Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Statistical Gains from Looped Estimation under Parameter Budgets

Abstract

Memory constraints in artificial intelligence motivate accurate function approximation with fewer parameters. We study looping, which repeatedly composes one update function with shared parameters; each output becomes the next input. A looped Transformer, for example, reuses one block, whereas its conventional untied counterpart uses separately parameterized blocks. We compare their parameter requirements for a given worst-case approximation accuracy, or equivalently, their approximation accuracy under a common budget limiting distinct trainable coefficients. We then ask whether this representational parsimony improves statistical accuracy. For general likelihood models, we establish an upper squared Hellinger risk bound for looped sieve maximum likelihood and a minimax lower bound for the jointly tuned untied family. Further loop iterations improve the approximation bound without adding parameters, while increasing computation and the fitted-class complexity bound. For targets of known Hölder smoothness, looped residual feedforward networks and post-layer-normalized Transformers attain the minimax polynomial rate up to logarithmic factors with a fixed number of bounded real parameters. At sufficiently large fixed budgets, looped worst-case risk vanishes while optimal worst-case untied risk remains bounded away from zero. The loop-to-untied risk ratio also tends to zero under specified growing-budget conditions. Regression, binary response, and energy-based generative models illustrate the theory.

Related

  1. Uniform Statistical Convergence of Empirical Sinkhorn Potentials with Exponential and Polynomial Dependence on the Regularization Parameter
    Denis Belomestny
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  2. Estimation with Quantized Parameter Side-Information
    Mathis Wetterwald, Ofer Shayevitz, Michèle Wigger
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Asymptotic approximation of sensitivities in finite dimensional continuous data assimilation with application to parameter estimation
    Joshua Newey, Jared P. Whitehead
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsMathematical physicsarXiv
  4. Exact temporal variations and parameter estimation for space--time fractional stochastic heat equations driven by multiplicative noise
    Yongkang Li, Yaozhong Hu, Litan Yan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  5. A statistical theory for blind denoising: minimax estimation of the noise level from a single sample
    Zhuoer Shen
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tian2026statistical,
  title = {{Statistical Gains from Looped Estimation under Parameter Budgets}},
  author = {Xinyu Tian and Xiaotong Shen},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25778},
  eprint = {2609.25778},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25778},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Statistical Gains from Looped Estimation under Parameter Budgets
AU  - Xinyu Tian
AU  - Xiaotong Shen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25778
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25778
AB  - Memory constraints in artificial intelligence motivate accurate function approximation with fewer parameters. We study looping, which repeatedly composes one update function with shared parameters; each output becomes the next input. A looped Transformer, for example, reuses one block, whereas its conventional untied counterpart uses separately parameterized blocks. We compare their parameter requirements for a given worst-case approximation accuracy, or equivalently, their approximation accuracy under a common budget limiting distinct trainable coefficients. We then ask whether this representational parsimony improves statistical accuracy. For general likelihood models, we establish an upper squared Hellinger risk bound for looped sieve maximum likelihood and a minimax lower bound for the jointly tuned untied family. Further loop iterations improve the approximation bound without adding parameters, while increasing computation and the fitted-class complexity bound. For targets of known Hölder smoothness, looped residual feedforward networks and post-layer-normalized Transformers attain the minimax polynomial rate up to logarithmic factors with a fixed number of bounded real parameters. At sufficiently large fixed budgets, looped worst-case risk vanishes while optimal worst-case untied risk remains bounded away from zero. The loop-to-untied risk ratio also tends to zero under specified growing-budget conditions. Regression, binary response, and energy-based generative models illustrate the theory.
ER  -