Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Full-data accuracy with fewer labels for training and fine-tuning machine-learning force fields

Abstract

Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) are reliable only near their training distribution, making efficient construction of diverse training sets a major bottleneck for both train-from-scratch and foundation fine-tuning workflows. Active learning can reduce this cost, but standard model-committee uncertainty is impractical for foundation MLFFs because each committee member requires a separate fine-tuning run. We present an active-learning workflow based on last-layer-projection regression (LLPR), a forward-pass-cheap per-configuration uncertainty estimator. Across molecular, condensed-phase, and electrolyte systems, LLPR identifies compact, high-value training sets that recover full-data accuracy using only a small fraction of electronic-structure labels. In foundation-model fine-tuning, LLPR-selected configurations approach the practical fine-tuning ceiling with substantially fewer labels than random selection. In iterative electrolyte fine-tuning, LLPR detects unphysical local coordination before new labelling, calibrates uncertainty in force-error units, and supports retrospective convergence monitoring. The resulting models reproduce reference density and Li--O coordination structure, providing a scalable uncertainty-quantification strategy across MLFF training regimes.

Related

  1. Accuracy, Reliability, and Efficiency of a MACE Machine-Learning Interatomic Potential for Aspirin: A Reproducible Benchmark for Molecular Simulation
    Modupe A. Omoniyi
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. Fine-tuning universal machine learning potentials for transition state search in surface catalysis
    Raffaele Cheula, Mie Andersen, John R. Kitchin
    npj Computational MaterialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text7 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  3. Data-Efficient Machine Learning Potentials for Organic Reactions through Active-Learning-Guided Fine-Tuning
    Kaipai Ren, Yujing Zhao, Kun Tang +3
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
  4. Targeted fine-tuning of machine-learning interatomic potentials for phonons and phase transitions.
    Jonas Grandel, Philipp Benner, Janine George
    Npj computational materialsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCPMC
  5. Training of Neural Network Machine Learning Potentials for Activation Barrier Calculations in Predicting Growth Modes of Deposited Metals
    Karl Rönnby, Cara-Lena Nies, Savannah May Timony +2
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{bi2026fulldata,
  title = {{Full-data accuracy with fewer labels for training and fine-tuning machine-learning force fields}},
  author = {Sheng Bi and Yi-Ze Wang and Jun Cheng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.14486},
  eprint = {2607.14486},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14486},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Full-data accuracy with fewer labels for training and fine-tuning machine-learning force fields
AU  - Sheng Bi
AU  - Yi-Ze Wang
AU  - Jun Cheng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.14486
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14486
AB  - Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) are reliable only near their training distribution, making efficient construction of diverse training sets a major bottleneck for both train-from-scratch and foundation fine-tuning workflows. Active learning can reduce this cost, but standard model-committee uncertainty is impractical for foundation MLFFs because each committee member requires a separate fine-tuning run. We present an active-learning workflow based on last-layer-projection regression (LLPR), a forward-pass-cheap per-configuration uncertainty estimator. Across molecular, condensed-phase, and electrolyte systems, LLPR identifies compact, high-value training sets that recover full-data accuracy using only a small fraction of electronic-structure labels. In foundation-model fine-tuning, LLPR-selected configurations approach the practical fine-tuning ceiling with substantially fewer labels than random selection. In iterative electrolyte fine-tuning, LLPR detects unphysical local coordination before new labelling, calibrates uncertainty in force-error units, and supports retrospective convergence monitoring. The resulting models reproduce reference density and Li--O coordination structure, providing a scalable uncertainty-quantification strategy across MLFF training regimes.
ER  -