Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Surgery

Safety analysis of the Weigao laparoscopic surgical robot for renal cyst decortication via transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches

  1. 1Xuzhou Clinical College, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
  2. 2Department of Urology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and conduct a safety analysis of the Chinese domestically produced Weigao Micro Hand laparoscopic surgical robot in renal cyst decortication via transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

Methods: Clinical data were collected from 63 patients with renal cysts who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery between May 2023 and July 2025. Among them, 31 patients were treated via the transperitoneal approach and 32 patients were treated via the retroperitoneal approach. Clinical characteristics, as well as surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes, were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results: Both the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approaches were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery or other unplanned interventions. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two approaches in terms of the operative time (66.13 ± 24.99 min vs. 77.50 ± 27.62 min) or postoperative hospital stay (3.87 ± 1.48 days vs. 4.56 ± 1.08 days). The retroperitoneal approach was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (15.68 ± 4.64 mL vs. 11.78 ± 3.80 mL, P < 0.05), whereas the transperitoneal approach was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative drainage duration (2.10 ± 0.98 days vs. 3.13 ± 1.62 days, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The application of the Weigao robotic surgical system in renal cyst decortication demonstrates favorable feasibility and safety. With respect to surgical approach selection, both techniques have their respective advantages and disadvantages. Given the continuity of laparoscopic experience, considerations for surgical safety, and the benefit of more refined manipulation afforded by the robotic system, the retroperitoneal approach currently appears to be the preferable option.

Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=223823, identifier ChiCTR2400081949.

Related

  1. Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Dismembered Pyeloplasty by Anderson-Hynes Procedure in Left Pelviureteric Junction Outlet Obstruction of a Horseshoe Kidney: A Case Report
    Aman Arora, Ishaan Shinde, Irshad A Khan +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  2. Giant primary retroperitoneal myxofibrosarcoma mimicking myxoid liposarcoma: a diagnostic and surgical challenge
    Journal of surgical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Comparing Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Myomectomy Versus Laparotomy at a Specialized Tertiary Hospital for Women’s Health: A Retrospective Study
    Hala A Bokhari, Maysoon Adham, Maha Alruwaythi +4
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Surgical management of cecal volvulus using endoscopic reduction as a bridge to elective laparoscopic surgery: a three-case series
    Kaita Suzuki, Koshiro Harata, Ryo Taguchi +9
    Journal of surgical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. Surgical Approaches to Perineal Reconstruction: A Narrative Review
    David A Febre-Alemañy, Michael J Franco
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{pan2026safety,
  title = {{Safety analysis of the Weigao laparoscopic surgical robot for renal cyst decortication via transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches}},
  author = {Run-Ze Pan and Hao Wang and Xin-Yu Liu and Xin-Lei Wang and Yu-Feng Sun and Bo Jiang and Zhi-Gang Li and Zhen-Duo Shi and Qing Liang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2026.1960246},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1960246},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Safety analysis of the Weigao laparoscopic surgical robot for renal cyst decortication via transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches
AU  - Run-Ze Pan
AU  - Hao Wang
AU  - Xin-Yu Liu
AU  - Xin-Lei Wang
AU  - Yu-Feng Sun
AU  - Bo Jiang
AU  - Zhi-Gang Li
AU  - Zhen-Duo Shi
AU  - Qing Liang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Frontiers in Surgery
DO  - 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1960246
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1960246
AB  - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and conduct a safety analysis of the Chinese domestically produced Weigao Micro Hand laparoscopic surgical robot in renal cyst decortication via transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.  Methods: Clinical data were collected from 63 patients with renal cysts who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery between May 2023 and July 2025. Among them, 31 patients were treated via the transperitoneal approach and 32 patients were treated via the retroperitoneal approach. Clinical characteristics, as well as surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes, were prospectively collected and analyzed.  Results: Both the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approaches were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery or other unplanned interventions. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two approaches in terms of the operative time (66.13 ± 24.99 min vs. 77.50 ± 27.62 min) or postoperative hospital stay (3.87 ± 1.48 days vs. 4.56 ± 1.08 days). The retroperitoneal approach was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (15.68 ± 4.64 mL vs. 11.78 ± 3.80 mL, P < 0.05), whereas the transperitoneal approach was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative drainage duration (2.10 ± 0.98 days vs. 3.13 ± 1.62 days, P < 0.05).  Conclusion: The application of the Weigao robotic surgical system in renal cyst decortication demonstrates favorable feasibility and safety. With respect to surgical approach selection, both techniques have their respective advantages and disadvantages. Given the continuity of laparoscopic experience, considerations for surgical safety, and the benefit of more refined manipulation afforded by the robotic system, the retroperitoneal approach currently appears to be the preferable option.  Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=223823, identifier ChiCTR2400081949.
SN  - 2296-875X
ER  -