Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

A novel force scaling method for ground reaction force estimation from pressure insoles to enable long-term remote monitoring

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
  2. 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
  3. 3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
  4. 4Department of Physical Therapy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America

Abstract

Background: Pressure-sensing insoles offer a portable way to quantify human movement biomechanics beyond the lab, enabling real-world monitoring. A common objective with these insoles is to estimate ground reaction forces (GRFs). However, force estimates from insoles typically exhibit a magnitude bias—underestimating or overestimating GRFs—that can vary across individuals and contexts. Conventional force scaling approaches can correct for this bias, but they rely on ground truth force plate data for calibration. This is often impractical for remote or longitudinal data collection, particularly for individuals with lower-limb injuries or disabilities. Objective: The purpose of this study was to introduce and evaluate a new force scaling method for pressure insoles to enable more accurate estimation of vertical GRFs without laboratory calibration or access to ground truth force plate data, and which could be applied to individuals with lower-limb injuries or disabilities. Methods: The new method combines epoch-based and physics-based approaches to perform periodic and dynamic force scaling based on a user’s body weight, in a way that is well-suited for use in real-world patient monitoring, and which does not require an individual to weight-bear on a single limb. This force scaling method was evaluated across different participants and activities representative of daily living and rehabilitation exercises. Results: Compared to nominal (unscaled) insole force estimates, the new scaling method reduced GRF errors by an average of 54–72%, achieving average errors on the order of 0.11–0.16 body weights. The new method worked reliably for different individuals, both limbs, and a variety of tasks and exercises. Conclusions: This method provides a practical, generalizable, and effective approach for improving vertical GRF estimation from pressure insoles during remote, longitudinal monitoring without in-lab calibration or force plates. This could improve GRF assessment outside clinical or laboratory settings and enable clinicians, researchers, and users to more accurately monitor musculoskeletal loading and other biomechanical metrics during rehabilitation, recovery, and physical activities in real-world environments.

Related

  1. Prenatal Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring and Detection of Chronic Hypertension
    O&G openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Association of 24 h Pulse Pressure Derived from Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Jing Yu, Rui Yang, Xi Xia +8
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Efficacy of tactile stimulation via vibratory ankle supports and insoles on proprioception and balance in functional ankle instability: an exploratory four-armed randomized trial
    Hanieh Khaliliyan, Mahmood Bahramizadeh, Ebrahim Sadeghi-demneh
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Intraoperative intra-aneurysmal pressure monitoring to individualize flow diverter therapy and optimize coil use in unruptured intracranial aneurysms
    Jianguo Zhong, Renhui Yi, Yu Jiang +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  5. Feasibility and acceptability of a remote blood pressure monitoring pharmacist-led telehealth programme in an emergency department transition care clinic: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Lama Ghazi, Paulina Gonzalez-Flores, Emily Green Vance +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zelik2026novel,
  title = {{A novel force scaling method for ground reaction force estimation from pressure insoles to enable long-term remote monitoring}},
  author = {Karl E. Zelik and Katherine M. Rodzak and Meredith K. Owen and Brian Noehren},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358957},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358957},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A novel force scaling method for ground reaction force estimation from pressure insoles to enable long-term remote monitoring
AU  - Karl E. Zelik
AU  - Katherine M. Rodzak
AU  - Meredith K. Owen
AU  - Brian Noehren
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358957
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358957
AB  - Background: Pressure-sensing insoles offer a portable way to quantify human movement biomechanics beyond the lab, enabling real-world monitoring. A common objective with these insoles is to estimate ground reaction forces (GRFs). However, force estimates from insoles typically exhibit a magnitude bias—underestimating or overestimating GRFs—that can vary across individuals and contexts. Conventional force scaling approaches can correct for this bias, but they rely on ground truth force plate data for calibration. This is often impractical for remote or longitudinal data collection, particularly for individuals with lower-limb injuries or disabilities. Objective: The purpose of this study was to introduce and evaluate a new force scaling method for pressure insoles to enable more accurate estimation of vertical GRFs without laboratory calibration or access to ground truth force plate data, and which could be applied to individuals with lower-limb injuries or disabilities. Methods: The new method combines epoch-based and physics-based approaches to perform periodic and dynamic force scaling based on a user’s body weight, in a way that is well-suited for use in real-world patient monitoring, and which does not require an individual to weight-bear on a single limb. This force scaling method was evaluated across different participants and activities representative of daily living and rehabilitation exercises. Results: Compared to nominal (unscaled) insole force estimates, the new scaling method reduced GRF errors by an average of 54–72%, achieving average errors on the order of 0.11–0.16 body weights. The new method worked reliably for different individuals, both limbs, and a variety of tasks and exercises. Conclusions: This method provides a practical, generalizable, and effective approach for improving vertical GRF estimation from pressure insoles during remote, longitudinal monitoring without in-lab calibration or force plates. This could improve GRF assessment outside clinical or laboratory settings and enable clinicians, researchers, and users to more accurately monitor musculoskeletal loading and other biomechanical metrics during rehabilitation, recovery, and physical activities in real-world environments.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -