Detector-Facing Empirical Protocols for Semantic Commitment Quantum Gravity

Abstract

SCQG Paper 12 of 28

This paper sets out experiments for testing Semantic Commitment Quantum Gravity. It connects the theory’s physical equations to detector records, matched control interventions and decision rules fixed before data collection.

The main laboratory proposal uses light coupled to a mechanical oscillator. It compares three conditions. Arm D adds measured noise independently of the record. Arm C measures the system and uses the result for feedback control. Arm S keeps that physical control matched and changes a stored instruction that selects a later action. The contrast C − D tests active record stabilization. The contrast S − C tests whether instruction content changes later choices on new task cases excluded from training and tuning.

The paper gives equations for the cavity and oscillator, continuous measurement, feedback, noise, covariance reconstruction, work and heat. The calculations include the physical bath response, detector bandwidth, control latency and approximation error. Calibration and statistical procedures connect predicted changes in physical variability to quantities estimated from repeated runs.

A source–receiver protocol distinguishes when a record becomes physically available from when the receiver can reliably identify its source. A separate clock protocol tests whether retained physical records can distinguish different cycles of a repeating clock. Gravity protocols combine causal order, discrete curvature, screen response, energy flux and tensor reconstruction to test the Einstein equation at specified scales.

Each protocol specifies the controls, calibration, uncertainty, held-out evaluation, stopping rules and retained data needed to reproduce the analysis. These conditions determine when a result supports the tested prediction, reveals a physical discrepancy or remains inconclusive.

This is Paper 12 of the Semantic Commitment / Quantum Gravity series.

All you need is the universal correlation detector: A unified approach to universalize communication protocols over quantum channels
Kaito Watanabe, Takaya Matsuura, Ryuji Takagi
arXiv24 Sep 2026PreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
Where Agent Protocols Stop: Cross-Layer Gaps in Authority, Commitment, Evidence, and Service Closure
Zhongjie Wang, Mingyi Liu, Shuang Yu +1
Zenodo18 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
Credal Large Language Models for Semantic Commitment under Uncertainty
Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Sofiia Nikolenko, Fabio Cuzzolin
arXiv1 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
Semantic Coherence Index V1.0: An Empirical Framework for Longitudinal Language-Model Interaction Measurement
Tara Callegari
Zenodo25 Oct 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
Detectability-Aware Screening of Post-Merger Gravitational-Wave Damping Anomalies in Real Detector Noise: A Graph-Spectral Approach with Empirical Null Calibration
Ruslan Alaskarov
arXiv1 Sep 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textInstrumentation & methods Gravitation & general relativityarXiv

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@misc{betzer2026detectorfacing,
  title = {{Detector-Facing Empirical Protocols for Semantic Commitment Quantum Gravity}},
  author = {David Betzer},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23519757},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23519757},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Detector-Facing Empirical Protocols for Semantic Commitment Quantum Gravity
AU  - David Betzer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23519757
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23519757
AB  - SCQG Paper 12 of 28  This paper sets out experiments for testing Semantic Commitment Quantum Gravity. It connects the theory’s physical equations to detector records, matched control interventions and decision rules fixed before data collection.  The main laboratory proposal uses light coupled to a mechanical oscillator. It compares three conditions. Arm D adds measured noise independently of the record. Arm C measures the system and uses the result for feedback control. Arm S keeps that physical control matched and changes a stored instruction that selects a later action. The contrast C − D tests active record stabilization. The contrast S − C tests whether instruction content changes later choices on new task cases excluded from training and tuning.  The paper gives equations for the cavity and oscillator, continuous measurement, feedback, noise, covariance reconstruction, work and heat. The calculations include the physical bath response, detector bandwidth, control latency and approximation error. Calibration and statistical procedures connect predicted changes in physical variability to quantities estimated from repeated runs.  A source–receiver protocol distinguishes when a record becomes physically available from when the receiver can reliably identify its source. A separate clock protocol tests whether retained physical records can distinguish different cycles of a repeating clock. Gravity protocols combine causal order, discrete curvature, screen response, energy flux and tensor reconstruction to test the Einstein equation at specified scales.  Each protocol specifies the controls, calibration, uncertainty, held-out evaluation, stopping rules and retained data needed to reproduce the analysis. These conditions determine when a result supports the tested prediction, reveals a physical discrepancy or remains inconclusive.  This is Paper 12 of the Semantic Commitment / Quantum Gravity series.
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite