Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Exploring Knowledge and Consumption of Beans Among Adults with Gluten-Related Disorders—A Cross Sectional Study in Canada

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
  2. 2Department of Human Health Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
  3. 3Department of Nutritional Crop Physiology, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
  4. 4Department of Applied Nutritional Psychology, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 12, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
  5. 5Department of Food Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada

Abstract

Introduction: Gluten-related disorders have been increasingly reported across all gender and age groups. In addition to their higher cost, gluten-free products are often higher in fat, sugar, and sodium. Despite the substantial nutritional benefits of beans, they remain insufficiently represented in gluten-free dietary patterns. Aim: In this study, our aim was to explore knowledge and consumption of beans among adults with gluten-related disorders, including celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). Methods: This study followed a cross-sectional, observational design. In collaboration with Celiac Canada, individuals with a diagnosis of CD or NCGS were recruited. Participants were asked to complete a Qualtrics-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported Diagnosis and Health Status, Eating Habits and Consumption of Beans, Knowledge, Determinants of Bean Consumption, Barriers and Drivers of Bean Consumption, and Demographics. Descriptive statistics as well as exploratory analyses and regression analyses were conducted, with statistical significance defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: A total of 528 participants, including 490 individuals with CD and 38 with NCGS, completed the survey. Several self-reported micronutrient deficiencies were mentioned at the time of diagnosis, with iron-deficiency anemia being the most prevalent (69.0%). In addition, the most frequently self-reported symptom was fatigue (72.2%), followed by flatulence and abdominal pain (71.2%). Most participants (96.4%) strongly agreed that following a gluten-free diet is essential for the management of their diagnosis. Although a high proportion of participants (88.6%) reported daily consumption of plant-based foods, only 0.9% of participants reported daily consumption of dry beans and 0.4% reported daily consumption of canned beans. The most frequently mentioned motivators were the nutritional value of beans (74.9%), whereas the most common barrier to bean consumption was the long cooking and soaking time (40.2%). In addition, potential cross-contamination with gluten was mentioned as another major concern to including beans in gluten-free diets. Despite participants’ confidence in knowledge about beans and their nutritional value and health benefits, most participants (68.9%) agreed that knowing more about how to prepare beans would encourage them to consume them as part of their diets. Based on multivariable linear regression analysis, confidence in knowledge about bean preparation (p ≤ 0.001) and interest in learning more about them (p ≤ 0.001) were positively associated with increased bean consumption. Conclusions: Despite high interest in beans and strong confidence in bean-related knowledge among individuals with CD or NCGS, consumption remains relatively low. Educational resources focused on preparation, recipes, and gastrointestinal tolerance may help increase consumption. Future research should evaluate the tolerability and long-term health effects of bean consumption in CD and NCGS populations.

Related

  1. Exploring overweight and obesity among Pakistani university students: a nationwide prevalence and knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) assessment – a cross-sectional study
    Omar Irfan, Salman Muhammad Soomar, Mohammad Aadil Qamar +5
    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Consumption and knowledge of protein supplements in the Spanish adult population: A cross-sectional survey-based study.
    Elena Bethencourt-Barbuzano, Soraya Paz-Montelongo, Ángel José Gutiérrez +3
    Farmaceuticos comunitariosPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Assessing theoretical knowledge related to surgical and clinical skills in Syrian medical students : A cross-sectional study.
    Jamal Ataya, Abdullah Ismail, Alyamama Kousa +5
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Knowledge, attitudes and care-seeking behaviours related to chronic disease management among migrant workers in Singapore: a cross-sectional study
    Vanessa Zhi Jie Aw, Shi-En Joanna Chan, Halina Talib +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Post-Exercise Milk Consumption Behavior and Health- and Performance-Related Perceptions Among Collegiate Baseball Players: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study
    Tsukasa Yamamoto, Manato Seguchi, Yoko Iio +6
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
BibTeX
@article{stahl2026exploring,
  title = {{Exploring Knowledge and Consumption of Beans Among Adults with Gluten-Related Disorders—A Cross Sectional Study in Canada}},
  author = {Alicia Stahl and Alyssa Chapleau and Sana Tasawar and Safa Shahid and Niels J. Maywald and Nanette Stroebele-Benschop and Iris Joye and Dalia El Khoury},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18213553},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3553},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Exploring Knowledge and Consumption of Beans Among Adults with Gluten-Related Disorders—A Cross Sectional Study in Canada
AU  - Alicia Stahl
AU  - Alyssa Chapleau
AU  - Sana Tasawar
AU  - Safa Shahid
AU  - Niels J. Maywald
AU  - Nanette Stroebele-Benschop
AU  - Iris Joye
AU  - Dalia El Khoury
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18213553
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3553
AB  - Introduction: Gluten-related disorders have been increasingly reported across all gender and age groups. In addition to their higher cost, gluten-free products are often higher in fat, sugar, and sodium. Despite the substantial nutritional benefits of beans, they remain insufficiently represented in gluten-free dietary patterns. Aim: In this study, our aim was to explore knowledge and consumption of beans among adults with gluten-related disorders, including celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). Methods: This study followed a cross-sectional, observational design. In collaboration with Celiac Canada, individuals with a diagnosis of CD or NCGS were recruited. Participants were asked to complete a Qualtrics-based questionnaire, exploring self-reported Diagnosis and Health Status, Eating Habits and Consumption of Beans, Knowledge, Determinants of Bean Consumption, Barriers and Drivers of Bean Consumption, and Demographics. Descriptive statistics as well as exploratory analyses and regression analyses were conducted, with statistical significance defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: A total of 528 participants, including 490 individuals with CD and 38 with NCGS, completed the survey. Several self-reported micronutrient deficiencies were mentioned at the time of diagnosis, with iron-deficiency anemia being the most prevalent (69.0%). In addition, the most frequently self-reported symptom was fatigue (72.2%), followed by flatulence and abdominal pain (71.2%). Most participants (96.4%) strongly agreed that following a gluten-free diet is essential for the management of their diagnosis. Although a high proportion of participants (88.6%) reported daily consumption of plant-based foods, only 0.9% of participants reported daily consumption of dry beans and 0.4% reported daily consumption of canned beans. The most frequently mentioned motivators were the nutritional value of beans (74.9%), whereas the most common barrier to bean consumption was the long cooking and soaking time (40.2%). In addition, potential cross-contamination with gluten was mentioned as another major concern to including beans in gluten-free diets. Despite participants’ confidence in knowledge about beans and their nutritional value and health benefits, most participants (68.9%) agreed that knowing more about how to prepare beans would encourage them to consume them as part of their diets. Based on multivariable linear regression analysis, confidence in knowledge about bean preparation (p ≤ 0.001) and interest in learning more about them (p ≤ 0.001) were positively associated with increased bean consumption. Conclusions: Despite high interest in beans and strong confidence in bean-related knowledge among individuals with CD or NCGS, consumption remains relatively low. Educational resources focused on preparation, recipes, and gastrointestinal tolerance may help increase consumption. Future research should evaluate the tolerability and long-term health effects of bean consumption in CD and NCGS populations.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -