Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

Health economic evaluation of polytrauma treatment in the current aG-DRG system - Results of a Level I Trauma Center.

  1. 1Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. [email protected].
  2. 2Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Abstract

Purpose

Resource-intensive polytrauma care is associated with high treatment and readiness costs and poses a financial challenge for hospitals. The aim of this retrospective single-center study of the years 2020 to 2022 was to analyze polytrauma reimbursements and costs.Methods

Based on billing and clinical data of 201 polytrauma cases from a German University Hospital and Level I Trauma Center, revenues and costs of the eleven MDC 21 A polytrauma DRGs were analyzed. Ratios of the revenue in relation to LOS, ventilation hours, OR time and implant costs as well as personnel costs were calculated. Contribution margins were determined as an upper-bound estimate.Results

DRG reimbursement was highest for the most severely injured patients (50,852 €, DRG W36Z). It was lowest for patients who died within five days (2,214 €, DRG W60Z) or without surgeries (4,056 €, DRG W61B). The contribution margin was also highest for the most severely injured patients (52,775 €, DRG W36Z). Revenues in relation to ICU LOS (3,455 €/day, DRG W36Z) and ventilation time (238 €/hour, DRG W01B) were lowest for the most severe polytraumas. Regarding OR time and implant costs, reimbursement was lowest for injuries of the spine, pelvis and extremities with 62 €/min (DRG W02B) and 5 €/€ (DRG W02A).Conclusion

Treatment of polytrauma patients with long ICU stay, extended mechanical ventilation and multiple injuries of the extremities, pelvis and spine is not adequately reflected by the current per-case reimbursement in relation to the resources used (ICU days, ventilation hours, OR time and implant costs).

Related

  1. Medico-Economic and Medico-Social Evaluation of Two Types of Treatment for Clubfoot in France: A Prospective Study Using a Mixed Methods Approach.
    Anaïs Le Jeannic, Belkacem Zenati, Clément Picot-Ngo +9
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Advancing women's health in Egypt: an economic evaluation of the presidential initiative for nationwide breast cancer early detection and treatment.
    Khaled Abdelghaffar, Mohamed Hassany, Hesham Elghazaly +16
    Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publiquePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Exercise and the Kynurenine pathway: Current state of knowledge and results from a randomized cross-over study comparing acute effects of endurance and resistance training
    Niklas Joisten, Felix Kummerhoff, Christina Koliamitra +9
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated80 citedPsychiatry & mental healthOpenAlex
  4. Current Estimates of the Economic Burden of Hearing Loss in India: A Societal Cost-of-Illness Study
    S. Mannava, V. Ramkumar, G. Murthy
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. The economic burden of myopia diagnosis and treatment : A cross-sectional cost-of-illness study in Yantai, China
    Yuelin Sun, Xiaosong Cheng, Cong Sun +5
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hierl2026health,
  title = {{Health economic evaluation of polytrauma treatment in the current aG-DRG system - Results of a Level I Trauma Center.}},
  author = {Katja Hierl and Claudius Thiedemann and Maximilian Kerschbaum and Daniel Popp and Volker Alt},
  journal = {European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s00068-026-03368-1},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909495},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Health economic evaluation of polytrauma treatment in the current aG-DRG system - Results of a Level I Trauma Center.
AU  - Katja Hierl
AU  - Claudius Thiedemann
AU  - Maximilian Kerschbaum
AU  - Daniel Popp
AU  - Volker Alt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
DO  - 10.1007/s00068-026-03368-1
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42909495
AB  - Purpose  Resource-intensive polytrauma care is associated with high treatment and readiness costs and poses a financial challenge for hospitals. The aim of this retrospective single-center study of the years 2020 to 2022 was to analyze polytrauma reimbursements and costs.Methods  Based on billing and clinical data of 201 polytrauma cases from a German University Hospital and Level I Trauma Center, revenues and costs of the eleven MDC 21 A polytrauma DRGs were analyzed. Ratios of the revenue in relation to LOS, ventilation hours, OR time and implant costs as well as personnel costs were calculated. Contribution margins were determined as an upper-bound estimate.Results  DRG reimbursement was highest for the most severely injured patients (50,852 €, DRG W36Z). It was lowest for patients who died within five days (2,214 €, DRG W60Z) or without surgeries (4,056 €, DRG W61B). The contribution margin was also highest for the most severely injured patients (52,775 €, DRG W36Z). Revenues in relation to ICU LOS (3,455 €/day, DRG W36Z) and ventilation time (238 €/hour, DRG W01B) were lowest for the most severe polytraumas. Regarding OR time and implant costs, reimbursement was lowest for injuries of the spine, pelvis and extremities with 62 €/min (DRG W02B) and 5 €/€ (DRG W02A).Conclusion  Treatment of polytrauma patients with long ICU stay, extended mechanical ventilation and multiple injuries of the extremities, pelvis and spine is not adequately reflected by the current per-case reimbursement in relation to the resources used (ICU days, ventilation hours, OR time and implant costs).
SN  - 1863-9933
SN  - 1863-9941
ER  -