Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Background proteome correction promotes confident identification of dynamic protein-protein interactions between different biological contexts

  1. 1La Jolla Institute for Immunology

Abstract

Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) enables the characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and the ease and sensitivity of such experiments has progressively increased. Beyond steady-state interactions of target proteins, a strong interest has emerged in monitoring how PPIs change upon significant biological perturbations, such as in disease contexts or small molecule modulation of the target protein. These perturbations likely not only induce PPI changes but can also lead to altered expression of proteins not of direct interest. Changes in protein abundance may alter which proteins adsorb to the affinity purification matrix, and due to the sensitivity of modern mass spectrometers, these differential ''background binders'' can masquerade as differential interactors. Contemporary approaches often do not account for differences in the background proteome, potentially inflating the number of false positives and negatives reported. Here, we provide technical considerations for the reliable annotation of dynamic PPIs, using the O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) as a case study. We describe the installation of affinity epitope tags on endogenous OGT in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), which we then apply for OGT interactor identification via AP-MS. We show that accurate representation of the bead background, which depends on the affinity matrix in use, is critical for elimination of false positive and false negative PPIs. This became even more pertinent as OGT PPI dynamics were measured under OGT catalytic inhibition via OSMI-4, which is known to perturb gene expression. The proteomes of OSMI-4-treated and control-treated mESCs differed, leading to distinct bead backgrounds in which the differential background proteins appeared as interaction gains or losses. These false positives were resolved by incorporating straightforward experimental controls through a practical statistical framework, allowing for a direct and confident comparison between treatment conditions. Incorporating these considerations into workflows investigating PPI dynamics will improve data fidelity and reproducibility.

Related

  1. Singlet oxygen-generating upconversion nanoplatforms: from photophysical design and dosimetry to biological interactions and nanosafety
    Amanda Annunciação Farhat, Hermi Felinto Brito, Marisa Helena Gennari de Medeiros +1
    Bioscience NanotechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersDOAJ
  2. Nanotoxicology and Nanoparticle Safety in Biomedical Designs [Correction]
    International Journal of NanomedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersPMC
  3. Addition and Correction to “Numerical Investigation of LPG Leakage Dispersion and Explosion Consequences in a Spherical Tank with Safety Walls”
    Dina Zhang, Xu Zhai, Erxiao Wang +5
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossref
  4. Occurrence, Sources, and Export Rates of Ti-Bearing and Ce-Bearing (Nano)particles in the Seine River Where Engineered Nanoparticles Reach Natural Background Levels
    Francine Wang, Mickael Tharaud, Marc Benedetti
    Environmental Science and TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAnalytical chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Ion–polymer affinities of PEDOT:PSS from open-circuit titrations in a multi-cation background
    Leandro Julian Mele, Gerwin Dijk, Alberto Salleo
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{brunelli2026background,
  title = {{Background proteome correction promotes confident identification of dynamic protein-protein interactions between different biological contexts}},
  author = {M. A. Brunelli and L. Morishita-Cartwright and N. M. Clark and D. R. Mani and S. A. Myers},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.01.748607},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.748607v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Background proteome correction promotes confident identification of dynamic protein-protein interactions between different biological contexts
AU  - M. A. Brunelli
AU  - L. Morishita-Cartwright
AU  - N. M. Clark
AU  - D. R. Mani
AU  - S. A. Myers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.01.748607
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.01.748607v1
AB  - Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) enables the characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs), and the ease and sensitivity of such experiments has progressively increased. Beyond steady-state interactions of target proteins, a strong interest has emerged in monitoring how PPIs change upon significant biological perturbations, such as in disease contexts or small molecule modulation of the target protein. These perturbations likely not only induce PPI changes but can also lead to altered expression of proteins not of direct interest. Changes in protein abundance may alter which proteins adsorb to the affinity purification matrix, and due to the sensitivity of modern mass spectrometers, these differential ''background binders'' can masquerade as differential interactors. Contemporary approaches often do not account for differences in the background proteome, potentially inflating the number of false positives and negatives reported. Here, we provide technical considerations for the reliable annotation of dynamic PPIs, using the O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) as a case study. We describe the installation of affinity epitope tags on endogenous OGT in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), which we then apply for OGT interactor identification via AP-MS. We show that accurate representation of the bead background, which depends on the affinity matrix in use, is critical for elimination of false positive and false negative PPIs. This became even more pertinent as OGT PPI dynamics were measured under OGT catalytic inhibition via OSMI-4, which is known to perturb gene expression. The proteomes of OSMI-4-treated and control-treated mESCs differed, leading to distinct bead backgrounds in which the differential background proteins appeared as interaction gains or losses. These false positives were resolved by incorporating straightforward experimental controls through a practical statistical framework, allowing for a direct and confident comparison between treatment conditions. Incorporating these considerations into workflows investigating PPI dynamics will improve data fidelity and reproducibility.
ER  -