PreprintarXiv licencearXiv
Order closure, order adherence and Fatou norms
Abstract
We record two results in the theory of vector and Banach lattices related to order adherence. First, we give a negative answer to Gao and Leung's question on whether the uo-adherence of sublattices must be order closed. Second, we present a self-contained counterexample showing that a Banach lattice with a weakly Fatou norm need not admit any equivalent lattice norm with the Fatou property.
Related
- The monodromy conjecture for high order poles, and norms of residue antiderivatives
- Mamba-Assisted Non-Markovian Closure for Reduced-Order Modeling
- Postcritically finite endomorphisms II: Fatou sets
- Examples of Uniformly Quasiregular Mappings with Fatou Set Having Infinitely Many Components
- An Exactly Solvable Ekman Layer with a Fractional-Order Stress Closure
BibTeX
@misc{aviles2026order,
title = {{Order closure, order adherence and Fatou norms}},
author = {A. Avilés and M. A. Taylor and P. Tradacete},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.06689},
eprint = {2609.06689},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06689},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Order closure, order adherence and Fatou norms
AU - A. Avilés
AU - M. A. Taylor
AU - P. Tradacete
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/06
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.06689
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06689
AB - We record two results in the theory of vector and Banach lattices related to order adherence. First, we give a negative answer to Gao and Leung's question on whether the uo-adherence of sublattices must be order closed. Second, we present a self-contained counterexample showing that a Banach lattice with a weakly Fatou norm need not admit any equivalent lattice norm with the Fatou property.
ER -