Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Irrationality measures for Γ(1/4) and Γ(1/3)

Abstract

Let μ denote the irrationality exponent. Bruiltet proved in 2002 that μ(Γ(1/4))≤ 10143 and μ(Γ(1/3))≤ 10151. We prove μ(Γ(1/4))≤ 3.24· 1026 and μ(Γ(1/3))≤ 1.74· 1026, with explicit thresholds h(p/q)≥ 5.4· 107 and h(p/q)≥ 4.7· 107 respectively, against 1075 and 1079 in the published statements. The proof keeps the architecture of Bruiltet's argument -- Philippon's transcendence criterion together with a zero estimate in commutative algebraic groups -- and replaces three of its ingredients. First, an approximate Schwarz principle based on Hermite interpolation replaces the gravitation estimate of Reyssat; on a lattice point set its cost per node is governed by a lattice energy and drops from about 3.7 to about 1.0. Second, a summation lemma for the failure of Diaz's approximation lemma sharpens the passage from an approximation measure to an irrationality measure. Third, the auxiliary point is taken at a torsion point of order 4, respectively 3, which lowers the degree of the base field from 8d to 2d. All numerical constants are produced by a verifier run in interval arithmetic, supplied as ancillary files.

Related

  1. A new proof of the irrationality of e
    Achraf Ben Said
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Irrationality of the first stabilization of a complex smooth cubic threefold
    Ting Gong, Shitan Xu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Degree of irrationality of abelian surfaces
    Songsong Huang, Zhi Jiang, Xin Yang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. A Diophantine generalization of Fourier's irrationality trick
    Archan Chattopadhyay, Chandan Chattopadhyay
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Degree of irrationality of a product of two elliptic curves
    Yongnam Lee
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{giraudin2026irrationality,
  title = {{Irrationality measures for $Γ(1/4)$ and $Γ(1/3)$}},
  author = {David Niedbala Giraudin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.01711},
  eprint = {2611.01711},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01711},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Irrationality measures for Γ(1/4) and Γ(1/3)
AU  - David Niedbala Giraudin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.01711
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01711
AB  - Let μ denote the irrationality exponent. Bruiltet proved in 2002 that μ(Γ(1/4))≤ 10^143 and μ(Γ(1/3))≤ 10^151. We prove μ(Γ(1/4))≤ 3.24· 10^26 and μ(Γ(1/3))≤ 1.74· 10^26, with explicit thresholds h(p/q)≥ 5.4· 10^7 and h(p/q)≥ 4.7· 10^7 respectively, against 10^75 and 10^79 in the published statements. The proof keeps the architecture of Bruiltet's argument -- Philippon's transcendence criterion together with a zero estimate in commutative algebraic groups -- and replaces three of its ingredients. First, an approximate Schwarz principle based on Hermite interpolation replaces the gravitation estimate of Reyssat; on a lattice point set its cost per node is governed by a lattice energy and drops from about 3.7 to about 1.0. Second, a summation lemma for the failure of Diaz's approximation lemma sharpens the passage from an approximation measure to an irrationality measure. Third, the auxiliary point is taken at a torsion point of order 4, respectively 3, which lowers the degree of the base field from 8d to 2d. All numerical constants are produced by a verifier run in interval arithmetic, supplied as ancillary files.
ER  -