Family experiences with genetic/genomic testing in the pediatric intensive care unit
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
- 2BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
- 3Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
- 4Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
- 5Ethics Service, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
Abstract
Genetic testing is increasingly utilized in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICUs and PICUs, respectively) for diagnosis and management. Despite this, research on family experiences and genetic testing is limited, especially in the PICU. Our previous NICU study emphasized the importance of communication in conveying test results. Similar to the NICU, PICU settings raise parental stress and uncertainty. We aimed to identify considerations to increase empowerment for parents undergoing genetic testing in the PICU and compare our results to previous NICU findings. The following mixed-methods study, conducted at BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, included a demographic and validated empowerment survey (EMPATHIC-38) and semi-structured interviews with caregivers of children who underwent genetic testing in the PICU. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interviews were analyzed using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis. Transcripts were coded by two independent coders, and themes were finalized. Eleven semi-structured interviews and 12 empowerment surveys were completed. The organization (Mean = 5.79/6.00 ± 0.16) and professional attitude (Mean = 5.77/6.00 ± 0.17) domains scored the highest. The lowest-scoring domain was parental participation (Mean = 5.43/6.00 ± 0.15), measuring healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward parental engagement in care. Identified themes included: preferences for different formats for receiving results, considerations for different languages, understandable language, impact on extended family members, funding for testing, and long-term clinical management.
Conclusion: In contrast to the NICU, PICU parents showed greater consideration for extended family members and long-term management, with a clear preference for educational materials. Parents in both ICUs identified the need for a clear explanation of uninformative and positive results. What is Known:
• Despite the growing implementation of genetic testing for critically ill children, the evaluation of caregivers’ experiences for those undergoing this process is limited, particularly in the PICU.
• Factors affecting parental empowerment for caregivers in the PICU environment are critical to tailor family-centred care.
What is New:
• PICU-specific considerations for navigating challenges between healthcare professionals and families were identified, which are in contrast to previous findings in the NICU.
• To increase caregivers’ empowerment, both genetic and nongenetic healthcare professionals should work together with caregivers to navigate various aspects of genetic testing, including funding, timeline, potential diagnoses, long-term clinical management, and implications for extended family members.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-07564-4.
Related
- Multi-Locus Molecular Findings in Pediatric-Onset Inherited Metabolic Disorders: An Eight-Year Series of Outsourced Genomic Testing in Taiwan
- From Fragmentation to Standardization: A Systematic Review Update and Critical Appraisal of Genetic and Genomic Testing Assessment Frameworks and Their Alignment With the HTA Core Model.
- Physiotherapists’ knowledge and experiences of palliative care in neonatal intensive care units: a qualitative study Conhecimentos e vivência de fisioterapeutas sobre cuidados paliativos em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal: um estudo qualitativo
- OP–052 Compassion fatigue in pediatric intensive care nurses providing end-of-life care
- Rapid whole-genome sequencing in the pediatric intensive care unit: from etiologic diagnosis to precision management—a narrative review
BibTeX
@article{kim2026family,
title = {{Family experiences with genetic/genomic testing in the pediatric intensive care unit}},
author = {Sunu Kim and Srinivas Murthy and Sylvie Langlois and Alice Virani and Horacio Osiovich and Jehannine Austin and Jehannine Austin and Bartha Knoppers and Larry D. Lynd and Shelin Adam and Nick Bansback and Patricia Birch and Lorne Clark and Nick Dragojlovic and Jan Friedman and Debby Lambert and Darly Pullman and Wyeth Wasserman and Ma’n Zawati and Alison M. Elliott},
journal = {European Journal of Pediatrics},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1007/s00431-026-07564-4},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-07564-4},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Family experiences with genetic/genomic testing in the pediatric intensive care unit
AU - Sunu Kim
AU - Srinivas Murthy
AU - Sylvie Langlois
AU - Alice Virani
AU - Horacio Osiovich
AU - Jehannine Austin
AU - Jehannine Austin
AU - Bartha Knoppers
AU - Larry D. Lynd
AU - Shelin Adam
AU - Nick Bansback
AU - Patricia Birch
AU - Lorne Clark
AU - Nick Dragojlovic
AU - Jan Friedman
AU - Debby Lambert
AU - Darly Pullman
AU - Wyeth Wasserman
AU - Ma’n Zawati
AU - Alison M. Elliott
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/09
JO - European Journal of Pediatrics
DO - 10.1007/s00431-026-07564-4
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-07564-4
AB - Genetic testing is increasingly utilized in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units (NICUs and PICUs, respectively) for diagnosis and management. Despite this, research on family experiences and genetic testing is limited, especially in the PICU. Our previous NICU study emphasized the importance of communication in conveying test results. Similar to the NICU, PICU settings raise parental stress and uncertainty. We aimed to identify considerations to increase empowerment for parents undergoing genetic testing in the PICU and compare our results to previous NICU findings. The following mixed-methods study, conducted at BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, included a demographic and validated empowerment survey (EMPATHIC-38) and semi-structured interviews with caregivers of children who underwent genetic testing in the PICU. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interviews were analyzed using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis. Transcripts were coded by two independent coders, and themes were finalized. Eleven semi-structured interviews and 12 empowerment surveys were completed. The organization (Mean = 5.79/6.00 ± 0.16) and professional attitude (Mean = 5.77/6.00 ± 0.17) domains scored the highest. The lowest-scoring domain was parental participation (Mean = 5.43/6.00 ± 0.15), measuring healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward parental engagement in care. Identified themes included: preferences for different formats for receiving results, considerations for different languages, understandable language, impact on extended family members, funding for testing, and long-term clinical management. Conclusion: In contrast to the NICU, PICU parents showed greater consideration for extended family members and long-term management, with a clear preference for educational materials. Parents in both ICUs identified the need for a clear explanation of uninformative and positive results. What is Known: • Despite the growing implementation of genetic testing for critically ill children, the evaluation of caregivers’ experiences for those undergoing this process is limited, particularly in the PICU. • Factors affecting parental empowerment for caregivers in the PICU environment are critical to tailor family-centred care. What is New: • PICU-specific considerations for navigating challenges between healthcare professionals and families were identified, which are in contrast to previous findings in the NICU. • To increase caregivers’ empowerment, both genetic and nongenetic healthcare professionals should work together with caregivers to navigate various aspects of genetic testing, including funding, timeline, potential diagnoses, long-term clinical management, and implications for extended family members. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-026-07564-4.
SN - 0340-6199
SN - 1432-1076
ER -