Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

OmniVCBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning Towards AI Virtual Cells

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence Virtual Cells (AIVCs) are envisioned as scientific agents that simulate cellular responses, explain underlying mechanisms, and support hypothesis-driven discovery. Existing AIVC benchmarks, however, operate primarily at the simulation layer, motivating complementary evaluation of how models interpret experimental evidence and formulate biological hypotheses. We introduce OmniVCBench, a figure-centric, source-traceable benchmark for the interpretation component of an AIVC. It contains 6,077 curated single- and multi-subfigure question--answer pairs derived from figures and experimental contexts in the scientific literature. Guided by Bloom's taxonomy, we instantiate interpretation-layer counterparts of the AIVC Predict--Explain--Discover agenda through three scientific reasoning tasks. We further introduce AIVC-Judge, a task-conditioned MLLM-as-a-judge framework with category-specific, reference-aware rubrics for evaluating open-ended responses. A complementary Model-Derived Hard-Negative Mining (MDHNM) strategy converts plausible errors observed during model inference into MCQ distractors for lower-cost evaluation. Within the evaluated heterogeneous model pool, MCQ accuracy correlates positively with AIVC-Judge scores, providing a complementary view of performance alongside open-response evaluation. Code and data demo are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/OmniVCBench.

Related

  1. CellChain: Benchmarking Cross-Scale Evidence Use for Perturbation Reasoning
    Xue Xia, Yue Wang, Shuizhou Chen +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsarXiv
  2. BioPhys-Bridge: A Benchmark for Interdisciplinary Scientific Reasoning in Physics-Grounded Biological Research
    Qingyang Xu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  3. GenoMorph: Pathway-Grounded Genomic Disease Reasoning via Adaptive Latent Computation
    Tanmoy Kanti Halder, Akash Ghosh, Arijit Roy +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsarXiv
  4. TRACEDD: A Tool-grounded Reasoning and Agentic Coordination for Explainable Drug Design
    S. R. Vangala, V. V. Kasturi, N. Bung +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. BoneGraph: A Domain-Specialised, Self-Correcting Reasoning System for Bone Science Retrieval, Grounded Inference, and Image Mechanics
    J. Valijonov, P. Soar, J. Le Houx +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{li2026omnivcbench,
  title = {{OmniVCBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning Towards AI Virtual Cells}},
  author = {Manyu Li and Xunkai Li and Yongfu Xiong and Yi Liu and Rong-Hua Li and Guoren Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.37773},
  eprint = {2609.37773},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37773},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - OmniVCBench: Benchmarking Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning Towards AI Virtual Cells
AU  - Manyu Li
AU  - Xunkai Li
AU  - Yongfu Xiong
AU  - Yi Liu
AU  - Rong-Hua Li
AU  - Guoren Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.37773
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37773
AB  - Artificial Intelligence Virtual Cells (AIVCs) are envisioned as scientific agents that simulate cellular responses, explain underlying mechanisms, and support hypothesis-driven discovery. Existing AIVC benchmarks, however, operate primarily at the simulation layer, motivating complementary evaluation of how models interpret experimental evidence and formulate biological hypotheses. We introduce OmniVCBench, a figure-centric, source-traceable benchmark for the interpretation component of an AIVC. It contains 6,077 curated single- and multi-subfigure question--answer pairs derived from figures and experimental contexts in the scientific literature. Guided by Bloom's taxonomy, we instantiate interpretation-layer counterparts of the AIVC Predict--Explain--Discover agenda through three scientific reasoning tasks. We further introduce AIVC-Judge, a task-conditioned MLLM-as-a-judge framework with category-specific, reference-aware rubrics for evaluating open-ended responses. A complementary Model-Derived Hard-Negative Mining (MDHNM) strategy converts plausible errors observed during model inference into MCQ distractors for lower-cost evaluation. Within the evaluated heterogeneous model pool, MCQ accuracy correlates positively with AIVC-Judge scores, providing a complementary view of performance alongside open-response evaluation. Code and data demo are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/OmniVCBench.
ER  -