Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Physics-informed Neural Networks Based on the Fokker-Planck Model for Rarefied Gas Flows

Abstract

Rarefied nonequilibrium flows are described by the Boltzmann equation, which can be solved using stochastic particle or deterministic methods. With advances in computing, data-assisted physics-informed neural networks have been widely used for flow prediction by combining governing equations with measured or computed data. Data-free PINNs do not require such training data and have been widely studied for continuum flows, but their application to rarefied flows remains limited. This study develops a data-free Fokker-Planck physics-informed neural network (FP-PINN) to describe rarefied nonequilibrium flows. The physics loss is constructed from the ellipsoidal statistical Fokker-Planck (ES-FP) equation using a velocity distribution function (VDF) closure and moment projection. The FP-PINN is evaluated for a steady one-dimensional Mach 10 normal shock. The FP-PINN results agree with the numerical ES-FP results, with errors below 1%. Compared with the particle ES-FP results, the FP-PINN predicts a sharper shock structure with errors up to 17%. This difference is attributed to the VDF closure and moment projection.

Related

  1. Physics-informed neural networks for soliton solutions and parameter identification of the two-mode Korteweg–de Vries equation
    Mohammad Akram, Umar Ishtiaq, Ioan-Lucian Popa
    Nuclear Physics BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Statistical & nonlinear physicsCrossref
  2. Lecture notes on Physics Informed Neural Networks, Neural Operators, and their applications
    Alessandro Bombini
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textComputational physicsarXiv
  3. Lazy training of quantum physics informed neural networks
    Anderson Melchor Hernandez, Giacomo De Palma
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  4. Towards Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Stiff Guitar String Vibrations
    Xinmeng Luan, Kensuke Okada, Ryoya Tabata +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
  5. Addressing the ground state of the deuteron by physics-informed neural networks
    Lorenzo Brevi, Antonio Mandarino, Carlo Barbieri +1
    Physics Letters BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedNuclear physicsCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026physicsinformed,
  title = {{Physics-informed Neural Networks Based on the Fokker-Planck Model for Rarefied Gas Flows}},
  author = {Joonbeom Kim and Eunji Jun},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.22390},
  eprint = {2610.22390},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22390},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Physics-informed Neural Networks Based on the Fokker-Planck Model for Rarefied Gas Flows
AU  - Joonbeom Kim
AU  - Eunji Jun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.22390
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22390
AB  - Rarefied nonequilibrium flows are described by the Boltzmann equation, which can be solved using stochastic particle or deterministic methods. With advances in computing, data-assisted physics-informed neural networks have been widely used for flow prediction by combining governing equations with measured or computed data. Data-free PINNs do not require such training data and have been widely studied for continuum flows, but their application to rarefied flows remains limited. This study develops a data-free Fokker-Planck physics-informed neural network (FP-PINN) to describe rarefied nonequilibrium flows. The physics loss is constructed from the ellipsoidal statistical Fokker-Planck (ES-FP) equation using a velocity distribution function (VDF) closure and moment projection. The FP-PINN is evaluated for a steady one-dimensional Mach 10 normal shock. The FP-PINN results agree with the numerical ES-FP results, with errors below 1%. Compared with the particle ES-FP results, the FP-PINN predicts a sharper shock structure with errors up to 17%. This difference is attributed to the VDF closure and moment projection.
ER  -