Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Metabolites

Metabolomics in Early-Phase Clinical Trials from 2010 to 2025

  1. 1William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
  2. 2Department of HIV Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH, UK
  3. 3Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Metabolomics has the potential to enhance the definition of medication response phenotypes in early-phase clinical trials, yet global uptake and distribution are not well characterised. This study provides an international assessment of metabolomics integration in registered early-phase clinical trials. Methods: Data were obtained from the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Early-phase trials (phase 0–II) conducted from 2010 to 2025 were analysed, and metabolomics studies were identified using predefined keyword searches across trial records. Results: A total of 183,041 early-phase trials were identified, of which 640 (0.35%) incorporated metabolomics. Uptake has increased modestly over time but remains low overall and is concentrated predominantly in high-income countries. The United Kingdom demonstrated the highest proportional integration (1.3%), while the People’s Republic of China (n = 237) and the United States of America (n = 90) contributed the greatest absolute number of trials with metabolomics. Among the included metabolomic studies: 187 (29.2%) were phase 0, 229 (35.8%) were phase I trials, 183 (28.6%) were phase II, and 41 (6.4%) were combined phase I/II studies. Metabolomics was most commonly included as a secondary, rather than primary outcome (49.7% vs. 25.3%). Conclusions: Metabolomics remains underutilised in early-phase clinical trials. Addressing barriers to implementation will be critical to enable broader integration of metabolomics into early-phase clinical trials and to integrate a multi-omic approach to precision medicine.

Related

  1. Metabolomics in the Prediction and Early Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Advances and Applications.
    Xiaokai Wei, Min He, Haili Wang +9
    International journal of medical sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  2. Baseline-referenced plasma metabolomic trajectories during early post-exercise recovery: A secondary analysis of public human exercise metabolomics data
    Yuanzhang Feng, Zhenwei Wu
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnzymology & metabolismProteomics & metabolomicsPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  3. When Clinical and Metabolomics Data Work Together: A Comparative Framework for Multimodal Disease Classification across Machine and Deep Learning.
    Kwanjeera Wanichthanarak, Kassaporn Duangkumpha, Nichapa Kleebkomut +5
    ACS measurement science auPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  4. Translating Translation: Lessons from Zotatifin's Clinical Development and the Case for Trials in Lymphoma.
    Paola Manara, Jonathan H Schatz
    Current oncology reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCPMC
  5. Primate embryoids: an in vitro model leading from a totipotency-like phase to early organogenesis.
    Aseem Tara, Wilfried A Kues
    Signal transduction and targeted therapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{thompson2026metabolomics,
  title = {{Metabolomics in Early-Phase Clinical Trials from 2010 to 2025}},
  author = {Jack T. Thompson and Maia Megase and Marta Boffito and Mark J. Caulfield and Emma F. Magavern},
  journal = {Metabolites},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/metabo16100777},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/16/10/777},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Metabolomics in Early-Phase Clinical Trials from 2010 to 2025
AU  - Jack T. Thompson
AU  - Maia Megase
AU  - Marta Boffito
AU  - Mark J. Caulfield
AU  - Emma F. Magavern
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Metabolites
DO  - 10.3390/metabo16100777
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/16/10/777
AB  - Background/Objectives: Metabolomics has the potential to enhance the definition of medication response phenotypes in early-phase clinical trials, yet global uptake and distribution are not well characterised. This study provides an international assessment of metabolomics integration in registered early-phase clinical trials. Methods: Data were obtained from the World Health Organization’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Early-phase trials (phase 0–II) conducted from 2010 to 2025 were analysed, and metabolomics studies were identified using predefined keyword searches across trial records. Results: A total of 183,041 early-phase trials were identified, of which 640 (0.35%) incorporated metabolomics. Uptake has increased modestly over time but remains low overall and is concentrated predominantly in high-income countries. The United Kingdom demonstrated the highest proportional integration (1.3%), while the People’s Republic of China (n = 237) and the United States of America (n = 90) contributed the greatest absolute number of trials with metabolomics. Among the included metabolomic studies: 187 (29.2%) were phase 0, 229 (35.8%) were phase I trials, 183 (28.6%) were phase II, and 41 (6.4%) were combined phase I/II studies. Metabolomics was most commonly included as a secondary, rather than primary outcome (49.7% vs. 25.3%). Conclusions: Metabolomics remains underutilised in early-phase clinical trials. Addressing barriers to implementation will be critical to enable broader integration of metabolomics into early-phase clinical trials and to integrate a multi-omic approach to precision medicine.
SN  - 2218-1989
ER  -