The Missing Black Hole in the Large Magellanic Cloud: A Dynamical Prediction for Its Present-day Location
4 affiliations
- 1University of Wisconsin
- 2McDonald Observatory
- 3AURA for ESA
- 4Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
Abstract
There are indications that the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) hosts a central supermassive black hole (SMBH), yet no direct detection exists: one reason is that its present-day location need not necessarily coincide with the photometric or kinematic centers. Here we frame a dynamical targeting problem and predict the present-day sky location of the LMC SMBH. We model the recent LMC–Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) interaction, which induces a bar-disk offset, and integrate SMBH orbits within a realistic, time-dependent LMC–SMC–Milky Way (MW) potential. We show that the MW tidal field at the present epoch exceeds that of the SMC by at least an order of magnitude, setting a preferred direction for coherent, vertical low-amplitude displacements, while the disk asymmetry drives in-plane offsets. Projecting onto the observed LMC frame, the mean of our predicted SMBH probability distribution is located at ( α , δ ) = ( 80 . ″ 23 , − 69 . ″ 55 ) g, with a 1 σ confidence ellipse having semimajor and semiminor axes of ( a , b ) = ( 1 . ″ 34 , 0 . ″ 56 ) , respectively. This mean is ∼6′ north of the adopted dynamical center, while the mode coincides with the dynamical center and lies well within the 1 σ confidence region. Furthermore, all literature estimates of the LMC center considered here fall within the 2 σ confidence region. This provides a concrete, testable target for ongoing and upcoming spectroscopic surveys, transforming the search for the LMC SMBH from an unconstrained problem into a focused observational strategy.
Related
- The XMM-Newton view of the DEM L36 superbubble in the Large Magellanic Cloud
- Light curve spectral energy distribution fitting of 13 carbon-rich Mira variable stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud
- The dearth of dustless HdC stars in the Magellanic Clouds: A metallicity-driven white dwarf merger mass effect
- Same Events, Weaker Bound: Model Dependence in Magellanic Microlensing Limits on Primordial Black Holes
- The MeerKAT 1.3 GHz survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud: Point Source Catalogue
BibTeX
@article{chisholm2026missing,
title = {{The Missing Black Hole in the Large Magellanic Cloud: A Dynamical Prediction for Its Present-day Location}},
author = {Robin Chisholm and Elena D’Onghia and Niv Drory and Andrew J. Fox and Noam Libeskind},
journal = {The Astrophysical Journal},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3847/1538-4357/aeacce},
url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aeacce},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The Missing Black Hole in the Large Magellanic Cloud: A Dynamical Prediction for Its Present-day Location
AU - Robin Chisholm
AU - Elena D’Onghia
AU - Niv Drory
AU - Andrew J. Fox
AU - Noam Libeskind
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - The Astrophysical Journal
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aeacce
UR - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aeacce
AB - There are indications that the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) hosts a central supermassive black hole (SMBH), yet no direct detection exists: one reason is that its present-day location need not necessarily coincide with the photometric or kinematic centers. Here we frame a dynamical targeting problem and predict the present-day sky location of the LMC SMBH. We model the recent LMC–Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) interaction, which induces a bar-disk offset, and integrate SMBH orbits within a realistic, time-dependent LMC–SMC–Milky Way (MW) potential. We show that the MW tidal field at the present epoch exceeds that of the SMC by at least an order of magnitude, setting a preferred direction for coherent, vertical low-amplitude displacements, while the disk asymmetry drives in-plane offsets. Projecting onto the observed LMC frame, the mean of our predicted SMBH probability distribution is located at ( α , δ ) = ( 80 . ″ 23 , − 69 . ″ 55 ) g, with a 1 σ confidence ellipse having semimajor and semiminor axes of ( a , b ) = ( 1 . ″ 34 , 0 . ″ 56 ) , respectively. This mean is ∼6′ north of the adopted dynamical center, while the mode coincides with the dynamical center and lies well within the 1 σ confidence region. Furthermore, all literature estimates of the LMC center considered here fall within the 2 σ confidence region. This provides a concrete, testable target for ongoing and upcoming spectroscopic surveys, transforming the search for the LMC SMBH from an unconstrained problem into a focused observational strategy.
SN - 1538-4357
SN - 0004-637X
ER -