Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Symmetry-resolved periods in a cyclic-dominance automaton: separating intrinsic from lattice-induced periodicity

Abstract

Periodic attractors of spatially extended systems possess not one period but a hierarchy of periods, one for each level of observation and symmetry quotient, and this hierarchy separates how a pattern evolves from how it fits the finite domain. For a synchronous threshold model of cyclic dominance on an L× L torus, equivalent to the three-color cyclic cellular automaton of Fisch, Gravner and Griffeath, we measure for every attractor a \emph{tuple} of periods: that of the populations (Tpop), of the full configuration (Tst), and of the configuration up to color rotations (Tcol), lattice symmetries (Tgeo) and the full space--color group (TG). Equivariance implies exact divisibility relations and the factorization Tst=TG m, where m counts the applications of the symmetry h that maps the configuration onto itself after TG steps: TG and the type of h belong to the pattern, m to the lattice, and the attractors are relative periodic orbits whose full period emerges from the interaction between the intrinsic dynamics and the lattice symmetries. A family of attractors built around a pair of counter-rotating spirals, with Tpop=24 and TG=8, persists from L=9 to L=40 while Tst takes values from 24 to 960, given in every case by the order of h; on a rectangular 9×12 torus it takes the value 48, absent from all square tori. With more than 4.5×105 runs at each of L=8 and L=9 we estimate the basins of attraction: fixed points take 95--97\% of the configuration space, and no single period is enough to tell the oscillating attractors apart. The same analysis locates local diversity: it is balanced whenever the cycle has a color symmetry and, on large lattices, it is concentrated at the spiral cores.

Related

  1. Reconstructability of Inverse Problems under Symmetry: Separating Structural, Effective, and Physical Upper Bounds
    Isshin Arai
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsarXiv
  2. Intrinsic mirror symmetry for orbifold cubic surfaces and the A1 spherical DAHA
    Pierrick Bousseau, Sayan Chattopadhyay
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
  3. On intrinsic homological mirror symmetry for toric degenerations
    Shaoyun Bai, Sebastian Haney
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Symmetry without a manifold: intrinsic dimension on orbits
    Chon-Fai Kam, Miloud Bessafi, Frédéric Cadet
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. The smallest Mealy automaton of intermediate growth
    Laurent Bartholdi, Illya I. Reznykov, Vitaly I. Sushchansky
    Journal of AlgebraPeer-reviewedLicence not stated30 citedAlgebra & number theoryHAL
BibTeX
@misc{munoz2026symmetryresolved,
  title = {{Symmetry-resolved periods in a cyclic-dominance automaton: separating intrinsic from lattice-induced periodicity}},
  author = {Francisco J. Muñoz and Juan Carlos Nuño},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.37990},
  eprint = {2610.37990},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37990},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Symmetry-resolved periods in a cyclic-dominance automaton: separating intrinsic from lattice-induced periodicity
AU  - Francisco J. Muñoz
AU  - Juan Carlos Nuño
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.37990
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37990
AB  - Periodic attractors of spatially extended systems possess not one period but a hierarchy of periods, one for each level of observation and symmetry quotient, and this hierarchy separates how a pattern evolves from how it fits the finite domain. For a synchronous threshold model of cyclic dominance on an L× L torus, equivalent to the three-color cyclic cellular automaton of Fisch, Gravner and Griffeath, we measure for every attractor a \emph{tuple} of periods: that of the populations (Tpop), of the full configuration (Tst), and of the configuration up to color rotations (Tcol), lattice symmetries (Tgeo) and the full space--color group (TG). Equivariance implies exact divisibility relations and the factorization Tst=TG m, where m counts the applications of the symmetry h that maps the configuration onto itself after TG steps: TG and the type of h belong to the pattern, m to the lattice, and the attractors are relative periodic orbits whose full period emerges from the interaction between the intrinsic dynamics and the lattice symmetries. A family of attractors built around a pair of counter-rotating spirals, with Tpop=24 and TG=8, persists from L=9 to L=40 while Tst takes values from 24 to 960, given in every case by the order of h; on a rectangular 9×12 torus it takes the value 48, absent from all square tori. With more than 4.5×10^5 runs at each of L=8 and L=9 we estimate the basins of attraction: fixed points take 95--97\% of the configuration space, and no single period is enough to tell the oscillating attractors apart. The same analysis locates local diversity: it is balanced whenever the cycle has a color symmetry and, on large lattices, it is concentrated at the spiral cores.
ER  -