Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Versus Conventional Magnetic Resonance In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging for Liver Fat Fraction Quantification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
- 1Department of Radiology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore.
- 2Parkway Radiology, Singapore 228510, Singapore.
- 3Department of Radiology, Eastern General Hospital, Singapore 168582, Singapore.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Multiple imaging modalities are available for non-invasive hepatic fat quantification. We performed a hypothesis-generating methods-comparison study to compare liver fat fraction (FF) measurements obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-phase/opposed-phase (IP/OP) with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multi-material decomposition (MMD) techniques. Methods: This retrospective method-comparison study included 45 patients who underwent abdominal DECT and MRI. Corresponding 2-cm² regions of interest were placed in hepatic segments VI and VII. DECT and MRI fat fraction measurements were compared using Spearman's correlation and Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analyses. Exploratory receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) analyses evaluated the ability of DECT fat fraction measurements to discriminate MRI-defined steatosis thresholds. Results: DECT FF was positively associated with MRI FF in segment VI (Spearman's ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001) and segment VII (ρ = 0.57, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that DECT measurements were lower than MRI measurements on average, with mean biases (MRI-DECT) of 3.39% and 2.57% for segments VI and VII respectively, accompanied by wide limits of agreement. Passing-Bablok analysis showed no statistically significant proportional or constant bias. The ability of DECT FF to classify MRI-defined steatosis improved with increasing disease severity, with AUCs of 0.77 for mild steatosis and 0.88-0.99 for moderate-to-severe steatosis. Conclusions: This preliminary method-comparison study demonstrates an association between DECT and MRI fat fraction measurements and supports the feasibility of DECT for opportunistic hepatic fat quantification. Although exploratory AUC analyses provide preliminary estimates for future validation studies, substantial inter-modality variability currently limits definitive clinical application.
Related
- Quantification of plaque and detection of high-risk plaque characteristics based on coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison between superresolution deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction
- Cuboid stress fracture as an uncommon cause of lateral foot pain: Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and photon-counting computed tomography - A case report
- Spontaneous retrobulbar hematoma on serial computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a case report
- Comparative evaluation of fractal analysis and canny edge-detection algorithms for the quantification and classification of bone trabecular patterns in cone-beam computed tomography
- The utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and surgical planning of thyroid eye disease and dysthyroid optic neuropathy
BibTeX
@article{loo2026dualenergy,
title = {{Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Versus Conventional Magnetic Resonance In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging for Liver Fat Fraction Quantification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.}},
author = {Jing Hong Loo and Shi Min Yeow and Kang Ren Yong and Harvard Zhi Rui Lee and Sze Ying Yee and Srinivas Anandswaroop Uppaluri and Syed Aftab and Sandeep Halagatti Venkatesh and Freda Jawan and Shawn Shi Xian Kok and Praveen M Yogendra and Min On Tan},
journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193260},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882415},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Versus Conventional Magnetic Resonance In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging for Liver Fat Fraction Quantification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
AU - Jing Hong Loo
AU - Shi Min Yeow
AU - Kang Ren Yong
AU - Harvard Zhi Rui Lee
AU - Sze Ying Yee
AU - Srinivas Anandswaroop Uppaluri
AU - Syed Aftab
AU - Sandeep Halagatti Venkatesh
AU - Freda Jawan
AU - Shawn Shi Xian Kok
AU - Praveen M Yogendra
AU - Min On Tan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
JO - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics16193260
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882415
AB - Background/Objectives: Multiple imaging modalities are available for non-invasive hepatic fat quantification. We performed a hypothesis-generating methods-comparison study to compare liver fat fraction (FF) measurements obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-phase/opposed-phase (IP/OP) with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multi-material decomposition (MMD) techniques. Methods: This retrospective method-comparison study included 45 patients who underwent abdominal DECT and MRI. Corresponding 2-cm² regions of interest were placed in hepatic segments VI and VII. DECT and MRI fat fraction measurements were compared using Spearman's correlation and Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analyses. Exploratory receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) analyses evaluated the ability of DECT fat fraction measurements to discriminate MRI-defined steatosis thresholds. Results: DECT FF was positively associated with MRI FF in segment VI (Spearman's ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001) and segment VII (ρ = 0.57, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that DECT measurements were lower than MRI measurements on average, with mean biases (MRI-DECT) of 3.39% and 2.57% for segments VI and VII respectively, accompanied by wide limits of agreement. Passing-Bablok analysis showed no statistically significant proportional or constant bias. The ability of DECT FF to classify MRI-defined steatosis improved with increasing disease severity, with AUCs of 0.77 for mild steatosis and 0.88-0.99 for moderate-to-severe steatosis. Conclusions: This preliminary method-comparison study demonstrates an association between DECT and MRI fat fraction measurements and supports the feasibility of DECT for opportunistic hepatic fat quantification. Although exploratory AUC analyses provide preliminary estimates for future validation studies, substantial inter-modality variability currently limits definitive clinical application.
SN - 2075-4418
ER -