Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

When Weak Submodularity Meets Matroids: How Does Standard Greedy Behave?

Abstract

Weakly submodular maximization finds numerous applications in machine learning, data mining and statistics. In particular, under a cardinality constraint, the standard greedy algorithm is known to attain the tight (1−e−γ)-approximation guarantee, where γ denotes the submodularity ratio. However, when considering general matroid constraints, \emph{how well standard greedy can perform} has remained a longstanding open question. In this paper, we resolve this question by studying the worst-case approximation guarantee Rgr(γ,r) of standard forward greedy, where r is the rank of matroid. Specifically, our first contribution is the following refined lower bound Rgr(γ,r)≥ max{ γ/r, γ2/(Bγ+√(γ(r−1))), (γr+1)/(2−γ+γr+1), γ2/(14(Bγ+√(γ(1−γ)(r−1)))) }, where Bγtriangleq2−γ+γ2. This lower bound not only strictly improves upon the previous guarantee of 0.4γ2/(1+√(γr)), but also can recover the classical 1/2-approximation guarantee at γ=1. Subsequently, a corresponding upper bound is established for Rgr(γ,r), namely, labelequpperabstract Rgr(γ,r) ≤min{1/2,20max{γ/r, γ2/(Bγ+ √(γ(1−γ)(r−1)))}}. For every fixed γ∈(0,1), this equation effectively sharpens the recent Oγ(1/log(n−1)) upper bound to Oγ(r−1/2), where n is the size of ground set. Putting all these results together, we eventually can obtain Rgr(γ,r) = Θ( max{γ/r, γ2/(1+√(γ(1−γ)r))} ).

Related

  1. Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids
    Shi Fu, Youming Qiao, Dacheng Tao +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Submodularity of entropy under quantum convolution
    Milad M. Goodarzi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Tensor Product Does Not Behave Additively on Delooping Level
    Ryan Lam
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Discounted Hitting Domination on Graphs with Submodularity, Complexity and Exact Algorithms
    Julian D. Allagan, Kevin Pereyra, William A. Massey
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. On the Log-submodularity for zonoids: from Mixed Volume inequalities to the Hypercube
    Gennadiy Averkov, Katherina von Dichter, Ivan Soprunov
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhang2026when,
  title = {{When Weak Submodularity Meets Matroids: How Does Standard Greedy Behave?}},
  author = {Qixin Zhang and Shi Fu and Shengminjie Chen and Chao Qian and Dacheng Tao},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.26967},
  eprint = {2610.26967},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26967},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When Weak Submodularity Meets Matroids: How Does Standard Greedy Behave?
AU  - Qixin Zhang
AU  - Shi Fu
AU  - Shengminjie Chen
AU  - Chao Qian
AU  - Dacheng Tao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.26967
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26967
AB  - Weakly submodular maximization finds numerous applications in machine learning, data mining and statistics. In particular, under a cardinality constraint, the standard greedy algorithm is known to attain the tight (1−e^−γ)-approximation guarantee, where γ denotes the submodularity ratio. However, when considering general matroid constraints, \emph{how well standard greedy can perform} has remained a longstanding open question. In this paper, we resolve this question by studying the worst-case approximation guarantee R_gr(γ,r) of standard forward greedy, where r is the rank of matroid. Specifically, our first contribution is the following refined lower bound R_gr(γ,r)≥ max{ γ/r, γ^2/(B_γ+√(γ(r−1))), (γ^r+1)/(2−γ+γ^r+1), γ^2/(14(B_γ+√(γ(1−γ)(r−1)))) }, where B_γtriangleq2−γ+γ^2. This lower bound not only strictly improves upon the previous guarantee of 0.4γ^2/(1+√(γr)), but also can recover the classical 1/2-approximation guarantee at γ=1. Subsequently, a corresponding upper bound is established for R_gr(γ,r), namely, labeleq_upper_abstract R_gr(γ,r) ≤min{1/2,20max{γ/r, γ^2/(B_γ+ √(γ(1−γ)(r−1)))}}. For every fixed γ∈(0,1), this equation effectively sharpens the recent O_γ(1/log(n−1)) upper bound to O_γ(r^−1/2), where n is the size of ground set. Putting all these results together, we eventually can obtain R_gr(γ,r) = Θ( max{γ/r, γ^2/(1+√(γ(1−γ)r))} ).
ER  -