) and FUNCAP-27 (ρ = −0.680; 95% CI − 0.713 to − 0.643). Known-groups validity was supported across DSQ-PEM quartiles (H = 313.3, p < 0.001) and FUNCAP-27 quartiles (H = 412.5, p < 0.001), although discrimination between the two highest DSQ-PEM quartiles was limited.  Conclusions: The VPEM-AQ showed promising but not definitive initial psychometric properties, particularly for multidomain exertion thresholds. Crash severity and recovery duration remain clinically important but require simpler or diary-based formats before scoring.  Key messages: • The VPEM-AQ is a promising new patient-reported tool to assess multidimensional post-exertional malaise in ME/CFS.  • The VPEM-AQ captures the wide variation of post-exertional malaise in ME/CFS, reflecting differences in triggers, severity, recovery, and functional impact.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -