Preoperative ovarian vascular parameters and perioperative factors associated with ovarian reserve marker decline after laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy: a retrospective prediction study
- 1Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Wenzhou People’s Hospital/Wenzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
- 2School of Nursing, Guangxi Health Science College, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- 3Health Management Centre, Yueyang People’s Hospital, Yueyang, Hunan, China
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cystectomy is a commonly used surgical treatment for ovarian endometrioma, but postoperative reduction in ovarian reserve markers is a recognized concern. Preoperative identification of women at increased risk may support counseling and surgical planning. This study evaluated whether multidimensional ovarian vascular and hemodynamic ultrasound parameters are associated with subsequent decline in ovarian reserve markers.
Objective: To evaluate the association of preoperative multidimensional ultrasound parameters with postoperative ovarian reserve marker decline and to develop an exploratory perioperative prediction model.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 280 reproductive-age women undergoing laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma cystectomy (May 2021-May 2024) was analyzed. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound on menstrual cycle days 2–5 yielded 2D morphological parameters [ovarian volume [OV], antral follicle count [AFC]], 3D vascular parameters [vascularization index [VI], flow index [FI], vascularization-flow index [VFI]], and spectral Doppler parameters (resistance index [RI], pulsatility index [PI], peak systolic velocity [PSV], end-diastolic velocity [EDV]). Serum AMH, FSH, LH, and E2 were measured. Ovarian reserve markers were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary 6-month outcome was a study-specific composite decline in ovarian reserve markers. Exploratory multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a perioperative model, and internal optimism was estimated by 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Apparent discrimination was assessed by ROC analysis.
Results: At 6 months, 118 of 280 patients (42.1%) met the study-specific composite outcome. Women meeting the outcome had lower preoperative VI, VFI, FI, PSV, and EDV and higher RI and PI (all P < 0.01). Pearson correlations showed moderate associations of vascular parameters with 6-month AMH and FSH levels. AMH decreased after surgery in both groups, with a greater reduction in patients meeting the composite outcome; significant effects of time, group, and group-by-time interaction were observed (all P < 0.001). The exploratory perioperative logistic model retained age, bilateral cysts, preoperative maximum cyst diameter, intraoperative r-AFS score, preoperative VI, and preoperative RI. Higher VI was associated with lower odds of the composite outcome, whereas higher RI was associated with greater odds. The composite model had an apparent AUC of 0.888 (95% CI 0.845–0.923), which was higher than that of VI (AUC=0.702) or RI (AUC=0.699) alone. Bootstrap internal validation yielded a corrected AUC of 0.878. At a probability cutoff of >0.57, sensitivity and specificity were 76.3% and 90.1%, respectively, with a PPV of 84.9% and an NPV of 83.9%. Because r-AFS is intraoperative and no external validation was performed, this is a perioperative rather than a strictly preoperative model and requires external validation before clinical application.
Conclusions: Preoperative ovarian vascular and hemodynamic ultrasound parameters, particularly VI and RI, were associated with postoperative decline in ovarian reserve markers. The composite model showed good apparent discrimination and modest optimism on internal bootstrap validation; however, external validation and comparison with models incorporating established baseline ovarian reserve markers are required before clinical implementation.
Related
- Spontaneous Pregnancy After Laparoscopic Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Stripping and Ethanol Sclerotherapy.
- Comparative perioperative and follow-up outcomes of three laparoscopic reconstructive procedures for pediatric duplex kidney : A retrospective cohort study
- Temporary Uterine Artery Clamping During Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Perioperative Hemoglobin Decline: A Retrospective Single-Center Comparative Study
- Histopathological findings in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy specimens and their relation to preoperative endoscopy : A retrospective cross-sectional study of 954 patients
- Impact of vasopressin-assisted laparoscopic endometrioma excision on ovarian reserve: a randomized controlled trial
BibTeX
@article{wu2026preoperative,
title = {{Preoperative ovarian vascular parameters and perioperative factors associated with ovarian reserve marker decline after laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy: a retrospective prediction study}},
author = {Mengmeng Wu and Mei Qin and Linrui Zhang},
journal = {Frontiers in Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fsurg.2026.1964292},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1964292},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Preoperative ovarian vascular parameters and perioperative factors associated with ovarian reserve marker decline after laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy: a retrospective prediction study
AU - Mengmeng Wu
AU - Mei Qin
AU - Linrui Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Frontiers in Surgery
DO - 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1964292
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1964292
AB - Background: Laparoscopic cystectomy is a commonly used surgical treatment for ovarian endometrioma, but postoperative reduction in ovarian reserve markers is a recognized concern. Preoperative identification of women at increased risk may support counseling and surgical planning. This study evaluated whether multidimensional ovarian vascular and hemodynamic ultrasound parameters are associated with subsequent decline in ovarian reserve markers. Objective: To evaluate the association of preoperative multidimensional ultrasound parameters with postoperative ovarian reserve marker decline and to develop an exploratory perioperative prediction model. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 280 reproductive-age women undergoing laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma cystectomy (May 2021-May 2024) was analyzed. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound on menstrual cycle days 2–5 yielded 2D morphological parameters [ovarian volume [OV], antral follicle count [AFC]], 3D vascular parameters [vascularization index [VI], flow index [FI], vascularization-flow index [VFI]], and spectral Doppler parameters (resistance index [RI], pulsatility index [PI], peak systolic velocity [PSV], end-diastolic velocity [EDV]). Serum AMH, FSH, LH, and E2 were measured. Ovarian reserve markers were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary 6-month outcome was a study-specific composite decline in ovarian reserve markers. Exploratory multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a perioperative model, and internal optimism was estimated by 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Apparent discrimination was assessed by ROC analysis. Results: At 6 months, 118 of 280 patients (42.1%) met the study-specific composite outcome. Women meeting the outcome had lower preoperative VI, VFI, FI, PSV, and EDV and higher RI and PI (all P < 0.01). Pearson correlations showed moderate associations of vascular parameters with 6-month AMH and FSH levels. AMH decreased after surgery in both groups, with a greater reduction in patients meeting the composite outcome; significant effects of time, group, and group-by-time interaction were observed (all P < 0.001). The exploratory perioperative logistic model retained age, bilateral cysts, preoperative maximum cyst diameter, intraoperative r-AFS score, preoperative VI, and preoperative RI. Higher VI was associated with lower odds of the composite outcome, whereas higher RI was associated with greater odds. The composite model had an apparent AUC of 0.888 (95% CI 0.845–0.923), which was higher than that of VI (AUC=0.702) or RI (AUC=0.699) alone. Bootstrap internal validation yielded a corrected AUC of 0.878. At a probability cutoff of >0.57, sensitivity and specificity were 76.3% and 90.1%, respectively, with a PPV of 84.9% and an NPV of 83.9%. Because r-AFS is intraoperative and no external validation was performed, this is a perioperative rather than a strictly preoperative model and requires external validation before clinical application. Conclusions: Preoperative ovarian vascular and hemodynamic ultrasound parameters, particularly VI and RI, were associated with postoperative decline in ovarian reserve markers. The composite model showed good apparent discrimination and modest optimism on internal bootstrap validation; however, external validation and comparison with models incorporating established baseline ovarian reserve markers are required before clinical implementation.
SN - 2296-875X
ER -